Section Twenty-eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Section Twenty-eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Section Twenty-eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a part of the Constitution of Canada's Charter of Rights. It does not contain a right so much as it provides a guide as to how to "interpret" rights in the Charter. Specifically, section 28 addresses concerns of sexual equality, and is analogous to (and was modelled after) the proposed Equal Rights Amendment in the United States.

The section reads:

Interpretation

Section 28 is not so much a right because it does not state that men and women are equal; this is done by section 15. Instead, section 28 ensures that men and women have equal claim to rights listed in the Charter. Section 28 "can" be more beneficial to women in that the section 33 notwithstanding clause can be used to nullify women's section 15 rights, but not to impair the operation of section 28. Constitutional scholar Peter Hogg has even speculated that section 28 cannot be limited by a section 1 test, given that section 28 is supposed to operate "notwithstanding" other Charter provisions. [Hogg, Peter W. "Constitutional Law of Canada". 2003 Student Ed. (Scarborough, Ontario: Thomson Canada Limited, 2003), pp. 1116-1117.] Nevertheless, in the judicial decision "Blainey v. Ontario Hockey Association et al." (1986), it was found that section 28 should have limits of some sort, or it would threaten "public decency" and affirmative action meant to "aid" women. [http://canlii.ca/ca/com/chart/s-28.html]

In the case "Native Women's Association of Canada v. Canada" (1994), the Court considered and rejected the argument that section 28 could reinforce section 2 of the Charter (freedom of expression) so that a women's interest group could receive equal benefits as other Aboriginal interest groups in constitutional negotiations, as the other groups had received government money to discuss their concerns. While the Court acknowledged that discussing issues in constitutional negotiations is a matter of expression, there was no evidence that Aboriginal women received lesser rights, as the favoured groups supposedly represented both Aboriginal men and women.

Alternative interpretations

The standard conservative reading of section 28 came as a disappointment to feminists. As the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women noted, many of the feminists who pushed for having section 28 in the Charter hoped that it would not just be read literally but would also "provide a social and historical context in which women's claims can be better understood"; it existed to remind judges charged with enforcing the Charter that women had been "recognized as 'persons'" and had gained more equality in marriage. This would, in turn, hopefully strengthen women's rights in section 15, which feminists felt was needed after having been disappointed by pre-Charter women's rights case law. In fact, in the British Columbia Court of Appeal case "R. v. Red Hot Video" (1985), some judges did refer to section 28 to say that laws against allegedly sexist obscenity could be upheld; section 28 could have a role to play in a section 1 test upholding laws against obscenity. This line of thinking, however, has had little influence since. [Brodsky, Gwen and Shelagh Day. "Canadian Charter Equality Rights for Women: One Step Forward or Two Steps Back?" (Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women, September 1989).]

Aboriginal rights

It has been argued that section 28 can ensure that Aboriginal and treaty rights be guaranteed equally to Aboriginal men and women. On the one hand, section 28 might be seen as ensuring only rights guaranteed by the Charter are held equally by men and women. In this case section 28 is inapplicable to Aboriginal rights, since Aboriginal rights are protected by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 rather than the Charter (which constitutes sections 1-34 of the Constitution Act, 1982). However, while the Charter does not guarantee Aboriginal rights, section 25 does mention Aboriginal rights. The wording of section 28 mentions "the rights and freedoms referred to" by the Charter, not "rights and freedoms guaranteed" by the Charter. Since Aboriginal rights are referred to by section 25, section 28 may be applicable. While section 25 states that Aboriginal rights should not be limited by the Charter, this may be trumped by section 28's opening words, "Notwithstanding anything in this Charter..." [Kent McNeil, "Aboriginal Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms," (Canada, Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, 1996), p. 76.]

In 1983, section 35 was amended to add a clause similar to section 28. It states that "Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the aboriginal and treaty rights referred to in subsection (1) are guaranteed equally to male and female persons." Thus, for consistency it makes sense that section 28 applies to section 25, since a sex equality interpretation explicitly applies to section 35. [McNeil, 77.]

History

Earlier efforts by feminist organizations and the Advisory Council on the Status of Women to include more sex equality in the Charter were met with lack of cooperation from Ottawa, leading to "Chatelaine" magazine editor Doris Anderson resigning from her position in the negotiations. [ [http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/02/14/women-charter-060214.html Women mark anniversary of rights milestone ] ] In February and March 1981, 1,300 women came to Ottawa to stage demonstrations in favour of more sexual equality guarantees in the Charter. [Lugtig, Sarah and Debra Parkes, "Where do we go from here?" "Herizons", Spring 2002, Vol. 15 Issue 4, page 14.] The content of section 28 thus first appeared in the April 1981 draft of the Charter, [Hogg, p. 1117.] but in November it had to be diluted to placate Saskatchewan premier Allan Blakeney. Section 33 could now limit section 28, as Blakeney argued the section would otherwise endanger the traditional supremacy of elected bodies. If "Straight from the Heart", the memoir of Jean Chrétien, Attorney General of Canada during the Charter negotiations, is to be believed, Chrétien felt the dilution was not very problematic because he expected women's protests would convince Saskatchewan to drop the issue. [ Chrétien, Jean. "Straight from the Heart". (Key Porter Books Limited, 1994), pp. 188-189.] This is indeed what happened; one of the most vocal leaders of the protest against Blakeney's move was Anderson. [Rawlinson, H. Graham and JL Granatstein. "The Canadian 100: The 100 Most Influential Canadians of the 20th Century." (Toronto: McArthur & Company, 1997), p. 75.]

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Indigenous peoples of the Americas — Red Indian redirects here. For the native inhabitants of the island of Newfoundland known for using red ochre, see Beothuk. Indigenous peoples of the Americas …   Wikipedia

  • Canadian federalism — For the political ideology that favours Quebec remaining within the Canadian federation rather than pursuing independence, see Quebec federalist ideology. Canada This article is part of the series: Politics and government of Canada …   Wikipedia

  • Law, Crime, and Law Enforcement — ▪ 2006 Introduction Trials of former heads of state, U.S. Supreme Court rulings on eminent domain and the death penalty, and high profile cases against former executives of large corporations were leading legal and criminal issues in 2005.… …   Universalium

  • Official bilingualism in Canada — Culture of Canada This article is part of a series History Canadians Canadian identity …   Wikipedia

  • First Nations — This article is about the indigenous peoples of Canada. For other indigenous peoples, see Indigenous peoples by geographic regions. First Nations …   Wikipedia

  • Religious freedom in Canada — is a constitutionally protected right, allowing believers the freedom to assemble and worship without limitation or interference. Legal frameworkConstitutional rightsThe Fundamental Freedoms section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms… …   Wikipedia

  • Ethnic origins of people in Canada — Culture of Canada This article is part of a series History Canadians Canadian identity …   Wikipedia

  • R. v. Wong — ! bgcolor= 6699FF | Case opinions R. v. Wong , [1990] 3 S.C.R. 36, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the evidence obtained by electronic video surveillance conducted without authorization. The Court held that individuals… …   Wikipedia

  • education — /ej oo kay sheuhn/, n. 1. the act or process of imparting or acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment, and generally of preparing oneself or others intellectually for mature life. 2. the act or process of… …   Universalium

  • Security certificate — This article is about the Canadian legal mechanism. For Internet security certificates, see Public key certificate. In Canadian law, a security certificate is a mechanism by which the Government of Canada can detain and deport foreign nationals… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”