Cairns Tilt Train derailment

infobox AU rail accident

---

title = Cairns Tilt Train derailment
date = 15 November 2004
time = 11:55 pm
location = Berajondo, Queensland
location-dist = 342
location-dir = NNW
location-city = Brisbane
line = North Coast railway line
operator = QR Traveltrain
type = Derailment
cause = Excessive speed
trains = 1
pax = 157
deaths = 0
injuries = 157, 2 serious

The Cairns Tilt Train derailment occurred at 11:55 pm on 15 November 2004 when the "City of Townsville" diesel Tilt Train derailed north of Berajondo, approximately km to mi|num=342|abbr=yes northwest of Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland, Australia.

The prima facie cause of the incident was excessive speed; the train was travelling at convert|112|km/h|mph|abbr=on when it derailed at the beginning of a curve with a speed limit of convert|60|km/h|mph|abbr=on. Despite the seriousness of the incident, there were no fatalities.

Background

The train

Following from the successful introduction of the two electric tilting trains between Brisbane and Rockhampton in 1998, the twin "City of Cairns" and "City of Townsville" diesel-powered tilt trains were introduced to service on 15 June 2003 between Brisbane and Cairns. [cite press release
title = New Tilt Train will knock your socks off | publisher = Queensland Government
date = 9 May 2003 | url = http://statements.cabinet.qld.gov.au/MMS/StatementDisplaySingle.aspx?id=19577
accessdate = 2008-03-28] As only a third of the North Coast railway line from Brisbane to Cairns is electrified, the two diesel trains were required for services to reach farther major coastal destinations such as Townsville and Cairns.

Originally to be called "The Tropical Explorer" [cite press release | title = Queensland Rail. (World Report).
publisher = International Railway Journal | date = 10 January 2002 | url = http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-99511940.html | accessdate = 2008-03-28 ] [cite press release | title = Track Tests begin on QR’s Tilting Tropical Explorer | publisher = Rail, Tram & Bus Industry Union | date = 3 September 2001
url = http://www.rtbu.asn.au/72.html | accessdate = 2008-03-28 ] with a colourful, tropical livery reflecting "the sun, blue sky, beach and palms", [cite press release | title = Rail come-back at full tilt | publisher = Queensland Government | date = 14 February 2001
url = http://statements.cabinet.qld.gov.au/MMS/StatementDisplaySingle.aspx?id=32794 | accessdate = 2008-03-28 ] the name was soon quietly dropped and instead called the "Cairns Tilt Train" similar to its earlier electric version, with a simple, plain yellow and maroon striped livery along its stainless steel body.

The two trains operate at speeds of up to convert|160|km/h|mph|abbr=on and consist of two convert|1350|kW|hp|abbr=on push-pull diesel engines at either end, six sitting cars, and one Club Car complemented with a trolley service delivering meals to seats. Passengers enjoy 2x1 Business Class seating throughout the train with an individual entertainment system of multiple movie and audio channels.

The two trains are fitted with a data logger that records information about the vehicle and track, maintenance data, and the speed and operation of the train. This information was retrieved from the unit and used by investigators in determining the cause of the incident.

Train protection systems

QR, using the experience of its many years of railway operations, developed a series of protection methods to reduce the risk of accidents to its tilting trains. The "City of Townsville" was under the protection of:
* two driver operation – a co-driver acting as an observer to avoid the chance of errors being made by a single driver, and ensure the driver is operating the train safely; they observe the route ahead independently and call signals, which the driver acknowledges, and can intervene if the driver does not respond appropriately
* on-board vigilance system – a device that tests the alertness of the driver with stimuli, and operates the brakes of the train if there is no response
* Station Protection System – a system of sensors on the track to warn drivers with an alarm when they are approaching a station area that requires greater attention
* speed boards – posted signage beside the track that shows drivers the speed they are required to have their train at or below before passing
* training – to ensure drivers are competent, which includes knowledge of the route the train operates along so drivers can recognise their geographic position and manage speed accordingly.

While QR had Automatic Train Protection implemented on the line, a more proactive form of protection that would apply the train's brakes if the driver failed to respond to warnings, it was not implemented in its tilt trains as it believed the protection methods it was using would be sufficient.

The service

When introduced, the Cairns Tilt Train cut the travel time between Brisbane and Cairns by seven hours compared to existing services, and the timetable was formulated in such a way that it offered a daylight service between Mackay and Cairns so as to not directly compete with its electric equivalent to Rockhampton. Services were three times a week, departing Roma Street railway station, Brisbane on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 6:25 pm, arriving Cairns railway station Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays at 7:20 pm; returning from Cairns on Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 8:15 am, arriving Brisbane at 9:10 am on Mondays, Thursdays and Saturdays. [cite paper | title = Tilt Train schedules and fares | author = QR Traveltrain | date = 1 April 2004
url = http://web.archive.org/web/20040823010445/http://www.traveltrain.com.au/Images/tilt_train_schfares_tcm9-3440.pdf
format = PDF | accessdate = 2008-03-28 ]

Incident

The "City of Townsville" diesel Tilt Train departed Roma Street railway station in the Brisbane central business district on-time at 6:25 pmcite paper | author = Government of Australia | title = Rail Safety Investigation QT1472, Derailment of Cairns Tilt Train VCQ5, North of Berajondo, Queensland, 15 November 2004 (part 1) | publisher = Australian Transport Safety Bureau | date = 16 October 2005 | url = http://www.transport.qld.gov.au/resources/file/eb601004640aa03/Pdf_rail_safety_berajondo_lowres_part01.pdf | format = PDF | accessdate = 2008-04-01 ] on a normal scheduled service to Cairns, numbered VCQ5. The full journey is split into parts, with a first change of crew at Bundaberg; the drivers of their first part of the journey found no defects with the train and reported the trip as uneventful.

Departing Bundaberg two minutes early at 11:11 pm with two drivers, five passenger service attendants and 150 passengers, the "City of Townsville" reached Berajondo at 11:50 pm. Four minutes later, after passing through a series of curved sections of track with speed-restrictions between convert|60|km/h|mph|abbr=on and convert|80|km/h|mph|abbr=on, the co-driver left his seat and driver's cabin and went to a vestibule area adjacent to make a "brew" for the driver, as he had complained about the quality of the beverage that was offered at Bundaberg.cite paper | author = Government of Australia | title = Rail Safety Investigation QT1472, Derailment of Cairns Tilt Train VCQ5, North of Berajondo, Queensland, 15 November 2004 (part 2) | publisher = Australian Transport Safety Bureau | date = 16 October 2005 | url = http://www.transport.qld.gov.au/resources/file/eb6014046419662/Pdf_rail_safety_berajondo_lowres_part02.pdf | format = PDF | accessdate = 2008-04-01 ]

The driver maintained control of the train and was operating it normally, keeping it under or close to posted speed limits. Travelling at convert|111|km/h|mph|abbr=on with a limit of convert|150|km/h|mph|abbr=on, at 11:55:11 pm the driver of train passed over a mid-section train protected magnet to warn of the reduced speed limit ahead. The driver immediately acknowledged the alarm, and kept the train at speed with the train's throttle at 60 per cent power. At 11:55:24 pm, close to the posted convert|60|km/h|mph|abbr=on speed limit, the driver moved the train's throttle to zero power, then to emergency braking less than one second after.

At 11:55:27 pm, km to mi|num=419.493|abbr=yes from Brisbane (Roma Street), the "City of Townsville" derailed while travelling at convert|112|km/h|mph|abbr=on. The lead power car 5403 came to rest m to ft|num=108|abbr=yes past the point of derailment parallel to the track after skidding onto its right side. Baggage car 'A' came to rest upright behind it, first sitting car 'B' was approximately 40 degrees off to the line of travel, sitting cars 'C' and 'D' jack-knifed at right angles to the track. Car 'E', a club car, came to rest parallel to the track but some m to ft|num=15|abbr=yes away from it due to the force of the derailing cars before and after it. Sitting car 'F' was about 90 degrees right angle to the track, while the last sitting car 'G' was on the left side of the track. The trailing power car 5404 remained upright with just its lead bogie set partially derailed to the left. All cars became detached except for cars 'A' and 'B'.

As the "City of Townsville" derailed underneath electrified overhead lines, the Electrical Control Operator at Rockhampton contacted the North Coast Control at 11:57 pm to report that a circuit breaker had tripped the 25 kV AC traction power supply approximately 419 km north of Brisbane. North Coast Control identified this site as where the train was travelling through, and tried to contact the driver a number of times by radio but did not receive a response; the train is powered by two diesel engines and would not necessarily have been affected by an interruption to the overhead power supply. At the same time, a passenger from the derailed train called emergency services on his own mobile phone and raised the alarm of the incident. News of this incident was reported back to North Coast Control and at 12:02 am, and along with the report by the Electrical Control Operator of the overhead traction power supply being tripped, it was recognised that a major incident had occurred.

Investigation

Three investigations were launched after the incident: internally within QR; by Queensland Transport as rail safety in Queensland is regulated by the state government department, along with the Department of Industrial Relations' Division of Workplace Health and Safety and Electrical Safety Office; and the Australian Transport Safety Bureau to look at causes for the incident and to make recommendations to prevent it happening again.

Initial train event recorder release

On 17 November 2004, just over a day after the derailment, QR's Chief Executive Officer, Bob Scheuber, along with the Queensland Police Commissioner, Robert Atkinson, released the data held in the train event recorder that found the train was travelling at convert|112|km/h|mph|abbr=on when it derailed, at a point with a signposted limit of convert|60|km/h|mph|abbr=on. Scheuber said that is was not known if the train's speed was the only cause of the derailment, but that "it would be one of the contributing factors". [cite news | author = Australian Associated Press | title = Tilt Train going too fast: black box | publisher = "The Age" | date = 2004-11-17 | url = http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/11/17/1100574530027.html | accessdate = 2008-09-30 ] The release of this information angered the Australian Federated Union of Locomotive Employees, which covers train crews including drivers, who threatened a 24-hour strike on Friday, pending a telephone hook-up with members on Thursday night. The industrial action did not proceed. [cite news | title = Tilt Train services back on track | publisher = Australian Broadcasting Corporation | date = 2004-11-20 | url = http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200411/s1247821.htm | accessdate = 2008-09-30 ]

Australian Transport Safety Bureau investigation findings

Firstly, the prima facie cause of the derailment was that the train was travelling at an excessive speed – convert|112|km/h|mph|abbr=on at the beginning of a curve with a posted speed limit of convert|60|km/h|mph|abbr=on. The lead power car rolled, dragging most of the the remaining cars off the track. The driver did not reduce the speed of the train before it entered the curve where it derailed. The investigation believed that there was no evidence that the driver deliberately ignored speed limits or drove in excess of limits, nor that he intended the train to derail. Up to the time of the derailment, the train was in steady power, and the train's brakes were not activated until just before it derailed. The report found that the driver may have been disorientated or distracted up to the curve, and did not recognise the geographic proximity as to where the train was at the time.

At km to mi|num=417.733|abbr=yes from Brisbane, km to mi|num=1.76|abbr=yes|precision=2 and 61 seconds before the derailment, the posted speed limit for the Tilt Train was convert|150|km/h|mph|abbr=on, an increase from convert|110|km/h|mph|abbr=on. The report found that it may have been possible that the driver mistook the mid-section alarm to be the station protection magnet alarm located before Baffle. After the curve where the train derailed is a similar layout of track, where after an increase of the speed limit to convert|150|km/h|mph|abbr=on is a left curve with a speed limit of convert|110|km/h|mph|abbr=on before Baffle.

The report also found that the driver may have left the driving position for a moment to get food from his bag or the train's mini fridge, under the belief that it was safe to do so. After reorientating himself returning to his seat, it would have been too late to apply the emergency brakes with the train travelling too fast.

The second driver being absent from the drivers' cabin removed one of the primary defenses of having two drivers in the cab to avoid errors made by just one. [cite paper | first = George | last = Erdos | title = NEWSLETTER No 7/2006 | publisher = Railway Technical Society of Australasia, SA Chapter | date = July 2006 | url = http://rtsa.com.au/assets/2008/03/rtsa-sa-nl-jul-2006.pdf | format = PDF | accessdate = 2008-05-02 ] The co-driver sits to the right of the driver, and their main task is to observe that the driver is controlling the train safely, to watch the direction the train is travelling and call signals verbally to which the driver acknowledges. The co-driver can intervene in the control of the train should the driver not react appropriately. Before the derailment, there was no requirement for the co-driver to call-out critical speed limit changes, nor prohibit the co-driver from leaving the drivers' cabin to, say, prepare beverages in the adjacent area.

The weather conditions in the area was fine, wind was low, and the temperature was convert|24.5|C|F. The moon had set at 7:23 pm, over four hours earlier, and was 26° below the horizon, meaning that while visibility was good, the area the train was operating was in complete darkness. With the exception of the illumination given by the train's headlights, this darkness exposed a weakness in another of the train's protection methods – drivers having knowledge and competence of the route they operate in – for landmarks can not be seen and drivers' field of view is reduced and their spatial awareness compromised.

Aftermath

Damage to the "City of Townsville" was significant. About m to ft|num=120|abbr=yes of track and sleepers were damaged, and three stanchions supporting the electrified overhead power lines and associated wiring were destroyed had to be replaced. The costs of the incident, including subsequent investigation, was estimated to be $A35.5 million.

Repairs to the track were completed on 20 November 2004, five days after the derailment. All Tilt Trains were limited to a maximum operational speed of convert|100|km/h|mph|abbr=on throughout the state, [cite news | author = Australian Associated Press | title = Trains running back over accident site | publisher = "The Age" | date = 2004-11-20 | url = http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/11/20/1100838269389.html | accessdate = 2008-09-30 ] and resumed higher running speeds on 15 June 2007 after owner and operator QR had implemented a series of safety recommendations from the investigations including fitting the fleet with Automatic Train Protection that would automatically slow or stop the train if the driver has not responded to or ignored warnings of a stop signal ahead or a curve speed restriction. [cite news | last = Maugeri | first = Melissa | title = Train back to full tilt | publisher = "The Courier Mail" | date = 2007-05-22 | url = http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,21770470-3102,00.html | accessdate = 2008-09-30 ]

The "City of Townsville" was fully repaired by its manufacturer, Downer EDI Rail in Maryborough, and returned to service.

References