Gender roles in Christianity

Part of a series on Christianity and Gender

Theology

Female disciples of Jesus Gender roles in Christianity Jesus' interactions with women List of women in the Bible Paul of Tarsus and women Women as theological figures Women in the Bible

4 major positions

Christian Egalitarianism Christian feminism Complementarianism Biblical patriarchy

Church and society

Christianity and homosexuality Ordination of women Women in Church history

Organizations

Christians for Biblical Equality Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood Evangelical and Ecumenical Women's Caucus

Theologians and authors

Feminist: Letha Dawson Scanzoni · Anne Eggebroten · Virginia Ramey Mollenkott Egalitarian: William J. Webb · Kenneth E. Hagin · Gordon Fee · Frank Stagg · Paul Jewett · Stanley Grenz · Roger Nicole Complementarian: Don Carson · John Frame · Wayne Grudem · Douglas Moo · Paige Patterson · Vern Poythress Patriarchal: Doug Phillips · R. C. Sproul, Jr. · Douglas Wilson

This box: view · talk · edit

Part of a series on
Women in Society
Society Business · Education · Workforce · Politics · Military · Legal rights · History · Nobel Prize
Science and technology Medicine · Science · Engineering · Computing
Arts and humanities Literature · Philosophy · Fine arts · Film and cinema · Photography
Religion Bahá'í Faith · Buddhism · Christianity · Hinduism · Islam · Judaism · Sikhism
Popular culture Sports · Comics · Speculative fiction · Journalism and media · Video games
Feminism portal
v · Christianity traditionally has given men the position of authority in marriage, society and government. This position places women in submissive roles, and usually excludes women from church leadership, especially from formal positions requiring any form of ordination. The Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches, and many conservative Protestant denominations assert today that only men can be ordained—as clergy and as deacons. Many progressive Christians disagree with the traditional male-authority and female-submission paradigm. They take a Christian egalitarian or Christian feminist view, holding that the overarching message of Christianity provides positional equality for women in marriage and in ministry. Accordingly, some Protestant churches now ordain women to positions of ecclesiastical leadership. Despite these emerging theological differences, the majority of Christians regard women with dignity and respect[citation needed]as having been created alongside men in the Image of God. The Bible is seen by many[citation needed] as elevating and honoring women, especially as compared with certain other religions or societies.[1] Women have filled prominent roles in the Church historically, and continue to do so today in spite of significant limitations imposed by ordination restrictions. Women in the New Testament Church Beyond generally accepted social standards which are continually shifting, Christianity sets a moral standard, regarding attitudes toward and treatment of women, as was personally exemplified by Jesus.[2] Jesus and women Main article: Jesus' interactions with women Jesus always showed the greatest esteem and the greatest respect for woman, for every woman, and in particular He was sensitive to female suffering. Going beyond the social and religious barriers of the time, Jesus reestablished woman in her full dignity as a human person before God and before men ... Christ’s way of acting, the Gospel of his words and deeds, is a consistent protest against whatever offends the dignity of women. — John Paul II, "Thoughts on Women─Address to Italian Maids," April 1979 From the beginning of the early Christian church, starting with Jesus, women were important members of the movement. The examples of the manner of Jesus reveal his attitudes toward women and show repeatedly how he liberated and affirmed women. Both complementarians and egalitarians see Jesus as treating women with compassion, grace and dignity.[2] The gospels of the New Testament, especially Luke, often mention Jesus speaking to or helping women publicly and openly, contrary to the social norms of the time.[3] He reached out to the marginalized in his society and thus, his appeal was great.[2] Martha's sister Mary sat at Jesus' feet being taught, a privilege reserved for men in Judaism. Jesus had female followers who were his sponsors,[Lu 8:1-3] and he stopped to express concern for the women of Jerusalem on his way to be crucified,[Lu 23:26-31] while Mary Magdalene is recorded to be the first person to have the privilege of seeing Jesus after resurrection, having been charged by Jesus to tell others of what she had seen even though the testimony of a woman was at that time not considered valid.[Mk 16:9] As time went on and the disciples continued to spread Jesus' message by word of mouth, groups of Christians organized within the homes of believers. Those who could offer their home for meetings were considered important within the movement and assumed leadership roles.[4] Paul of Tarsus Main article: Paul of Tarsus and women The letters of Paul—dated to the middle of the 1st century CE—and his casual greetings to acquaintances offer information about Jewish and Gentile women who were prominent in the movement. His letters provide clues about the kind of activities in which women engaged more generally.[5] He comends with great affection to the Roman comunity Phoebe, a servant of the church at Cenchreae, for she had been the patron of many, including himself.[Rom. 16:1] He greets Priscilla (Prisca), Junia, Julia, and Nereus' sister.[Rom. 16:3,7,15] Paul writes that Priscilla and her husband risked their lives to save his life.[Rom 16:3-5] He praises Junia (or Junias) as "prominent among the apostles" (NRSV) or "well known to the apostles" (ESV), who had been imprisoned for their labor. Some theologians understand the name to be that of a woman, suggesting that Paul recognised female apostles in the Church.[Rom 16:7][6][7] Mary and Persis are commended for their hard work.[Rom. 16:6,12] Euodia and Syntyche are called his fellow-workers in the gospel.[Phil. 4:2-3] Some theologians believe that these biblical reports provide evidence of women leaders active in the earliest work of spreading the Christian message,[8][9] while others reject that understanding.[10] The evidence also indicates that these women "ministered" in supporting roles of the church much as the women who followed Christ supported his ministry. Women in church history Main article: Women in Church history Apostolic Age From the very beginning of the early Christian church, women were important members of the movement, although some complain that much of the information in the New Testament on the work of women has been overlooked.[11] Some also argue that many assumed that it had been a "man's church" because sources of information stemming from the New Testament church were written and interpreted by men. Recently, scholars have begun looking in mosaics, frescoes, and inscriptions of that period for information about women's roles in the early church.[11] Patristic age From the early patristic age, the offices of teacher and sacramental minister were reserved for men throughout most of the church in the East and West.[12] Tertullian, the 2nd century Latin father, wrote that "It is not permitted to a woman to speak in church. Neither may she teach, baptize, offer, nor claim for herself any function proper to a man, least of all the sacerdotal office" ("On the Veiling of Virgins"). Origen (AD 185-254) stated that, Even if it is granted to a woman to show the sign of prophecy, she is nevertheless not permitted to speak in an assembly. When Miriam the prophetess spoke, she was leading a choir of women ... For [as Paul declares] "I do not permit a woman to teach," and even less "to tell a man what to do."[13] Christian historian Philip Schaff records early church fathers of the 3rd and 4th centuries as teaching regarding 1 Cor. 14:34-35: From the early patristic age, the offices of teacher and sacramental minister were reserved for men throughout most of the church in the East and West.[12] Tertullian, second century Latin prelate, wrote that "It is not permitted to a woman to speak in church. Neither may she teach, baptize, offer, nor claim for herself any function proper to a man, least of all the sacerdotal office.""On the Veiling of Virgins" In early centuries, the Eastern church allowed women to participate to a limited extent in ecclesiastical office by ordaining deaconesses.[12] Middle ages In the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Church, the priesthood and the ministries dependent upon it such as Bishop, Patriarch and Pope, were restricted to men.[12] The first Council of Orange (441) forbade the ordination of women to the diaconate.[12] With the establishment of Christian monasticism, other influential roles became available to women. From the 5th century onward, Christian convents provided opportunities for some women to escape the path of marriage and child-rearing, acquire literacy and learning, and play a more active religious role. In the later Middle Ages women such as Saint Catherine of Siena and Saint Teresa of Avila, played significant roles in the development of theological ideas and discussion within the church, and were later declared Doctors of the Roman Catholic Church. Post Reformation The Protestant Reformation ended female convents, which had existed within Roman Catholicism, and which the Reformers saw as bondage.[14] By shutting down female convents within the movement, Protestantism effectively closed off the option of a full-time religious role for Protestant women, as well as one which had provided some women a life in academic study.[15] Among the many nuns who abandoned the monastic life was the wife of Martin Luther, Katherine von Bora. The majority of Protestant churches upheld the traditional position,[16] and restricted ruling and preaching roles within the Church to men until the 20th century, although there were early exceptions among some groups such as the Quakers and within some Pentecostal holiness movements.[17] John Knox (1510–1572) also denied women the right to rule in the civic sphere, as he asserted in his famous First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regimen of Women. Baptist theologian Dr. John Gill (1690–1771) comments on 1 Corinthians 14:34,35, stating In Gen_3:16, "thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee". By this the apostle would signify, that the reason why women are not to speak in the church, or to preach and teach publicly, or be concerned in the ministerial function, is, because this is an act of power, and authority; of rule and government, and so contrary to that subjection which God in his law requires of women unto men. The extraordinary instances of Deborah, Huldah, and Anna, must not be drawn into a rule or example in such cases.[18] Methodist founder John Wesley (1703–1791) and Methodist theologian Adam Clarke (1762–1832) both upheld male headship, but allowed that spiritual Christian women could publicly speak in church meetings if they "are under an extraordinary impulse of the Spirit" (Wesley),[19] and that such were to obey that influence, and that "the apostle lays down directions in chap. 11 for regulating her personal appearance when thus employed.” (Clarke)[20] Puritan theologian Matthew Poole (1624–1679) concurred with Wesley, adding, But setting aside that extraordinary case of a special afflatus, [strong Divine influence] it was, doubtless, unlawful for a woman to speak in the church.[21] Matthew Henry (1662–1714) in his commentary, entertains allowing “praying, and uttering hymns inspired” by women, as such “were not teaching”.[22] Modern views Some 19th-century Christian authors[23] began codifying challenges to traditional views toward women both in the church and in society. Only since the 1970s have more diverse views become formalized. There are four main viewpoints in the modern debate. They are known respectively as Christian feminism, Christian Egalitarianism, Complementarianism, and Biblical patriarchy. Christian feminism Main article: Christian Feminism Christian Feminists take an actively feminist position from a Christian perspective.[24] Recent generations have experienced the rise of what has been labeled by some as "Christian feminism" —a movement that has had a profound impact on all of life, challenging some traditional basic Christian interpretations of Scripture with respect to roles for women.[25] However, Christian feminism represents the views of the more theologically liberal end of the spectrum within Christianity. In contrast to the more socially conservative Christian egalitarians, Christian feminists tend to support homosexual rights and a pro-choice stance on abortion.[26][27] The Evangelical and Ecumenical Women’s Caucus, a major international Christian feminist organization, values "inclusive images and language for God."[28] Egalitarian view Main article: Christian Egalitarianism Christian Egalitarians' interpretation of Scripture brings them to the conclusion that the manner and teachings of Jesus, affirmed by the Apostle Paul, abolished gender-specific roles in both the church and in marriage. Official Statement Men, Women and Biblical Equality[29] was prepared in 1989 by several evangelical leaders to become the official statement of Christians for Biblical Equality (CBE). The statement lays out their biblical rationale for equality as well as its application in the community of believers and in the family. They advocate ability-based, rather than gender-based, ministry of Christians of all ages, ethnicities and socio-economic classes.[30] Egalitarians support the ordination of women and equal roles in marriage, and are more conservative both theologically and morally than Christian feminists. Some key Christian Egalitarian beliefs Both women and men were created equal by God[Gen. 1:27] Neither man nor woman was cursed by God at The Fall of Man[Gen. 3:16] but were warned by God in a prophetic sense what would be the natural consequences of sin having entered the human race.[31] Jesus' radical "new Covenant" view was correctly articulated by Paul of Tarsus when he wrote that "...there is no male nor female, for you are all one in Christ."[Gal. 3:28] A scripture passage they consider key to the advocacy of full equality of responsibility and authority for both women and men is contained in a Pauline polemic containing three antitheses: There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. — Galatians 3:28 Christian Egalitarians interpret this passage as expressing that the overarching teaching of the New Testament is that all are "one in Christ." The three distinctions, important for Jewish life, are declared by Paul to be invalid in Christ. Therefore, among those "in Christ" there must be no discrimination based on race or national origin, social level, or gender. They respect the natural biological uniqueness of each gender, not seeing it as requiring any dominant/submissive applications of gender to either marriage or church leadership. David Scholer, prominent New Testament scholar at Fuller Theological Seminary, affirms this view. He believes that Galatians 3:28 is “the fundamental Pauline theological basis for the inclusion of women and men as equal and mutual partners in all of the ministries of the church.”[32] Galatians 3:28 represents "the summation of Paul's theological vision," according to Pamela Eisenbaum, professor at Iliff School of Theology, who is one of four Jewish New Testament scholars teaching in Christian theological schools.[33][34] Christian Egalitarianism holds that the submission of the woman in marriage and womanly restrictions in Christian ministry are inconsistent with the true picture of biblical equality. The equal-yet-different doctrine taught by Complementarians is considered by them to be a contradiction in terms.[35] Conservative theologian Roger Nicole, a Baptist considered an expert in Calvinism and regarded as one of the preeminent theologians in America, is a Christian Egalitarian and also a Biblical Inerrantist. He recognizes that biblical egalitarianism is still viewed by many as inconsistent with biblical inerrancy, although he disagrees. He writes that "the matter of the place of women in the home, in society, and in the church is not an issue that can be conclusively determined by a few apparently restrictive passages that are often advanced by those who think that subordination represents God’s will for women."[36] I believe that most, if not all, of the restrictions on women in society have no basis in Scripture, and that those maintained in the Church are based on an inadequate interpretation of a few restrictive passages, which put them in contradiction with the manifest special concern and love of God for women articulated from Genesis to Revelation. — Roger Nicole, 2006 A limited notion of gender complementarity is held and is known as "complementarity without hierarchy."[37] Complementarian view Main article: Complementarianism Complementarians believe that God made men and women to be equal in personhood and value but different in roles. They understand the Bible as teaching that God created men and women to serve different roles in the church and the home.[38] In the 1991 book Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, leading Complementarian theologians outlined what they consider to be biblically sanctioned definitions of masculinity and femininity: "At the heart of mature masculinity is a sense of benevolent responsibility to lead, provide for and protect women in ways appropriate to a man's differing relationships. "At the heart of mature femininity is a freeing disposition to affirm, receive and nurture strength and leadership from worthy men in ways appropriate to a woman's differing relationships."[25] Official Statement The Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood[39] was prepared by several evangelical leaders at a Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW) meeting in Danvers, Massachusetts, in December 1987. The statement lays out their biblical rationale for male priority and female submission in the community of believers and in the family. Additionally it cites a set of concerns shared by complementarians over other contemporary philosophies about gender: Cultural uncertainty and confusion over complementary differences between masculinity and femininity Unraveling marriages Increasing attention given what they termed to be feminist egalitarianism Ambivalence about motherhood and homemaking Claims of legitimacy for illicit sexual relationships and pornography Upsurge of physical and emotional abuse in the family Emergence of roles for men and women in church leadership seen as nonconforming to Biblical teaching Nontraditional reinterpretation of apparently plain meanings of Biblical texts A growing threat to Biblical authority. They attribute these ills to the "apparent accommodation of some within the church to the spirit of the age at the expense of winsome, radical Biblical authenticity which…may reform rather than reflect our ailing culture."[39] Interpretation of Scripture Complementarians tend to be biblical inerrantists who take a more literal view of biblical interpretation. They disagree with Christian Egalitarians on theological positions related to gender,[40] such as in holding that: Man was created with "headship" over the woman by being created first.[Gen. 2:22] [1Cor 11:2-9] Female exclusion from leadership over men is also justified due to her deception by the devil, which resulted in The Fall, for which Adam is also, or primarily, culpable.[Gen. 3:16] [1Timothy 2:12-14] [Romans 5:12-15] Both Old and New Testaments set a pattern of male leadership; for instance the priestly and kingly offices of the Old Testament were restricted to males; the Apostles of Jesus were all male; and Paul's instructions regarding church eldership in the epistles 1 Timothy and Titus appear to restrict this position to men. Primary texts in the New Testament which are understood to support male headship include 1 Corinthians 11:3, 1 Timothy 2:12 and Ephesians 5:22ff: But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. (KJV) But I permit not a woman to teach, nor to have dominion over a man, but to be in quietness. (ASV) Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. (TNIV) In Galatians 3:28, complementarians believe that the Apostle Paul is establishing that all believers, no matter what their racial, social, or gender status, share the same spiritual status in their union with Christ. However, they do not believe that or any other scriptures put an end to positional and functional distinctions based on gender, which they see as being clearly stated and upheld in the New Testament, as a matter of Christian principle. Complementarians' understanding is that both Old and New Testaments do prescribe a male-priority based hierarchy and gender roles in the church and in marriage, where women have equal dignity with men but subordinate roles. Biblical patriarchy view Main article: Biblical patriarchy Biblical patriarchy as expressed by the Vision Forum is similar to Complementarianism in that it affirms the equality of men and women, but goes further in its expression of the different gender roles. It asserts that "a husband and father is the head of his household, a family leader, provider, and protector" and that the "God-ordained and proper sphere of dominion for a wife is the household and that which is connected with the home".[41] Biblical patriarchy maintains that women do not have authority over men in the church and in the home, but also deny that women should rule in the civic sphere.[42] Thus, William Einwechter calls the Complementarian view referred to above, "two point complementarianism", and regards the biblical patriarchy view as "three-point" or "full" complementarianism.[43][44][45] Terminology Although much of the contemporary literature settles on the terms Complementarianism and Christian Egalitarianism, a number of other more pejorative terms are frequently encountered. In complementarian literature, the term "Christian feminism" is sometimes incorrectly used synonymously with "egalitarianism." For examples, see books by Wayne Grudem on the topic. Christian egalitarians generally object to being labeled "feminist" or "evangelical feminist." Their belief in biblical equality is said to be grounded in the biblical teaching that all believers have been given authority in Christ. Conversely, feminist ideology is derived from cultural factors and philosophies. Christian egalitarian author Rebecca Groothuis writes, "Like most cultural systems of thought, feminist ideology is partly true and partly false—almost entirely false at this point in history."[46] In egalitarian literature, the terms "gender traditionalist," "patriarchalist" and "hierarchicalist" are sometimes used with reference to complementarians. The use of these terms in egalitarian literature is defended in Rebecca Merrill Groothuis and Ronald W. Pierce, Discovering Biblical Equality: Complementarity without Hierarchy, IVP 2004, p. 17 . "…it is probably most fitting to refer to those who believe in restricting leadership to men as simply advocates of male leadership, or patriarchalists… traditionalists… or hierarchicalists." William J. Webb describes himself as a "complementary egalitarian." He defines this as "full interdependence and 'mutual submission' within marriage, and the only differences in roles are 'based upon biological differences between men and women'." He uses "Complementarianism" to describe what he calls "a milder form of the historical hierarchical view."[47] Complementarian scholar Wayne A. Grudem objects to Webb's use of "complementary" and "egalitarian" together to describe a thoroughly egalitarian position. Calling the terminology "offensive and confusing," he reasons that doing so simply confuses the issues by using the term "complementary" for a position totally antithetical to what complementarians hold. Grudem finds Webb's use of the term "patriarchy" to be especially pejorative because of its connotations in modern society. He also rejects the term "hierarchicalist" because he says it overemphasizes structured authority while giving no suggestion of equality or the beauty of mutual interdependence.[48] Theological issues Biblical authority In general, all evangelicals involved in the gender debate claim to adhere to the authority of the Bible. Egalitarians typically argue that the dispute has arisen because of differences in interpretation of specific passages.[49] Nevertheless, Wayne Grudem and other complementarians have accused egalitarians of adopting positions which deny the authority, sufficiency and inerrancy of scripture.[10][50] …I believe that ultimately the effective authority of Scripture to govern our lives is at stake in this controversy. The issue is not whether we say we believe the Bible is the Word of God or that we believe it is without error, but the issue is whether we actually obey it when its teachings are unpopular and conflict with the dominant viewpoints in our culture. If we do not obey it, then the effective authority of God to govern His people and His church through His Word has been eroded. — Wayne Grudem (emphases original), Evangelical Feminism and Biblical Truth[10] Biblical hermeneutics Main article: Biblical hermeneutics The egalitarian and complementarian positions differ significantly in their approach to hermeneutics, and specifically in their interpretation of biblical history. Christian egalitarians believe that male and female were created equally[Gen. 1-2] without any hierarchy of roles.[51] God created both woman and man in His own image and likeness. God made the first couple equal partners in leadership over the earth. Both were jointly commissioned to “be fruitful and multiply...to fill the earth...subdue the earth...and rule over it.”[Gen. 1:28] At the Fall, God prophesied to Eve that one result of sin entering the human race would be that her husband would "rule over" her.[Gen. 3:16][52][53] Conservative Christian theologian Gilbert Bilezikian points out that throughout the Old Testament era and beyond, just as God had prophesied, men continued to rule over women in a patriarchal system which he sees as being a "compromise" or "accommodation" between sinful reality and the divine ideal.[52] The coming of Jesus is understood as moving forward from Old Testament patriarchy, re-instituting full equality of gender roles, as succinctly articulated in Galatians 3:28.[52][54] New Testament passages such as Ephesians 5:22-24 which teach submission of wives to husbands are typically understood by egalitarians as a temporary accommodation to a harsh 1st century culture. The Christian egalitarian hermeneutic has received a highly systematic treatment from William J. Webb, professor of New Testament at Heritage Theological Seminary, Ontario, Canada. Webb argues that a major challenge is determining which biblical commands are "transcultural" and therefore applicable today, versus those which are "cultural" and therefore only applicable to the original (1st century) recipients of the text.[47] His "redemptive movement" hermeneutic is justified using the example of slavery, which Webb sees as analogous to the subordination of women. Christians today largely perceive that slavery was "cultural" in biblical times and not something that should be re-introduced or justified, although slavery was (a) found in the Bible and (b) not explicitly banned there.[47] Webb recommends that biblical commands be examined in light of the cultural context in which they were originally written. According to the "redemptive approach", slavery and women's subordination are found in the Bible; however, the same Scriptures also contain ideas and principles which, if developed and taken to their logical conclusion, would bring about the abolition of these institutions.[47] According to that ideal, biblical patriarchy should be replaced by the "all one in Christ Jesus" proclamation of Galatians 3:28 which says "There is no Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus." Some other New Testament instructions that are almost universally considered "cultural" and therefore only applicable to the original (1st century) recipients of the text are for women to wear veils when praying or prophesying,[1 Cor 11:5-6] Christians to wash each other's feet (a direct command from Jesus in the Upper Room discourse,[Jn. 13:14-15] the instruction, appearing five times in the New Testament, to greet one another with a holy kiss[55]—among others. In contrast to egalitarian teaching, complementarians teach that male priority and headship (positional leadership) were instituted prior to the Fall[Gen. 1-2] and that the decree in Genesis 3:16 merely distorted this leadership by introducing "ungodly domination."[25] Complementarians teach that the male leadership seen throughout the Old Testament (i.e., the patriarchs, priesthood and monarchy) was an expression of the creation ideal, as was Jesus' selection of 12 male apostles and New Testament restrictions on church leadership to men only.[1 Tim. 2:11-14][25] Complementarians criticize Webb's hermeneutic. Grudem argues that Webb expects Christians to pursue a "superior ethic" to that found in the New Testament, therefore undermining the authority and sufficiency of Scripture. He claims that Webb and some other evangelicals misconstrue the biblical teaching about both slavery and women, and inappropriately confuse the two. He writes that slavery is tolerated in Scripture but never commanded but in some cases is criticized, whereas wives are explicitly commanded to submit to their husbands and male leadership is never criticized. Additionally, Grudem believes that Webb's "redemptive-movement" hermeneutic (itself a variation of the "trajectory" hermeneutic commonly employed by egalitarians) ultimately relies on subjective judgments that are incapable of producing certainty about ethical views.[10] Gender and the Image of God See also: Imago Dei Complementarians have traditionally held that Christian ministers ought to be men, because of the need to represent Jesus Christ, who was the "Son" of God, and incarnate as a male human being.[56][57] A related position is that while both male and female were made in the image of God, the woman shares in the divine image through the man because she was created out of him, and is his "glory."[1 Cor 11:7-8][58] To us a priest is primarily a representative, a double representative, who represents us to God and God to us... We have no objection to a woman doing the first: the whole difficulty is with the second. But why? ... Suppose the reformer stops saying that a good woman may be like God and begins saying that God is like a good woman. Suppose he says that we might just as well pray to 'Our Mother which art in Heaven' as to 'Our Father'. Suppose he says that the Incarnation might just as well have taken a female as a male form, and the Second Person of the Trinity be as well called the Daughter as the Son. Suppose, finally, that the mystical marriage were reversed, that the Church were the Bridegroom and Christ the Bride. All this, as it seems to me, is involved in the claim that a woman can represent God as a priest does. — C. S. Lewis, Priestesses in the Church? 1948 Christian egalitarians respond by arguing that God is not gendered, and that males and females image God equally and without any differences.[59] In addition, terms such as "Father" and "Son", used in reference to God, should be understood as analogies or metaphors used by the biblical authors to communicate attributes about God in a culture where men had social privilege.[59][60][61] Similarly, Christ became a male not because it was theologically necessary, but because 1st century Jewish culture would not have accepted a female Messiah.[59][60][61] Wayne Grudem takes exception to these egalitarian arguments, insisting that Christ's maleness was theologically necessary; he also alleges that egalitarians are increasingly advocating that God should be thought of as "Mother" as well as "Father", a move which he sees as theologically liberal.[10] The Christian doctrine of the Trinity has become a major focus of the contemporary gender debate, specifically in relation to 1 Cor. 11:3. In 1977, George W. Knight III argued in a book about gender roles that the subordination of women to men is theologically analogous to the subordination of the Son to the Father in the Trinity.[62] Australian theologian Kevin Giles has more recently responded that complementarians have "reinvented" the doctrine of the Trinity to support their views of men and women, suggesting that some complementarians have adopted a heretical view of the Trinity similar to Arianism.[63] A vigorous debate has ensued, with some egalitarians moving towards the idea that there is "mutual dependence" within the Trinity, including "subordination of the Father to the Son", which must be reflected in gender role relations.[60] Wayne Grudem has countered this by asserting that mutual submission in the Trinity cannot be supported by scripture and church history.[10] Relationship between ontology and roles Modern complementarians argue that Genesis 1:26-28 and Galatians 3:28 establish the full equality of males and females in terms of status, worth and dignity.[25] Complementary roles in marriage and church leadership, including the primary authority of men and the submission of wives, are not thought to contradict this principle of ontological equality. The equation of role or functional subordination and ontological inferiority is considered to be a category confusion.[10] Egalitarian author Rebecca Merrill Groothuis has objected to this position. She argues that "woman’s spiritual and ontological equality with man rules out the sort of subordination prescribed by gender traditionalists…. It is not logically possible for woman to be essentially equal to man, yet universally subordinate to man on the basis of an essential attribute (i.e., femaleness)."[64] Current views by denomination In general, the issues have been what the proper role of women is (a) in marriage; (b) in the church; (c) in society at large. Among the denominations, movements, and organizations that express or have previously expressed a view, there are four main views: Full equality African Methodist Episcopal Church American Baptist Churches USA Anglican Church in North America Assemblies of God Baptist Union of Great Britain Christians for Biblical Equality Church of Scotland Church of the Brethren Episcopal Church Evangelical Covenant Church Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland Free Methodist Church Mennonite Church USA Presbyterian Church of Canada Presbyterian Church USA Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) — Quakers have always believed in the legitimacy of women's ministry, with only a few exceptions in the early years. In 1848 at a conference in Seneca Falls, New York, 100 men and women signed a declaration that "all men and women are created equally." Early leaders of the movement were women, including Lucretia Mott. United Church of Canada United Church of Christ United Methodist Church Uniting Church in Australia Protestant Church in the Netherlands Church of Denmark Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland Church of Iceland Church of Norway Church of Sweden Many others Full equality, except clerical offices Anglican Catholic Church Anglican Province of America Eastern Orthodox Church Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod Orthodox Presbyterian Church Presbyterian Church in America Presbyterian Church of Australia Reformed Episcopal Church Seventh-day Adventists Roman Catholic Church. Roman Catholicism, addresses the issue from the highest levels, including the Papal Office. For instance, Pope John Paul II has addressed this issue in his 1995,[65] his 1996,[66] and 1988 Apostolic Letter.[67] Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints United Episcopal Church of North America Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod Many others Restricted roles or rights in both secular and ecclesiastical life: Christian Reconstructionism Dominion theology Mixed Southern Baptist Convention's official position[68] is solely to prohibit females from becoming clergy, and to insist that a wife "graciously submit"[69] to the leadership of her husband, and the husband, in turn, to love the wife, respect her, and refrain from abuse, "loving her as Christ loves the church"[70]. Members of an individual ("local") Southern Baptist church are allowed to vote on matters of business of the church that include the hiring of a pastor. However, many churches that have chosen female clergy as their pastor have been disenfranchised by either local or state Baptist associations. The vast majority of the congregations tend to hold full secular equality for women. Since Baptists enforce autonomy of each church, it can vary widely from church to church. Jehovah's Witnesses appoint only males as elders and deacons ("ministerial servants"), and allow only baptized males to perform weddings, funerals, and baptisms. A baptized female is considered an ordained minister, but she may only lead congregational prayer and teaching in unusual circumstances, and must wear a head covering while doing so. A female Witness minister wears a head covering when teaching in the presence of a baptized male or in the presence of her husband (regardless of whether or not the husband is baptized). Female head covering is not required when teaching outside the Witnesses' congregation setting or when participating in congregation meetings being led by another. Females may vote on congregation matters, and may qualify for appointment as a fulltime pioneer minister.[71] The above lists are examples and are obviously not exhaustive. It is not always clear into which category a church or movement falls. The Wesleyan tradition and the Holiness and Pentecostal movements, as well as a growing number of contemporary Charismatic churches which draw from them, have increasingly accepted women as leaders on an equal footing with men. See also Christian egalitarianism Christian feminism Christians for Biblical Equality an egalitarian organization Christianity Complementarianism Female disciples of Jesus Feminism Feminist theology Jesus' interactions with women Katharine Bushnell Pioneer Christian feminist List of women in the Bible Paul of Tarsus and women Quaker views of women Women as theological figures Women in the Bible References and notes ^ William Dallmann, Why Do I Believe the Bible Is God’s Word?, 1910 ^ a b c Bilezikian, Gilbert. Beyond Sex Roles (2nd ed.) Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker, 1989 ^ Luke 4:38-39, 7:36-50, 8:41-48, 13:10-17 ^ Margaret MacDonald, "Reading Real Women Through Undisputed Letters of Paul" in Women and Christian Origins, ed. by Ross Sheppard Kraemer and Mary Rose D'Angelo (Oxford: University Press, 1999), 204 ^ http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/first/missions.html#letters letters of Paul ^ Wallace, Daniel B. "Junia Among the Apostles: The Double Identification Problem in Romans 16:7" ^ Eldon Jay Epp and Beverly Roberts Gaventa, Junia: The First Woman Apostle, Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2005  ^ King, Karen L. "Women in Ancient Christianity: The New Discoveries." http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/first/women.html ^ "Women's Roles in the Early Church". Christian-thinktank.com. http://www.christian-thinktank.com/fem08.html. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ a b c d e f g Wayne Grudem, Evangelical Feminism and Biblical Truth, Multnomah, 2004, http://www.efbt100.com/  ^ a b MacHaffie, Barbara J. Her story: women in Christian tradition. Fortress Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0-8006-3826-9. ^ a b c d e William Weinrich, "Women in the History of the Church", in John Piper and Wayne Grudem (eds.), Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Crossway 1991  ^ Origen, Fragmenta ex commentariis in epistulam i ad Corinthios ^ Case Study 9: The Impact of the Reformation on Women in Germany Henry J. Cohn, University of Warwick, 2000 ^ Allen, Charlotte. "The Holy Feminine." Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life, 1999. Online: http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=3241 ^ Chrysostom, John. The homilies: Of S. John Chrysostom, archbishop of Constantinople, on the first epistle of St. Paul the apostle to the Corinthians (Library of Fathers of the holy Catholic church). Volume 2. Pub: F. and J. Rivington (1845) Web: 17 Jan 2010. [1] ^ Pierce and Groothuis (eds), Discovering Biblical Equality (2nd ed. 2005), Downer's Grove, IVP, pp. 36–52  ^ "Gill, 1 Corinthians 14:34". Biblestudytools.com. http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/gills-exposition-of-the-bible/1-corinthians-14-34.html. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ [2], John Wesley's notes on the Bible, 1 Cor. 14:34,35 ^ Adam Clarke's commentary on the whole Bible, 1 Cor. 14:34,35 ^ Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1852) ^ "1 Corinthians - Chapter 14 - Matthew Henry Complete Commentary on". Searchgodsword.org. http://www.searchgodsword.org/com/mhc-com/view.cgi?book=1co&chapter=014. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ For example, Katharine Bushnell, L.A. Starr, Charles H. Pridgeon, Phoebe Palmer, A. J. Gordon, Frances Willard, and many others ^ See About the Evangelical and Ecumenical Women's Caucus, http://www.eewc.com/About.htm  ^ a b c d e John Piper and Wayne Grudem (eds.) (1991), Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism, Crossway 1991, ISBN 0891075860  ^ Randall Herbert Balmer, Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism, Baylor University Press 2004, p. 237  ^ Pamela Cochran (2005), Evangelical feminism: a history, NYU Press, ISBN 0814716504, http://books.google.com/?id=KZAA8oBvKjQC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=  ^ "About EEWC". Eewc.com. http://www.eewc.com/About.htm. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ Christians for Biblical Equality. "Men, Women and Biblical Equality." Ltd. CBE on the Web at "Biblical Equality." 1989. Online: http://www.cbeinternational.org/new/about/biblical_equality.shtml ^ http://www.cbeinternational.org Christians for Biblical Equality (CBE) ^ The natural consequences of sin mentioned by God in the Creation account included increased pains in childbearing, and the husband will rule over you ^ Scholer, David M. “Galatians 3:28 and the Ministry of Women in the Church,” Theology, News and Notes. Pasadena: Fuller Theological Seminary, June 1998 ^ Eisenbaum, Pamela. "Is Paul the Father of Misogyny and Antisemitism?" Cross Currents, Association for Religious and Intellectual Life. Winter 2000-2001, 50:4 ^ Iliff School of Theology http://www.iliff.edu/academics/faculty/profiles/peisenbaum/index.php ^ Strauch, Alexander. Men and Women, Equal Yet Different: A Brief Study of the Biblical Passages on Gender. Lewis & Roth Publishers, 1999. ISBN 0-936083-16-6 ^ Nicole, Roger. "Biblical Egalitarianism and the Inerrancy of Scripture." Priscilla Papers, Vol. 20, No. 2. Spring 2006 ^ Ronald W. Pierce and Rebecca Merrill Groothuis (eds.), Discovering Biblical Equality: Complementarity without Hierarchy, IVP 2004, p. 17  ^ Koessler, John. "Wounds of a Friend: Complementarian." Christianity Today June 2008, Vol. 52, No. 6. ^ a b "''The Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood.'' 1987". Cbmw.org. http://www.cbmw.org/Danvers. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ Chapter 1: A Biblical Vision of Manhood and Womanhood as Created by God The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, 2010 ^ "The Tenets of Biblical Patriarchy". Visionforumministries.org. http://www.visionforumministries.org/home/about/biblical_patriarchy.aspx. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ William Einwechter, Men and Women and the Creation Order, Part 1. ^ http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/men_and_women_and_the_creation.aspx ^ http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/ballot_box/the_palin_predicament_resolved.aspx ^ William Einwechter, Men and Women and the Creation Order, Part 3. ^ Groothuis, Rebecca Merrill. "The Basics of Biblical Equality: Belief and Practice." Net:Nov. 1, 2009. <http://www.cbeinternational.org/?q=content/basics-biblical-equality-belief-and-practice> ^ a b c d Webb, William J. Slaves, Women & Homosexuals: Exploring the Hermeneutics of Cultural Analysis. InterVarsity Press, 2001. ISBN 0-8308-1561-9. Webb understands biblical issues of slaves and women to be cultural principles, applicable to that culture, but the biblical principles about homosexuality to be transcultural. ^ Grudem, Wayne A. "Should We Move Beyond the New Testament to a Better Ethic?" Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society (JETS), 47/2 (June 2004) 299–346 ^ http://www.dashhouse.com/resources/Gender/index.htm Gender and Leadership ^ Wayne Grudem, Evangelical feminism: a new path to liberalism?, Crossway, 2006  ^ Walther, Emily, and George H. Walther. "Celebrating Our Partnership." Priscilla Papers, Autumn 1991 Volume 5, Issue 4. ^ a b c Gilbert Bilezikian, Beyond Sex Roles: What the Bible says about a Woman's Place in Church and Family, Baker Academic, 2006 (3rd edition)  ^ Aida Spencer, Beyond the Curse: Women Called to Ministry, Hendrickson, 1989  ^ Doug Heidebrecht. "Distinction and Function in the Church: Reading Galatians 3:28 in Context." Direction. Direction Journal, Mennonite Brethren ^ Romans 16:16a, 1 Cor. 16:20b, 2 Cor. 13:12a, 1 Thess. 5:26, and 1 Pet. 5:14a ^ C. S. Lewis, "Priestesses in the Church?", God in the Dock, Eerdmans, 1970  ^ J. I. Packer (February 1991), "Let's stop making women presbyters", Christianity Today  ^ G. L. Bray, "Image of God", New Dictionary of Biblical Theology, IVP, Leicester, 2000  ^ a b c Rebecca Merrill Groothuis, Good News For Women: A Biblical picture of gender equality, Baker books, 1997  ^ a b c Stanley Grenz, Women in the Church: A Biblical Theology of Women in Ministry, IVP, 1995  ^ a b Paul K. Jewett, The ordination of women, Eerdmans, 1980  ^ George W. Knight III, The New Testament teaching on the role relationship of men and women, Baker Book House, 1977  ^ Kevin Giles, Jesus and the Father: Modern Evangelicals Reinvent the Doctrine of the Trinity, Zondervan, 2006  ^ Rebecca Merrill Groothuis, The Bible and Gender Equality, Christians for Biblical Equality 2005. ^ "Letter to Women". Vatican.va. 1995-06-29. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_29061995_women_en.html. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ "Address on Promoting the Well-Being of Women". Vatican.va. 1996-12-07. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1996/december/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19961207_motherhood_en.html. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ "On the Dignity and Vocation of Women" ^ "The Baptist Faith & Message". Sbc.net. http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp. Retrieved 2010-11-19.  ^ Ephesians 5:21-24 ^ Ephesians 5:25-28 ^ "Head Coverings—When and Why?", Keep Yourselves in God's Love, ©2008 Watch Tower, pages 43-44 and 209-212 General references Bechtel, Lyn M. (1996), "A Symbolic Level of Meaning: John 2.1-11 (The Marriage in Cana)", in Athalya Brenner, A Feminist Companion to The Hebrew Bible in the New Testament (1st ed.), Sheffield, U.K.: Sheffield Academic Press  Fiddes, Paul S. ' "Woman's head is man": a doctrinal reflection upon a Pauline text.' Baptist Quarterly 31.8, 1986. 370-83 Fiddes, Paul S. (1990), "'The status of women in the thought of Karl Barth'", in Janet Martin Soskice, After Eve [alternative title After Eve: women, theology and the Christian tradition] (1st ed.), London: Marshall Pickering  Fontaine, Carole R. (1996), "Disabilities and Illness in the Bible: A Feminist Perspective", in Athalya Brenner, A Feminist Companion to The Hebrew Bible in the New Testament (1st ed.), Sheffield, U.K.: Sheffield Academic Press  Kripal, Jeffrey John. (2007), The Serpent's Gift: Gnostic Reflections on the Study of Religion, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press  Catholic references "Declaration Inter Insigniores on the question of the Admission of Women to the Ministerial Priesthood." Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, October 15, 1976. Apostolic Letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (On Ordination to the Priesthood)." Pope John Paul II, May 22, 1994. "Apostolic Letter Mulieris Dignitatem (On the Dignity of Women)." Pope John Paul II, August 15, 1988. Catechism of the Catholic Church. Many Christians also see Mary as the prototypical Christian, as in the Bible she was the first to hear the Good News of Jesus' coming. She is one of the few of Jesus' followers reported to be present at his crucifixion. Thus she is a woman who is most imitated among Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox saints. The voice of Catholic theologians who believe that neither Scripture nor Tradition excludes the ordination of women can be heard on www.womenpriests.org, an academic website founded by John Wijngaards. References on the history of women in the early Christian Church MacDonald, Margaret. "Reading Real Women through Undisputed Letters of Paul." In Women and Christian Origins edited by Ross Sheppard Kraemer and Mary Rose D'Angelo. Oxford: University Press, 1999. Torjesen, Karen Jo. When Women were Priests: Women's Leadership in the Early Church & The Scandal of their Subordination in the Rise of Christianity. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publisher, 1995. Wiley, Tatha. Paul and the Gentile Women: Reframing Galatians New York: Continuum, 2005. Witherington, Ben III. Women in the Earliest Churches. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988. External links Apostolic Letter Mulieris Dignitatem, Pope John Paul II (1988), on the dignity and vocation of women (statement of Roman Catholic position) Apostolic Letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis of John Paul II (1994) to the Bishops of the Roman Catholic Church on Reserving Priestly Ordination to men alone Christians for Biblical Equality, principal egalitarian organization Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, principal complementarian organization Wikimedia Foundation. 2010. Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную? Christian Verdun Christian Vilches Look at other dictionaries: Christianity and homosexuality — Part of a series on LGBT topics and Christianity Christianity and homosexuality Christianity and transgenderism History of Christianity and homosexuality The Bible and homosexuality Queer theology Blessing of same sex unions Ordination of LGBT… …   Wikipedia Christianity and domestic violence — This article is about Christianity and domestic violence. For other related topics, see Outline of domestic violence. Part of a series on …   Wikipedia Gender and Judaism — is an emerging subfield at the intersection of gender studies and Jewish studies. Gender studies centers on interdisciplinary research on the phenomenon of gender. It focuses on cultural representations of gender and people s lived experience.… …   Wikipedia Christianity in Algeria — Christianity by Country Africa …   Wikipedia Gender role — During World War II, women performed roles some of which would otherwise have been considered male jobs …   Wikipedia Gender — This article is about the distinction between male and female entities and concepts. For other uses, see Gender (disambiguation). Gender is a range of characteristics used to distinguish between males and females, particularly in the cases of men …   Wikipedia Gender of God — The gender of God can be viewed as either a literal or an allegorical aspect of a deity. In polytheistic religions, the gods are more likely to have literal sexual genders (and can often interact with each other in sexual ways). In monotheistic… …   Wikipedia Christianity and colonialism — are often closely associated because Catholicism and Protestantism were the religions of the European colonial powers[1] and acted in many ways as the religious arm of those powers.[2] According to Edward Andrews, Christian missionaries were… …   Wikipedia Gender and religion — There are several notable issues relating to gender and religion. These include both religious comment on secular society and views regarding traditional forms of religious communities themselves. For example, internal religious issues include… …   Wikipedia Women in Christianity — Christian views (attitudes and beliefs) about women vary considerably today as they have throughout the last two millennia, evolving along with or counter to the societies in which Christians have lived. The Bible and Christianity historically… …   Wikipedia 18+ © Academic, 2000-2024 Contact us: Technical Support, Advertising Dictionaries export, created on PHP, Joomla, Drupal, WordPress, MODx. Mark and share Search through all dictionaries Translate… Search Internet Share the article and excerpts Direct link … Do a right-click on the link above and select “Copy Link”