- Pure economic loss in English Law
-
English Tort law Part of the common law series Negligence Duty of care Bolam test Breach of duty Causation Breaking the chain Acts of the claimant Remoteness Professional negligence Psychiatric harm Loss of chance Loss of right Res ipsa loquitur Eggshell skull Trespass Occupiers' liability Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 Defamation Strict liability Vicarious liability Rylands v Fletcher Nuisance Pure economic loss in English law, arising from negligence, has traditionally been limited. Notably, recovery for losses that are "purely economic" arise under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976; and for negligent misstatements, as stated in Hedley Byrne v. Heller. Economic loss generally refers to financial detriment that can be seen on a balance sheet but not physically. Economic loss is then divided into "consequential economic loss" - that which arises directly from some physical damage or injury (e.g. loss of earnings from having your arm cut off) and "pure economic loss", which is everything other.
The fear behind allowing claims for "pure economic loss" is that potentially unlimited claims could flood in. The risks may be unknowable, and parties would find it impossible to insure.[1][2] The U.S. judge Benjamin N. Cardozo famously described it as, "liability in an indeterminate amount, for an indeterminate time, to an indeterminate class".[3]
Examples of pure economic loss include:
- Loss of income suffered by a family whose principal earner dies in an accident. The physical injury is caused to the deceased, not the family.[4]
- Loss of market value of a property owing to the inadequate specifications of foundations by an architect.[5][6][7]
- Loss of production suffered by an enterprise whose electricity supply is interrupted by a contractor excavating a public utility.
The latter case is exemplified by the case of Spartan Steel and Alloys Ltd v. Martin & Co. Ltd.[8] Similar losses are also restricted in German law[9] though not in French law.[10]
Contents
Complex structure theory
Main article: Complex structure theory in English lawThe Complex structure theory is an argument which has been put forward in pure economic loss cases which suggests that a large chattel may be considered to consist of several parts and so damage to other "property" for the purpose of applying Donoghue v Stevenson principles.[11]
Key cases
- Donoghue v Stevenson
- Anns v Merton London Borough Council
- Caparo Industries plc v Dickman
- Murphy v Brentwood District Council
- Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
- Smith v Eric S Bush
- White v Jones
- Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd
- Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd
- Junior Books v Veitchi
- D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners for England
References
- ^ Canadian National Railway Co. v. Norsk Pacific Steamship Co. [1992] 1 SCR 1021 (Canada), per McLachlan J
- ^ Bishop (1982)
- ^ Ultramares v. Touche 174 N.E 441, 444 (N.Y. 1931) (USA)
- ^ Baker v. Bolton (1808) 1 Camp 493 (England and Wales)
- ^ Murphy v. Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 AC 398 (England and Wales)
- ^ Sutherland Shire Council v. Heyman (1985) 60 ALR 1, at 60-61 (Australia)
- ^ Winnipeg Condominium Corporation No.36 v. Bird Construction Co. [1995] 1 SCR 85 (Canada)
- ^ [1973] QB 27
- ^ van Gerven (2001) pp187-188
- ^ van Gerven (2001) pp198-199
- ^ H. G. Beale, W. D. Bishop, Michael Philip Furmston, Contract, p34
Bibliography
- Bishop, W. (1982). "Economic loss in tort". Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2: 1–29. doi:10.1093/ojls/2.1.1.
- Giliker, P. (2005). "Revisiting pure economic loss: lessons to be learnt from the Supreme Court of Canada?". Legal Studies 25: 49–71. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00270.x.
- Lunney, M. & Oliphant, K.. Tort Law: Text and Materials (2nd ed. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. pp 339–423. ISBN 0-19-926055-9.
- Stapleton, J. (1991). "Duty of care and economic loss: a wider agenda". Law Quarterly Review 107: 249.
- — (2002). "Pure economic loss: lessons from case-law-focused 'middle theory'". UCLA Law Review 50: 531.
- van Gerven, W. et al. (eds) (2001). Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Tort Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. ISBN 1841131393.
- Weinrib, E. J. (2005) "The disintegration of duty", in Madden, M. S. Exploring Tort Law, London: Cambridge University Press, pp143-272 ISBN 052185136X
- Lunney, M. & Oliphant, K.. Tort Law: Text and Materials (2nd ed. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. pp 339–423. ISBN 0-19-926055-9.
English law Core subjects 
Further subjects Company law · Competition law · Labour law · Commercial law · Procedure · Family law · Courts of England and WalesRelated systems Law of the United Kingdom · Northern Irish law · Scots law · Welsh law · Law of the British Virgin Islands · Australian law · Canadian law · Hong Kong law · Indian law · Law of New Zealand · Law of the United States · Anglo-Saxon law · Common law · Equity · English case lawCategory · PortalCategories:- Judicial remedies
- Law and economics
- English tort law
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
