Croatia–Serbia genocide case

Croatia–Serbia genocide case
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)

The Peace Palace in The Hague, the seat of the ICJ.
Court International Court of Justice
Citation(s) Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)

The Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)[1] is a case before the International Court of Justice.

The Republic of Croatia filed the suit against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on July 2, 1999, citing Article IX of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.[2] The application was filed for Croatia by the American lawyer David Rivkin.[3] With the transformation of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia into Serbia and Montenegro and the dissolution of that country in 2006, Serbia is considered its legal successor.

The Republic of Serbia filed the genocide lawsuit against the Republic of Croatia on January 4, 2010.[4] The application covers missing people, killed people, refugees, expelled people and all military actions and concentration camps with historical account of World War II persecution of Serbs committed by the Independent State of Croatia, puppet state of Nazi Germany, and Ustaše during World War II.[5]

Both applications have a financial aspect, seeking compensation of damages. The President of Croatia, Stjepan Mesić said that "Serbia must pay the war reparations" while the Prime Minister of Serbia, Zoran Đinđić said that Croatia would have to pay reparations "for the expulsion of Serbian population and destruction of their property" noting that it could amount around 150 billion US dollars.[6]

Contents

Croatia v. Serbia

Croatia waited for the conclusion of the Bosnian Genocide Case against what was then Serbia and Montenegro before it proceeded with its own case. Sakib Softić, agent of Bosnia and Herzegovina in its case, has said that Croatia is in a much better position than his country was in its own court suit.[7]

Preliminary objection

The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia returned its preliminary objections on September 1, 2002[8] On November 18, 2008 the court decided on preliminary objections to the case filed by Serbia. The court ruled against Serbia's three objections to the case, while finding that one of these objections was not purely preliminary. Finally, the court decided that it has jurisdiction over the case.[2] Croatia was represented at the proceedings by its justice minister, Ivan Šimonović.[9] The decision made headlines in Croatia and Serbia, even more so because top Croatian politicians were that day in Vukovar, marking the anniversary of the city's fall in 1991 to Serb forces.[10]

Serbian officials sought from Croatia to withdraw the lawsuit several times. President of Serbia Boris Tadić said that "Serbia considered in previous years, and still believes, that it is always better for all conflicts from wars during the 1990s to be solved in extra-judicial processes, through peaceful means, however, for such an approach of Serbia, partners on the other side are needed" and the Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremić said that "I think it would be better for Croatia for it to never come to this process. Our main goal and wish is not to sue each other, but to cooperate on the road towards EU integration, to build good neighborly relations, to solve problems which we have inherited,".[11][12]

Serbia v. Croatia

Following the court ruling that it has the jurisdiction in Croatia's case, Serbian foreign minister Vuk Jeremić announced a plan to file a counter-suit against Croatia.[13] The application was submitted on January 4, 2010. The document will include information on crimes committed against Serbs of Croatia in Gospić, Sisak, Pakrac, Karlovac, Osijek, Paulin Dvor and during the operations Flash, Storm and Medak Pocket. The lawsuit also covers all those victims murdered after the war as they tried to return to their homes they left as refugees. The lawsuit against Croatia contains a historical account, with a focus on World War II persecution of Serbs.[4]

A public opinion poll in Serbia by Blic found that 69.7% of people supported a counter-suit, while 9.1% opposed it.[14] The lawsuit has been opposed by the minor opposition Liberal Democratic Party whose leader said that "Serbia needs a smart foreign policy, which will not respond with a mistake to a mistake that was made in the last century by Croatia".[15][16]

Timeline

Date Event
July 2, 1999 Croatia files against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
March 1, 2001 Croatia submits a memorial to the ICJ, ahead of the March 14 deadline to do so.
September 1, 2002 The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia submits a counter-memorial to the ICJ, ahead of the September 16 deadline to do so.
February 4, 2003 The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is reconstituted as Serbia and Montenegro.
April 25, 2003 Croatia submits its written statement, ahead of the April 29 deadline to do so.
June 5, 2006 Serbia and Montenegro separate into individual countries with Serbia succeeding the state in all legal capacity.
February 26, 2007 A judgment is delivered in the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro).
May 26–30, 2008 Public hearings on the preliminary objections in the case.
November 18, 2008 The court rules that it has jurisdiction over the case.
January 4, 2010 Serbia files a counter-memorial against Croatia.
December 20, 2010 Croatia's submits its reply to the Serbian counter-memorial on the day of the deadline to do so.
November 4, 2011 Serbia submits its rejoinder on the day of the deadline to do so.
Early 2013 Expected start of the hearing of the case.

See also

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Croatia–Serbia relations — Croatian Serbian relations Croatia …   Wikipedia

  • Croatia — …   Wikipedia

  • Genocide Convention — Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Signed 9 December 1948 Location Paris Effective 12 January 1951 Signatories 41 Parties 140 (Complete List) Depositary Secretary General of the United Nations The Convention on… …   Wikipedia

  • Génocide de Srebrenica — Massacre de Srebrenica Potočari 11. juillet 2007 …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Serbs of Croatia — …   Wikipedia

  • Croatian War of Independence — Part of the Yugoslav Wars …   Wikipedia

  • Greater Serbia — The term Greater Serbia or Great Serbia (Serbian: Велика Србија, Velika Srbija ) applies to the key current within Serbian nationalism.The postulated borders for the proposed state incorporate one vast and continuous stretch of land across south… …   Wikipedia

  • Gobierno de Salvación Nacional de Serbia — Влада Националног Спаса Vlada narodnog spasa Gobierno de Salvación Nacional Estado títere de la Alemania Nazi …   Wikipedia Español

  • Prijedor massacre — Location of Prijedor within Bosnia and Herzegovina Location Prijedor, Bosnia and Herzegovina …   Wikipedia

  • Genocides in history — Genocide is the mass killing of a group of people, as defined by Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG) as any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”