East Asian Yogācāra

Part of a series on Chinese Buddhism
History
Silk Road Transmission History of Chinese Buddhism
Major Figures
Kumārajīva • Xuanzang Huiyuan • Zhiyi • Bodhidharma Huineng • Hsu Yun Hsuan Hua • Nan Huaijin
Traditions
Chán • Tiantai • Huayan Pure Land • Weishi • Sanlun • Mizong
Texts
Chinese Buddhist canon Taishō Tripiṭaka
Architecture
Buddhist Architecture in China
Sacred Mountains
Wutai • Emei • Jiuhua • Putuo
Culture
Buddhist Association of China Cuisine • Martial arts • Diyu
v · d · e

East Asian Yogācāra refers to the traditions in East Asia which represent the Indian Yogācāra system of thought. It is a school of Buddhism originating in China. In China, it is known as Wéishí-zōng (唯識宗, "Consciousness Only" school), or Fǎxiàng-zōng (法相宗, "Dharma Characteristics" school). In Japan, it is known as Hossō-shū (法相宗^?) or Yuishiki-shū (唯識宗^?).

Etymology

The term Fǎxiàng itself was first applied to this tradition by the Huayan teacher Fazang (Ch. 法藏), who used it to characterize Consciousness Only teachings as provisional, dealing with the phenomenal appearances of the dharmas, in contrast to Huayan, which deals with the underlying nature on which such phenomenal appearances were based. However, Chinese proponents preferred the title Wéishí (Ch. 唯識), meaning "Consciousness Only" (Skt. Vijñaptimātra).

This school may also be called Wéishí Yújiāxíng Pài (唯識瑜伽行派 "Consciousness Only Yogācāra School") or Yǒu Zōng (有宗 "School of Existence"). Venerable Yin Shun also introduced a threefold classification for Buddhist teachings which designates this school as Xūwàng Wéishí Xì (虛妄唯識系 "False Imagination Mere Consciousness System").^[1]

Characteristics

Main articles: Yogācāra#Yogācāra_Tenets and Eight_Consciousnesses

Like the parent Yogacara school, the Faxiang school teachings that our understanding of reality comes from our own mind, rather than actual empirical experience. The mind distorts reality and projects it as reality itself.^[2] In keeping with Yogacara tradition, the mind is divided into the Eight Consciousnesses and the Four Aspects of Cognition which produce what we view as reality.

History in China

Early history and teachers

Translations of Indian Yogācāra texts were first introduced to China in the early 5th century CE.^[3] Among these was Guṇabhadra's translation of the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra in four fascicles, which would also become important in the early history of the Chán school.

During the 6th century CE, the Indian monk and translator Paramārtha widely propagated Yogācāra teachings in China. His translations include the Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra, the Madhyāntavibhāga-kārikā, the Triṃśikā-vijñaptimātratā, and the Mahāyānasaṃgraha.^[4] Paramārtha also taught widely on the principles of Consciousness Only, and developed a large following in southern China.^[5] Many monks and laypeople traveled long distances to hear his teachings, especially those on the Mahāyānasaṃgraha.^[6]

Xuanzang and Kuiji

Although Yogācāra teachings had been propagated widely, most look to Xuanzang as the most important founder of East Asian Yogācāra. At the age of 33, Xuanzang made a dangerous journey to India in order to study Buddhism there and to procure Buddhist texts for translation into Chinese.^[7] Xuanzang spent over ten years in India traveling and studying under various Buddhist masters.^[8] These masters included Śīlabhadra, the abbot of Nālandā, who was then 106 years old.^[9] Xuanzang was tutored in the Yogācāra teachings by Śīlabhadra for several years Nālandā. Upon his return from India, Xuanzang brought with him a wagon-load of Buddhist texts, including important Yogācāra works such as the Yogācārabhūmi-śastra.^[10] In total, Xuanzang had procured 657 Buddhist texts from India.^[11] Upon his return to China, he was given government support and many assistants for the purpose of translating these texts into Chinese.

As an important contribution to East Asian Yogācāra, Xuanzang composed the treatise Cheng Weishi Lun, or "Discourse on the Establishment of Consciousness Only."^[12] This work is framed around Vasubandhu's Triṃśikā-vijñaptimātratā, or "Thirty Verses on Consciousness Only." Xuanzang upheld Dharmapāla's commentary on this work as being the correct one, and provided his own explanations of these as well as other views in the Cheng Weishi Lun.^[13] This work was composed at the behest of Xuanzang's disciple Kuiji, and became a central representation of East Asian Yogācāra.^[14] Xuanzang also promoted devotional meditative practices toward Maitreya Bodhisattva. Xuanzang's disciple Kuiji wrote a number of important commentaries on the Yogacara texts and further developed the influence of this doctrine in China, and was recognized by later adherents as the first true patriach of the school.^[15]

Later history and the modern era

In time, Chinese Yogācāra was weakened due to competition with other Chinese Buddhist traditions such as Tiantai, Huayan, Chan, and Pure Land. Nevertheless, it continued to exert an influence, and Chinese Buddhists relied on its translations, commentaries, and concepts heavily, absorbing Yogācāra teachings into the other traditions.^[10] In the early part of the 20th century, the laymen Yang Wenhui and Ouyang Jian (Ch. 歐陽漸) (1871–1943) promoted Buddhist learning in China, and the general trend was for an increase in studies of Buddhist traditions such as Yogācāra, Sanlun, and Huayan.^[16][17] Ouyang Jian founded the Chinese Institute of Inner Studies (Ch. 支那內學院), which provided education in Yogācāra teachings and the Mahāyāna prajñā class of sūtras, given to both monastics and laypeople.^[18] Many modern Chinese Buddhist scholars are second-generation descendents of this school, or have been influenced by it indirectly.^[19]

History in Korea

The Consciousness Only teachings were transmitted to Korea as Beopsang. The most well known Korean figure of these teachings was Woncheuk, who studied under the Chinese monk Xuanzang. Woncheuk is well-known amongst scholars of Tibetan Buddhism for his Commentary on the Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra. While in China, Woncheuk took as a disciple a Korean-born monk named Dojeung (道證), who travelled to Silla in 692 and propounded and propagated Woncheuk's exegetical tradition there where it flourished.

In Korea, Beopsang teachings did not endure long as a distinct school, but as with China, its teachings were frequently included in later schools of thought.^[10]

History in Japan

The Consciousness Only teachings were transmitted to Japan as Hossō, and they made considerable impact. One of the founders of the Hossō sect in Japan was Kuiji.^[20] Although a relatively small Hossō sect exists in Japan to this day, the sect has survived long after it died out in Korea and China, though its influence has diminished as the center of Buddhist authority moved away from Nara, and with the rise of the Ekayana schools of Buddhism (Tendai, Zen, Pure Land, etc.).^[10] During its height, scholars of the Hossō school frequently debated with other emerging schools. Both the founder of Shingon Buddhism, Kūkai, and the founder of Tendai Buddhism, Saichō exchanged letters of debate with Hossō scholar Tokuitsu, which became particular heated in the case of Saichō.^[21] Nevertheless, the Hossō maintained amicable relations with the Shingon esoteric sect, and adopted its practices while providing further scholarship on Yogacara philosophy.

Hōnen, founder of the Jōdo-shū Pure Land sect, likewise sought advice from Hossō scholars of his time as a novice monk, and later debated with them after establishing his sect.^[22] Another Hossō scholar, Jōkei was among Hōnen's toughest critics, and frequently sought to refute his teachings, while simultaneously striving to make Buddhism more accessible to a wider audience as Hōnen by reviving devotion to Maitreya Bodhisattva and teaching followers the benefits of rebirth in the Tusita Heaven, rather than the Pure Land of Amitabha.^[23] Jōkei is also a leading figure in the efforts to revive monastic discipline at places like Toshodaiji, Kofukuji and counted other notable monks among his disciples, including Eison who founded the Shingon-Vinaya sect.^[24]

In Meiji Period Japan, as tourism became more common, the Hossō sect was the owner of several famous temples, notably Hōryū-ji and Kiyomizu-dera. However, as the Hossō sect had ceased Buddhist study centuries prior, the head priests were not content with giving part of their tourism income to the sect's organization. Following the end of World War II, the owners of these popular temples broke away from the Hossō sect, in 1950 and 1965, respectively. The sect still maintains Kōfuku-ji and Yakushi-ji.

Notes

1. ^ Sheng Yen. Orthodox Chinese Buddhism. 2007. p. 137
2. ^ Tagawa, Shun'ei (2009). Living Yogacara: An Introduction to Consciousness-Only Buddhism. Wisdom Publications. pp. 1–10. ISBN 0861715896. 
3. ^ Paul, Diana. Philosophy of Mind in Sixth-Century China: Paramartha's Evolution of Consciousness. 1984. p. 6
4. ^ Paul, Diana. Philosophy of Mind in Sixth-Century China: Paramartha's Evolution of Consciousness. 1984. pp. 30-32
5. ^ Paul, Diana. Philosophy of Mind in Sixth-Century China: Paramartha's Evolution of Consciousness. 1984. pp. 32-33
6. ^ Paul, Diana. Philosophy of Mind in Sixth-Century China: Paramartha's Evolution of Consciousness. 1984. pp. 32-33
7. ^ Liu, JeeLoo. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. 2006. p. 220
8. ^ Liu, JeeLoo. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. 2006. p. 220
9. ^ Wei Tat. Cheng Weishi Lun. 1973. p. li
10. ^ ^{a b c d} Tagawa, Shun'ei (2009). Charles Muller. ed. Living Yogacara: An Introduction to Consciousness-Only Buddhism. Wisdom Publications. p. xx-xxi (forward). ISBN 0861715896. 
11. ^ Liu, JeeLoo. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. 2006. p. 220
12. ^ Liu, JeeLoo. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. 2006. p. 221
13. ^ Liu, JeeLoo. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. 2006. p. 221
14. ^ Liu, JeeLoo. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. 2006. p. 221
15. ^ Lusthaus, Dan (undated). Quick Overview of the Faxiang School 法相宗. Source: [1] (accessed: December 12, 2007)
16. ^ Nan, Huai-Chin. Basic Buddhism: Exploring Buddhism and Zen. 1997. p. 142
17. ^ Sheng Yen. Orthodox Chinese Buddhism. 2007. p. 217
18. ^ Nan, Huai-Chin. Basic Buddhism: Exploring Buddhism and Zen. 1997. p. 141
19. ^ Nan, Huai-Chin. Basic Buddhism: Exploring Buddhism and Zen. 1997. p. 141
20. ^ Sho, Kyodai (2002). The Elementary-Level Textbook: Part 1: Gosho Study "Letter To The Brothers". SGI-USA Study Curriculum. Source: [2] (accessed: January 8, 2007)
21. ^ Abe, Ryuichi (1999). The Weaving of Mantra: Kukai and the Construction of Esoteric Buddhist Discourse. Columbia University Press. pp. 208–219. ISBN 0231112866. 
22. ^ "Life of Honen, Jodo Shu homepage Homepage". http://www.jodo.org/about_hs/ho_life.html. Retrieved 2009-07-01. 
23. ^ Ford, James (2009). "Chapter 6: Buddhist Ceremonials (Kōshiki) and the Ideological Discourse of Established Buddhism in Medieval Japan". In Payne, Richard K.; Leighton, Taigen Dan. Discourse and Ideology in Medieval Japanese Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 110–113. ISBN 0415544459. 
24. ^ Ford, James L. (2006). Jokei and Buddhist Devotion in Early Medieval Japan. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 132–134. ISBN 0195188144. 

References

• Lusthaus, Dan (undated). Quick Overview of the Faxiang School 法相宗. Source: [3] (accessed: December 12, 2007)

Further reading

• Paul Hoornaert. "Bhavaviveka's Critique against the "Vijnaptimatra" Doctrine". Journal of Indian and Buddhist studies 41.1 (1992).
• Sachiyoshi Minagawa. "Medieval Japanese Vijnaptimatra Thought--On nyakunmuro". Journal of Indian and Buddhist studies 46.2 (1998).
• Hiromi Yoshimura. "Plural Theories on Vijnaptimatra in the Mahayanasutralamkara". Journal of Indian and Buddhist studies 54.2 (2006).