Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point

Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point

When one becomes frustrated with the way a policy or guideline is being applied, it may be tempting to try to discredit the rule or interpretation thereof by, in one's view, enforcing it consistently. This may even entail an attempt to turn consensus against a policy by satirically applying it on various pages to show that it is ridiculous.

Such tactics are highly disruptive and can lead to a block (possibly indefinite) or ban. Issues with rules or practices should be addressed through plain discussion, not through parody or manipulation. If direct discussion fails to resolve a problem, look into dispute resolution.

Practically speaking, it is impossible for Wikipedia to be 100 percent consistent, and its rules will therefore never be perfect. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then consider leaving the issue alone and accepting that the outcome was not what you wanted. Do not resort to disruptive tactics in an attempt to sway consensus.

Examples

  • If you have nominated an article for deletion, and others vote to keep it...
    • do participate in the discussion, noting any examples of similar article subjects which consensus has rejected.
    • do not create an article on what you consider to be a similarly unsuitable topic just to get it listed for deletion and have others make the same arguments you are making.
  • If someone deletes from an article "unimportant" information which you consider to in fact be important to the subject...
    • do explain on the article's talk page why you feel the material merits inclusion
    • do not delete most of the remaining article as "unimportant".
  • If you have added a reference which someone then removes because the source is self-published...
    • do explain why the use of the source in question was appropriate in that instance, or find a reliable third-party published source for the information
    • do not summarily remove all references to self-published sources from an article
  • If you think someone unjustifiably removed "unsourced" content...
    • do find a source for it, make the referencing clear if it was already present, or explain why the content in question shouldn't require a cited source
    • do not remove all apparently unsourced content on the page
  • If you feel that a policy or guideline should be changed, and others disagree...
    • do explain what you see as the problem with the rule as written, and perhaps post a notice of the discussion at the Village pump
    • do not attempt to enforce the existing rule with the aim of provoking opposition to it
  • If you feel that it is too easy to add misinformation to Wikipedia...
    • do watch recent changes and fact-check anything that looks at all suspicious
    • do not create an elaborate hoax with hopes of getting publicity for it
  • If you think that this list of examples has become excessively long and boring...
    • do opine that the guideline's purpose would remain clear even if half of the examples were deleted
    • do not add 47 more examples just to show that people won't actually read such lists

Important note

Shortcut:
WP:NOTPOINTY

A commonly used shortcut to this page is WP:POINT. However, just because someone is making a point does not mean that they are disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate it. As a rule, one engaging in "POINTY" behavior is making edits which he or she does not really agree with, such as in the above examples.

See also

  • Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep, to minimize potential motivations for point-illustrating
  • Wikipedia:Be reasonable
  • Wikipedia:Gaming the system
  • Wikipedia:Wikilawyering
  • Past decisions by the Arbitration Committee regarding this guideline

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not — WP:NOT redirects here. For Wikipedia s notability guidelines, see Wikipedia:Notability. This page documents an English Wikipedia policy, a widely accepted standard that all editors should normally follow. Changes made to it should reflect… …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Glossary — Welcome to Wikipedia, which anyone can edit. Help index: Ask questions · Learn wikicode · View FAQ · Read Glossary · Live Wikipedia editing related help via web chat  …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Citing sources — Various shortcuts redirect here; you may be looking for Wikipedia:Reference desk, Wikipedia:Clean start, Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia or Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science. For a simpler introduction to citing sources, see Wikipedia:Referencing …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Disambiguation — WP:D redirects here. For information about deletion on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Deletion policy. This page documents an English Wikipedia editing guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is… …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Manual of Style — This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia s Manual of Style. Use common sense in applying it; it will have occasional exceptions. Please ensure that any edits to this page reflect consensus. Shortcuts …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music — This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia s Manual of Style. Use common sense in applying it; it will have occasional exceptions. Please ensure that any edits to this page reflect consensus. Shortcuts: WP:MOSMUSIC MO …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers — WP:DNB redirects here. For the WikiProject Dictionary of National Biography, see WP:WP DNB. Archives # 22 Feb 2003 31 Dec 2006 See also the Wikimedia essay, Always help out users …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Neutral point of view — Wikipedia:Point of view redirects here. For the essay on how to describe points of view, see Wikipedia:Describing points of view. To raise issues with specific articles, see the NPOV noticeboard. For advice on applying this policy, see the NPOV… …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Article titles — This page documents an English Wikipedia policy, a widely accepted standard that all editors should normally follow. Changes made to it should reflect consensus. Shortcuts: WP:TITLE WP:AT W …   Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia:Consensus — WP:CON redirects here; you may be looking for Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or Help:Edit conflict. This page documents an English Wikipedia policy, a widely accepted standard that all editors should normally follow. Changes made …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”