Motivations of Wikipedia contributors

Motivations of Wikipedia contributors

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone. The encyclopedia is maintained by volunteers who willingly edit and create articles with no monetary recompense. Several studies have been done into the motivations of Wikipedia contributors, including a collaborative survey by the Wikimedia Foundation and Collaborative Creativity Group at UNU-MERIT.[1]

Contents

Academic studies

Since the creation of Wikipedia in 2001, academics have been interested in what motivates people to contribute to the site. Several academic studies have been carried out in order to try to determine what these motivations are. While similar conclusions have been drawn between different studies, there have also been significant differences of opinion.

Heng-Li Yang and Cheng-Yu Lai

Yang and Lai's paper "Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors" hypothesised that because contributing to Wikipedia is voluntary, an individual's enjoyment of participating would be the highest motivator.[2] However, their study showed that although people might initially start editing Wikipedia out of enjoyment, the most likely motivation for continuing to participate is self-concept based motivations such as "I like to share knowledge which gives me a sense of personal achievement."[2]

Andrea Forte and Amy Bruckman

In 2005, Forte and Bruckman wrote a paper called "Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing" in which they discussed the possible motivations of Wikipedia contributors. They apply Latour and Woolgar's concept of the cycle of credit to Wikipedia contributors, suggesting that the reason that people write for Wikipedia is to gain recognition within the community.[3]

Oded Nov

In his 2007 paper "What Motivates Wikipedians", Oded Nov related the motivations of volunteers in general to the motivations of people who contribute to Wikipedia.[4] Nov carried out a survey using the six motivations of volunteers, identified in an earlier paper.[5] These six motivations are:

  • Values – expressing values to do with altruism and helping others
  • Social – engaging with friends, taking part in activities viewed favourably by others
  • Understanding – expanding knowledge through activities
  • Career – gaining work experience and skills
  • Protective – e.g. reducing guilt over personal privilege
  • Enhancement – demonstrating knowledge to others

To these six motivations he also added the following two:

  • Ideology – expressing support for what is perceived to be the underlying ideology of the activity (e.g. the belief that knowledge should be free)
  • Fun – enjoying the activity

The survey found that the most commonly indicated motives were "fun," "ideology," and "values," whereas the least frequently indicated motives were "career," "social," and "protective."[4]

Wikimedia surveys

The Wikimedia Foundation has carried out two surveys of Wikipedia contributors and users in 2010[1] and 2011.[6] The 2011 survey is the beginning of a process of semi-annual surveys in order to understand Wikipedia editors more and better cater to their needs.[7]

2008 survey

In 2008 the Wikimedia Foundation, alongside the Collaborative Creativity Group at UNU-Merit launched a survey of readers and editors of Wikipedia. This was the most comprehensive survey of Wikipedia ever conducted.[8]

The results of the survey were published two years later on March 24, 2010.[1]

Anecdotal evidence

Editors of Wikipedia have occasionally given personal testimonials of why they contribute to Wikipedia. A common theme of these testimonials is the enjoyment that editors seem to get from contributing to Wikipedia and being part of the Wikipedia community. Also mentioned is the potential addictive quality of editing Wikipedia. Gina Trapani of Lifehacker said "it turns out editing an article isn't scary at all. It's easy, surprisingly satisfying and can become obsessively addictive."[9] Jimmy Wales has also commented on the addictive quality of Wikipedia, saying "The main thing about Wikipedia [...] is that it’s fun and addictive".[10]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Ruediger Glott; Phillipp Schmidt, Rishab Ghosh. "Wikipedia Survey - Overview of Results". Wikipedia Study. UNU-MERIT. http://www.wikipediastudy.org/docs/Wikipedia_Overview_15March2010-FINAL.pdf. Retrieved 20 July 2011. 
  2. ^ a b Yang, Heng-Li; Lai, Cheng-Yu (November 2010). "Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors". Computers in Human Behavior 26 (6): 1377–1383. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.011. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563210000877. Retrieved 2 August 2011. 
  3. ^ Forte, Amy; Bruckman, Andrea (2005). "Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing". SIGGROUP 2005 Workshop: Sustaining community. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.120.7906&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Retrieved 9 August 2011. 
  4. ^ a b Nov, Oded (2007). [: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1297797.1297798 "What Motivates Wikipedians?"]. Communications of the ACM 50 (11): 60–64. doi:10.1145/1297797.1297798.
    http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1297797.1297798. Retrieved 11 August 2011. 
  5. ^ Clary, E; Snyder, M., Ridge, R., Copeland, J., Stukas, A., Haugen, J. and Miene, P. (1998). "Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach". J. Personality and Social Psychology 74: 1516–1530. 
  6. ^ Wikimedia Foundation. "Wikipedia editors do it for fun: First results of our 2011 editor survey". Wikimedia Foundation Blog. Wikimedia Foundation. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/06/10/wikipedia-editors-do-it-for-fun-first-results-of-our-2011-editor-survey/. Retrieved 2 August 2011. 
  7. ^ Wikimedia Foundation. "Launching our semi-annual Wikipedia editors survey". Wikimedia Foundation Blog. Wikimedia Foundation. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/04/18/launching-our-semi-annual-wikipedia-editors-survey/. Retrieved 2 August 2011. 
  8. ^ Moeller, Erik. "New Reports from November 2008 Survey Released". Wikimedia Foundation Blog. Wikimedia Foundation. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2010/04/02/new-reports-from-november-2008-survey-released/. Retrieved 11 August 2011. 
  9. ^ Trampani, Gina. "Geek to Live: How to contribute to Wikipedia". Lifehacker. Gawker Media. http://lifehacker.com/133747/geek-to-live--how-to-contribute-to-wikipedia. Retrieved 12 August 2011. 
  10. ^ Griffin, Ricky W. (2011). Management (10 ed.). Mason, OH. USA.: South-Western Cengage Learning. ISBN 1439080992. 

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Community of Wikipedia — Wikipedians redirect here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Wikipedians Community of Wikipedia Wikimania, an annual conference for users of Wikipedia and other projects operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. The community of Wikipedia is a loosely …   Wikipedia

  • English Wikipedia — Screenshot  …   Wikipedia

  • Reliability of Wikipedia — Vandalism of a Wikipedia article. The section on the left is the normal, undamaged version; and on the right is the edited, damaged version. The reliabili …   Wikipedia

  • Academic studies about Wikipedia — Content Production A minority of editors produce the majority of persistent content In a landmark peer reviewed paper,Reid Priedhorsky, Jilin Chen, Shyong (Tony) K. Lam, Katherine Panciera, Loren Terveen, John Riedl, Creating, destroying, and… …   Wikipedia

  • Online participation — Several motivations lead people to contribute to virtual communities. Various online media (i.e. Blogs, Chat rooms, Electronic mailing lists, Internet forums, Wikis), are becoming ever greater knowledge sharing resources. Many of these… …   Wikipedia

  • User-generated content — UGC redirects here. For other uses, see UGC (disambiguation). User generated content (UGC) covers a range of media content available in a range of modern communications technologies. It entered mainstream usage during 2005 having arisen in web… …   Wikipedia

  • Virtual community — For other uses, see Community (disambiguation). Sociology …   Wikipedia

  • Crowdsourcing — Wikipedians and British Museum curators collaborate on the article Hoxne Hoard in June 2010. Crowdsourcing is the act of sourcing tasks traditionally performed by specific individuals to a group of people or community (crowd) through an open call …   Wikipedia

  • On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences — URL oeis.org Created by Neil Sloane Launched 1996 ( …   Wikipedia

  • The Colbert Report — logo Genre Comedy, Satire, News parody …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”