Parker v. South Eastern Railway Company

Parker v. South Eastern Railway Company

"Parker v South Eastern Railway" (1877) 2 CPD 416 is a famous English contract law case on exclusion clauses where the court held that an individual cannot escape a contractual term by failing to read the contract but that a party wanting to rely on an exclusion clause must take reasonable steps to bring it to the attention of the customer.

Background

Mr. Parker left a bag in the cloakroom of a railway station. On depositing his bag and paying two pence he received a ticket, which, on its back, stated that the railway was excluded from liability for items worth £10 or more. Parker failed to read the clause as he thought the ticket was only a receipt of payment. (However, he admitted that he knew the ticket contained writing.) The question of law put to the court was whether the clause applied to Parker. At trial the jury found for Mr. Parker as it was reasonable for him not to read the ticket.

Judgment

The Court held that if Parker was aware the ticket contained writing, Mr. Parker would presumed to know of the existence of the clause. However, it also ruled that the railway must have shown that it went to reasonable efforts to bring the condition to Mr. Parker's attention. The Court ordered a retrial for the jury to consider whether reasonable notice was given.

ources

* http://www.droit.univ-paris5.fr/jebrana/FACS/common_law/01100.html (broken)

ee also

* "Olley v. Marlborough Court Hotel" (1949) another famous exclusion case


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • South Dakota — This article is about the U.S. state of South Dakota. For other uses, see South Dakota (disambiguation). State of South Dakota …   Wikipedia

  • Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway — Manchester,Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway Ltd Former type Private Industry Railway Fate Name Change …   Wikipedia

  • North Staffordshire Railway — Locale North Staffordshire United Kingdom Dates of operation 1845–1923 Successor London, Midland and Sco …   Wikipedia

  • Lehigh Valley Transit Company — Die Lehigh Valley Transit Company war ein Straßenbahnbetrieb in den US Bundesstaaten Pennsylvania und New Jersey. Neben städtischen Straßenbahnlinien in Allentown, Bethlehem, Easton und Phillipsburg betrieb das Unternehmen Überlandstraßenbahnen… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • United Kingdom company law — Beside the River Thames, the City of London is a global financial centre. Within the Square Mile, the London Stock Exchange lies at the heart of the United Kingdom s corporations. United Kingdom company law is the body of rules that concern… …   Wikipedia

  • River Don, South Yorkshire — River Don The River Don as it flows past Hillsborough Stadium. Origin Pennines …   Wikipedia

  • Columbia, South Carolina — For other uses, see Columbia (disambiguation). Columbia   State Capital   City of Columbia …   Wikipedia

  • Clunderwen railway station — Clunderwen The station as seen from platform 1 Location …   Wikipedia

  • Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [1949] 1 KB 532 Judge(s) sitting Denning LJ, Singleton LJ and Bucknill LJ Oll …   Wikipedia

  • McCutcheon v David MacBrayne Ltd — Isle of Islay Court House of Lords Citation(s) [1964] UKHL …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”