Nuclear family

Sociology
Portal
Theory · History
Positivism · Antipositivism Functionalism · Conflict theory Middle-range · Mathematical Critical theory · Socialization Structure and agency
Research methods
Quantitative · Qualitative Historical · Computational Ethnographic
Topics · Subfields
Cities · Class · Crime · Culture Deviance · Demography · Education Economy · Environment · Family Gender · Health · Industry · Internet Knowledge · Law · Medicine Politics · Mobility · Race and ethnicity Rationalization · Religion · Science Secularization · Social networks Social psychology · Stratification
Categories · Lists
Journals · Sociologists Article index · Outline
v · d · e

Nuclear family is a term used to define a family group consisting of a father and mother and their children, all exclusively sharing living quarters.^[1] This is in contrast to the smaller single-parent family, and to the larger extended family. Nuclear families typically center on a married couple, but not always;^[2] the nuclear family may have any number of children. There are differences in definition among observers; some definitions allow only biological children that are full-blood siblings,^[3] while others allow for a stepparent and any mix of dependent children including stepchildren and adopted children.^[4] Alternate definitions have included family units headed by same-sex parents,^[2] and perhaps additional adult relatives who take on a cohabiting parental role.^[5]

The concept of the nuclear family was first noticed in Western Europe in the 17th century. With the emergence of proto-industrialization and early capitalism, the nuclear family became a financially viable social unit.^[6]

The concept that a narrowly defined nuclear family is central to stability in modern society has been promoted by modern social conservatives in the United States, and has been challenged as historically and sociologically inadequate to describe the complexity of actual family relations.^[7]

Usage of the term

An American nuclear family composed of the mother, father, and children circa 1955

Merriam-Webster dates the term back to 1947,^[1] whilst the Oxford English Dictionary has a reference to the term from 1924; thus it is relatively new, although nuclear family structures themselves date back thousands of years.^[8][9] The term nuclear is used in its general meaning referring to a central entity or "nucleus" around which others collect.

In its most common usage, the term nuclear family refers to a household consisting of a father, a mother and their children^[10] all in one household dwelling.^[1] George Murdock, an early and influential observer of families, describes the term in this way:

The family is a social group characterized by common residence, economic cooperation and reproduction. It contains adults of both sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship, and one or more children, own or adopted, of the sexually cohabiting adults.^[11]

Many individuals are part of two nuclear families in their lives: the family of origin in which they are offspring, and the family of procreation in which they are a parent.^[12]

Compared to extended family

Main article: Extended family

An extended family group consists of non-nuclear (or "non-immediate") family members living together with nuclear (or "immediate") family members.

Changes to family formation

The popularity of the concept of the nuclear family in the West, as opposed to the traditional extended family living together, came about in the early 20th century, prompted in part by increased wages earned by the working class. This enabled more and more families to be economically independent, and thus to own their own home.^{[citation needed]}

Family arrangements in the US have become more diverse with no particular households arrangement being prevalent enough to be identified as the average; however, 70% of children in the US live in traditional two-parent families.^[13]

Current information from United States Census Bureau shows that 70% of children in the US live in traditional two-parent families, with 66% of those living with parents who are married, and 60% living with their biological parents, and that "the figures suggest that the tumultuous shifts in family structure since the late 1960s have leveled off since 1990."^[14]

If considered separate from couples without children, single-parent families, or unmarried couples with children, in the United States traditional nuclear families appear to constitute a minority of households with rising prevalence of other family arrangements. As of 2000, nuclear families with the original biological parents constituted roughly 24.1% of American households, compared to 40.3% in 1970.^[13] Roughly two-thirds of all children in the United States will spend at least some time in a single-parent household.^[15]

In the UK, the number of nuclear families fell from 39% of all households in 1968 to 28% in 1992. The decrease accompanied an equal increase in the number of single-parent households and the number of adults living alone.^[16]

According to some sociologists, "[The nuclear family] no longer seems adequate to cover the wide diversity of household arrangements we see today." (Edwards 1991; Stacey 1996). A new term has been introduced, postmodern family, which is meant to describe the great variability in family forms, including single-parent families and child-free couples."^[13]

According to Professor Wolfgang Haak of Adelaide University, the nuclear family is natural to Homo sapiens. A 2005 archeological dig in Elau, Germany, analyzed by Haak, revealed genetic evidence suggesting that the 13 individuals found in a grave were closely related. Haak said, "By establishing the genetic links between the two adults and two children buried together in one grave, we have established the presence of the classic nuclear family in a prehistoric context in Central Europe."^[17] However, even here the evidence suggests that the nuclear family was embedded with an extended family. The remains of three children (probably siblings based on DNA evidence) were found buried with a woman who was not their mother but may have been an "aunt or a step-mother."^[18]

American conservatism

Main article: Familialism

In the United States, the idea that the nuclear family is traditional is an important aspect of conservatism.^[19]

See also

• Astronaut family
• Complex family
• Human bonding
• Intentional community
• Hindu joint family
• Kibbutzim and families
• Sociology of the family
• Structural functionalism
• Family relationships

References

1. ^ ^{a b c} Merriam-Webster Online. ../ "Definition of nuclear family".
2. ^ ^{a b} "nuclear family". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2011. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/421619/nuclear-family. Retrieved 2011-07-24. 
3. ^ [1]
4. ^ Haviland, William A.; Prins, Harald E. L.; Walrath, Dana (2007). Cultural anthropology: the human challenge (12 ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 219. ISBN 0495095613. http://books.google.com/books?id=jxzZl460258C&pg=PA219. 
5. ^ “Strictly, a nuclear or elementary or conjugal family consists merely of parents and children, though it often includes one or two other relatives as well, for example, a widowed parent or unmarried sibling of one or other spouse”
   Sloan Work and Family Research Network, citing Parkin, R. (1997). Kinship: An introduction to basic concepts. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Retrieved July 24, 2011 from http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/glossary_entry.php?term=Nuclear%20Family,%20Definition%28s%29%20of
6. ^ Traditions and Encounters: A Brief Global History (New York: McGraw Hill, 2008).
7. ^ DePaulo, B. and Milardo, R. (2011). "Interview: Beyond the Nuclear Family".
8. ^ Grief, Avner (2005). "Family Structure, Institutions, and Growth: The Origin and Implications of Western Corporatism".
9. ^ Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance (2006). "Types of marriages in the Bible, and today".
10. ^ http://www.oxfordadvancedlearnersdictionary.com/dictionary/nuclear-family
11. ^ Murdock, George Peter (1965) [1949]. Social Structure. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0029222907. 
12. ^ Collins, Donald; Jordan, Catheleen; Coleman, Heather (2009). An Introduction to Family Social Work (3 ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 27. ISBN 0495601888. http://books.google.com/books?id=wx73jGq4_owC&pg=PA27. 
13. ^ ^{a b c} Williams, Brian; Stacey C. Sawyer, Carl M. Wahlstrom (2005). Marriages, Families & Intimate Relationships. Boston, MA: Pearson. ISBN 0-205-36674-0. 
14. ^ Roberts, Sam (February 25, 2008). "Most Children Still Live in Two-Parent Homes, Census Bureau Reports". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/21census.html?_r=1&oref=slogin. Retrieved 2008-03-05. 
15. ^ http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/modii/ii493007.html
16. ^ Pothan, Peter (September 1992). "Nuclear family nonsense". Third Way (Hymns Ancient & Modern) 15 (7): 25–28. http://books.google.com/books?id=pgPxQaF4bDAC&pg=PA25. 
17. ^ Haak, Wolfgang; Brandt, Herman; de Jong, Hylke N.; Meyer, C; Ganslmeier, R; Heyd, V; Hawkesworth, C; Pike, AW et al. (2008). "Ancient DNA, Strontium isotopes, and osteological analyses shed light on social and kinship organization of the Later Stone Age". PNAS 105 (47): 18226–18231. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807592105. PMC 2587582. PMID 19015520. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2587582. Retrieved 2008-11-18. 
18. ^ Balter, M. (2008) Prehistoric Family Values, ScienceNow Daily News, Nov. 17.
19. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=D89nSQMCBdoC&lpg=PA8&dq=conservative%20%22nuclear%20family%22&pg=PA8#v=onepage&q=conservative%20%22nuclear%20family%22&f=false

External links

• The Nuclear Family from Buzzle.com