Intermediate scrutiny

Intermediate scrutiny

Intermediate scrutiny, in U.S. constitutional law, is the middle level of scrutiny applied by courts deciding constitutional issues through judicial review. The other levels are typically referred to as rational basis review (least rigorous) and strict scrutiny (most rigorous).

Intermediate scrutiny is met if a regulation involves important governmental interests that are furthered by substantially related means. In the context of sex-based classifications, the intermediate scrutiny test applies not only to the federal government, but also to state and local governments (via the Fourteenth Amendment). It also applies to both legislative and executive action whether those actions be of a substantive or procedural nature.

A famous example of intermediate scrutiny comes from "Craig v. Boren", 429 US 190 (1976),which was the first case in which a majority of the United States Supreme Court determined that statutory or administrative sex classifications were subject to an intermediate standard of judicial review.

Regarding sex-based classifications, however, the U.S. Supreme Court, in "Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan", 458 U.S. 718 (1982), added the requirement that, to be valid, a sex-based classification requires an "exceedingly persuasive justification." In practice, this means that Court examinations of sex-based classifications are closer to strict scrutiny. The Court applied this additional prong in the education context in "United States v. Virginia", 518 U.S. 515 (1996) and "J.E.B. v. Alabama", 511 U.S. 127 (1994).

Restrictions based on illegitimacy have also been subjected to intermediate scrutiny in the Equal Protection context on the grounds that they involve sex discrimination (see "Caban v. Mohammed", 441 U.S. 380 (1979)). Intermediate scrutiny was briefly applied to race-based classifications in affirmative action programs established by the federal government in "Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC" (89-453), 497 U.S. 547 (1990). However, "Metro Broadcasting", only applied to classifications in broadcasting and was overruled by the Supreme Court in "Adarand Constructors v. Peña", 515 U.S. 200 (1995), which held that all race-based classifications must be subjected to strict scrutiny.

In the free speech context, intermediate scrutiny applies to regulation that does not directly target speech but has a substantial impact on a particular message. It applies to time, place, and manner restrictions on speech, for example, with the additional requirement of "adequate alternative channels of communication." In other words, if restricting the time, place, or manner of speech means that speech cannot take place at all, the regulation fails intermediate scrutiny. It has been used in "erogenous zoning" cases such as "Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.", 475 U.S. 41 (1986), that limit the concentration or require concentration of certain types of establishments. It has also been used for other types of content-neutral regulation, as well as for content-neutral speech compulsion. Intermediate scrutiny also applies to regulation of commercial speech, as long as the state interests in regulating relate to fair bargaining. Regulation for other reasons, such as protection of children, are subject to strict scrutiny.

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • intermediate scrutiny — A legal standard to determine the constitutionality of a statute, when the statute applies to a quasi suspect classification (such as gender). To determine if a statute passes the test, a court considers whether the statute involves important… …   Law dictionary

  • intermediate — in·ter·me·di·ate /ˌin tər mē dē ət/ adj 1: being or occurring at the middle place, stage, or degree or between extremes an intermediate order 2: of, relating to, or being a level of judicial scrutiny to ensure equal protection of the laws that is …   Law dictionary

  • scrutiny — scru·ti·ny / skrüt ən ē/ n pl nies: searching study or inquiry; specif: judicial investigation of the constitutionality of a statutory classification of persons under the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution see also intermediate 2,… …   Law dictionary

  • Strict scrutiny — is the most stringent standard of judicial review used by United States courts. It is part of the hierarchy of standards that courts use to weigh the government s interest against a constitutional right or principle. The lesser standards are… …   Wikipedia

  • strict scrutiny — strict scru·ti·ny n: the highest level of judicial scrutiny that is applied esp. to a law that allegedly violates equal protection in order to determine if it is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest see also intermediate 2,… …   Law dictionary

  • Equal Protection Clause — The Equal Protection Clause, part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, provides that no state shall… deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. [… …   Wikipedia

  • Suspect classification — In United States Supreme Court jurisprudence, Suspect classification is a classification of groups which meet a series of criteria suggesting they are likely the subject of discrimination. These classes receive closer scrutiny by courts when an… …   Wikipedia

  • Due process — is the legal code that the state must venerate all of the legal rights that are owed to a person under the principle. Due process balances the power of the state law of the land and thus protects individual persons from it. When a government… …   Wikipedia

  • Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County — Supreme Court of the United States Argued 4 November, 1980 Decided 23 March, 1981 Full case name Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County …   Wikipedia

  • United States v. Virginia — SCOTUSCase Litigants=United States v. Virginia ArgueDate=January 17 ArgueYear=1996 DecideDate=June 26 DecideYear=1996 FullName=United States, Petitioner v. Virginia, et al. USVol=518 USPage=515 Citation=116 S. Ct. 2264; 135 L. Ed. 2d 735; 1996… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”