Godfrey v. Demon Internet Service


Godfrey v. Demon Internet Service

Godfrey v. Demon Internet Service [1999] 4 All ER 342, [2001] QB 201 (QBD) was a landmark court case in the United Kingdom concerning online defamation.

Laurence Godfrey, a physics lecturer, learned that someone had posted a message to the Usenet discussion group "soc.culture.thai".

That message, sent by an unknown source, had been forged to appear to have been sent by Dr. Godfrey. On January 17, 1997, Godfrey contacted Demon Internet, one of the major Internet Service Providers in the Great Britain to inform them of the forged message and ask that it be deleted from Demon Internet's Usenet news server. Demon Internet declined to remove the message, which remained on its servers for ten additional days, at which time it was automatically deleted along with all other old messages. Godfrey sued for libel, citing Demon's failure to remove the forged message at the time of his initial complaint.

Ruling on a pre-trial motion, the court found that an Internet service provider can be sued for libel, and that any transmission by a service provider of a defamatory posting constituted a publication under defamation law. Demon thereafter entered into an out-of-court settlement that paid Godfrey £15,000 plus £250,000 for his legal expenses.cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |author= |coauthors= |title=Demon settles net libel case |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/695596.stm |publisher=BBC|date=30 March 2000 |accessdate=2007-10-23 ]

There have since appeared several misrepresentations of the second of the two interlocutory judgments of Mr Justice Morland in the (first) Godfrey v. Demon action. Having struck out the core of Demon's defence in his first judgment, Morland J considered a further application by the Defendant (Demon) to amend its defence to include a large number of extracts from other internet postings that the Defendant sought to claim were Laurence Godfrey's words.Fact|date=October 2007 It is emphasised that the Defendant merely alleged that these words were Godfrey's. The judge also makes this clear in his judgment by listing all the material in question under the headings “postings allegedly made by the Plaintiff …”Fact|date=October 2007

The judge described as "provocative" those words alleged by the Defendant to have been posted by Godfrey. At that time Godfrey had had no opportunity to admit or deny these allegations, since they were made by way of proposed amendments to the defence. However, in the event these allegations were not proven and at the conclusion of the case an agreed statement was made in open court in which it was stated (inter alia): “Demon is also here today ... to apologise to Dr Godfrey for not removing the postings from its servers and for alleging in his defence that Dr Godfrey had deliberately provoked them, a contention which it now withdraws”.

Laurence Godfrey commented that he was happy with the settlement. Godfrey was subsequently the plaintiff in a variety of other internet-based libel suits. [cite news |author= Jill Priluck |title=Free Speech, But Whose? |url=http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1998/07/13467 |publisher=Wired |id= |pages= |page= |date=June 7 1998|accessdate=2007-10-23 ]

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Demon Internet — Company logo Demon Internet is a British Internet Service Provider. It was one of the UK s earliest ISPs, especially targeting the dialup audience. It started on 1 June 1992 from an idea posted on CIX by Cliff Stanford of Demon Systems Ltd. The… …   Wikipedia

  • Online service provider law — is a summary and case law tracking page for laws, legal decisions and issues relating to online service providers, like the Wikipedia and internet service providers, from the viewpoint of an OSP considering its liability and customer service… …   Wikipedia

  • defamation — de·fa·ma·tion /ˌde fə mā shən/ n 1: communication to third parties of false statements about a person that injure the reputation of or deter others from associating with that person see also libel, slander; new york times co. v. sullivan in the… …   Law dictionary

  • United Kingdom — a kingdom in NW Europe, consisting of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: formerly comprising Great Britain and Ireland 1801 1922. 58,610,182; 94,242 sq. mi. (244,100 sq. km). Cap.: London. Abbr.: U.K. Official name, United Kingdom of Great… …   Universalium

  • The Archers — Infobox Radio Show show name = The Archers imagesize = 130x130px caption = The podcast picture of the soap other names = format = Soap Opera runtime = 15 minutes, later 12½ minutes country = flagcountry|United Kingdom language = English home… …   Wikipedia

  • Liste des films produits par Universal Pictures — Sommaire : Années 1920 Années 1930 Années 1940 Années 1950 Années 1960 Années 1970 Années 1980 Années 1990 Années 2000 Années 2010 Production Cette liste recense les films produits par le studio Universal Pictures par date de première sortie …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Mischa Auer — De g. à d. : Mischa Auer, Danielle Darrieux et Douglas Fairbanks Jr., dans La Coqueluche de Paris (1938) photo …   Wikipédia en Français

  • List of Mystery Science Theater 3000 episodes — This page is a list of episodes for the American TV series Mystery Science Theater 3000. In total, 198 episodes were broadcast from 1988 to 1999. Contents 1 Season index 2 Explanation of entries 3 KTMA TV …   Wikipedia

  • Ghostbusters — This article is about the 1984 film. For the franchise, see Ghostbusters (franchise). For other uses, see Ghostbusters (disambiguation). Ghostbusters Theatrical release poster …   Wikipedia

  • Cary Grant — Pour les articles homonymes, voir Grant et Leach. [style à revoir] Cary Grant …   Wikipédia en Français


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.