Wexis

Wexis is a humorous portmanteau used to refer to the alleged duopoly of publishing conglomerates that dominate the U.S. legal information services industry — namely, West Publishing and LexisNexis. [Jean McKnight, "Wexis versus the Net," "Illinois Bar Journal" 85, no. 4 (April 1997): 189-190.]

Neither of these companies is independent—they are parts of much larger conglomerates that dominate the entire information services sector. West is owned by Thomson Reuters, while LexisNexis is a division of Reed Elsevier.

Notably, these companies dispute the allegation that they are a duopoly; LexisNexis actually sued one company which used the terms "Wexis" and "duopoly" in its marketing literature. [Anonymous, "LexisNexis wins first phase of legal battle with competitor," "Business First-Columbus", 29 June 2001, A13.]

The United States district court imposed various requirements regarding the companies' operations in a consent decree resulting from an antitrust inquiry by the United States Department of Justice under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act in connection with Thomson's purchase of West Publishing, and West's and Lexis's settlement of various outstanding claims in that proceeding. [ [http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f2200/2225.htm Final Judgment: "U.S. v. The Thomson Corporation and West Publishing Company," Civil No.: 96-1415 (PLF), United States District Court for the District of Columbia, March 7, 1997] .] For example, West was required to license the "star pagination" in its printed reporters under certain terms. [Final Judgment, Part IX.] Otherwise, lawyers in jurisdictions that require citations to all official and unofficial reporters would have to subscribe to "both" online services to get all the necessary page numbers for citations in their briefs. The judge also had concerns about the Thomson and West products ordered to be divested being sold to Lexis, [ [http://hyperlaw.com/ustrans2.htm Transcript - Conference before Judge Friedman, February 6,1996 -- USA v. Thomson, 96 CV 1415, USDC District of Columbia] .] primarily statutory and case law publications of Lawyers Cooperative Publishing, such as "United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers Edition" and "United States Code Service", [Final Judgment, Part IV and Exhibit A1.] but those sales were approved.

Both companies are known for their aggressive marketing programs in American law schools. Law students may print documents for free that are obtained through their respective services. Both companies also have programs through which students may earn points (based on their number of searches) that can be redeemed for free gifts. [Maggie Rauch, "Court of appeal: legal information providers vie for student loyalty," "Incentive" 179, no. 3 (March 2005): 13.]

Wolters Kluwer is the largest company trying to establish a beachhead against the "Wexis" duopoly; it has taken over offline legal publishers like Aspen Publishing and online legal services like Loislaw, and owns Commerce Clearing House (CCH). [ [http://cch.com/about/ cch.com: About Us page] .] However, Wolters has not yet created a single brand for its online and offline legal offerings, and most importantly, it lacks a service that can directly compete against Westlaw's KeyCite or Shepard's Citations from LexisNexis. The Bureau of National Affairs is the best known of the remaining independent law publishing companies. Both BNA and CCH have arrangements with Lexis and Westlaw to publish their content though those electronic services, although they also provide their subscribers web access to certain publications. Independent American company Fastcase [https://www.fastcase.com/Corporate/Home.aspx] is another large legal research alternative, with more than 260,000 lawyers subscribed for free through their bar associations.Fact|date=May 2007

References