- Bart D. Ehrman
region = New Testament Studies
color = lightsteelblue
image_size = 200px
name = Bart D. Ehrman
birth = Unknown
Evangelical Christian-> New Testamenttextual critic -> agnostic
New Testamentauthentication, Historical Jesus, Lost Gospels, Early Christian writings
notable_ideas = Textual errors in the New Testament, Criterion of independent attestation, Criterion of dissimilarity, and Criterion of contextual credibility.
box_width = 26em
Bart D. Ehrman is an American
New Testamentscholar and textual critic of early Christianity. He is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professorand Chair of the Department of Religious Studiesat the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He has researched the source materials for the Bible. His research proposes that the Biblical text was unintentionally altered by scribes and intentionally altered for a variety of reasons.
Ehrman began studying the Bible and its original languages at the
Moody Bible Instituteand is a 1978 graduate of Wheaton Collegein Illinois. He received his Ph.D and M.Div. from Princeton Theological Seminary, where he studied under Bruce Metzger. He currently serves as the chairman of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He was the President of the Southeast Region of the Society of Biblical Literature, and worked closely as an editor on a number of the Society's publications. Currently, he co-edits the series "New Testament Tools and Studies".
Much of Ehrman's writing has concentrated on various aspects of
Walter Bauer's thesis that Christianity was always diversified or at odds with itself. Ehrman is often considered a pioneer in connecting the history of the early church to textual variants within biblical manuscripts and in coining such terms as " Proto-orthodox Christianity." In his writings, Ehrman has turned around textual criticism. From the time of the Church Fathers, it was the heretics (Marcion, for example) who were charged with tampering with the biblical manuscripts. Ehrman theorizes that it was more often the Orthodox that "corrupted" the manuscripts, altering the text to promote particular viewpoints. He has authored or contributed to nineteen books.
Ehrman became an Evangelical Christian as a teen. His desire to understand the original words of the Bible led him to the study of ancient languages and to textual criticism, to which he attributes the inspiration for an ongoing critical exploration of the basis of his own religious beliefs, which in turn gradually led to the questioning of his faith in the Bible as the inerrant, unchanging word of God. He now considers himself an
agnostic. [cite news |title=Q&A: Bart Ehrman: Misquoting Jesus |url=http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6301707.html |accessdate=2007-05-31] ["In the church of his youth in Lawrence [Kansas}, with nearly every pew at capacity last week, Bart D. Ehrman, chairman of the department of religious studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, announced that he was an agnostic. He joked that atheists think agnostics are wimpy atheists and that agnostics think atheists are arrogant agnostics." "Agnostic's questions have biblical answers," Vern Barnet, "Kansas City Star", 23 April 2008] Nevertheless, Ehrman has kept ongoing dialogue with evangelicals. In March 2006, he joined theologian William Lane Craigin public debate on the question "Is There Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus?" on the campus of the College of the Holy Cross. [ [http://www.holycross.edu/departments/crec/website/resurrdebate.htm "Is There Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus?"] From the website for The Holy Cross Center for Religion, Ethics and Culture.] In April of 2008, Ehrman and evangelical New Testament scholar Daniel B. Wallaceparticipated in a public dialogue on the textual reliability of the New Testament. [ [http://www.nola.com/religion/t-p/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1206768104253200.xml&coll=1 "Scholars to debate Bible, faith"] Nolan, Bruce. " The Times-Picayune". 2008-03-30. Accessed: 2008-03-30 [http://www.webcitation.org/5WiGViUyL Reference archived at WebCite®)] ]
In 2006, he appeared on "
The Colbert Report", as well as " The Daily Show", to promote his book " Misquoting Jesus".In 2007, he gave a speech at Stanford Universityin which he discussed the textual inconsistencies of the New Testament, and also took questions from the audience. He has also made several guest appearances on National Public Radio (NPR) including the show Fresh Airin February 2008 to discuss his book "God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question—Why We Suffer".
Professional awards received include the Students' Undergraduate Teaching Award, The Ruth and Philip Hettleman Prize for Artistic and Scholarly Achievement, and The Bowman and Gordon Gray Award for Excellence in Teaching.
Major themes of his works and useful terminology
Two major themes run throughout nearly all of his books and lectures. First is the desire to analyze the
historicityof claims made by ancient texts used in the creation of the New Testament, as well as many books left out of the Christian canon, and subject them to a series of criteria. Second is the desire to reveal the thousands of differences and changes in the texts some people take to be the inerrant and literal " Word of God," who it was that changed the originals (none of which have survived), and what motivations or theologicalbenefit could lie behind such changes being made.
Historicity of New Testament tradition
The first major theme in his books and lectures is to analyze the historical accuracy of ancient religious texts used in the creation of the
New Testament. Ehrman subjects them to a series of specific criteria. The criteria are as follows:
1. Criterion of independent attestation - the more sources that mention an event, the more likely it is to be historically accurate. Multiple witnesses are better than one witness. This is akin to
corroborating evidencein modern trials. [Ehrman, Bart (2002) "The Historical Jesus" Lecture 9. The Teaching Company Lectures.] It is worth noting here that since Matthew and Luke took many stories from Mark, those instances cannot be considered independently attested. It is also worth noting that just because an event or saying is found only in one source, that alone is not evidence that it is historically inaccurate. This criterion will, however, assist in determining where the information is on a spectrum of more or less likely to be authentic.
2. Criterion of dissimilarity - the more a witness or source makes claims counter to their vested interests, the more that testimony is likely to be true. [Ehrman, Bart (2002) "The Historical Jesus" Lecture 10. The Teaching Company Lectures.] This criterion is the most controversial of the three, and does not always properly apply to ancient sources, but is valuable nonetheless as one of the tools to evaluate historical reliability. In short, if a supposed saying or deed of Jesus seems to go against or does not support the supposed agenda of its record's author, then it is considered more likely to be historically accurate.
3. Criterion of contextual credibility - states that "the sayings, deeds, and experiences of Jesus must be plausibly situated in the historical context of first-century Palestine to be trusted as reliable." [Ehrman, Bart (2002) "The Historical Jesus" Lecture 10. The Teaching Company Lectures.] Whereas the first two criteria serve to place a tradition on a spectrum of more or less historically reliable, this criterion is used exclusively to argue against the historicity of a tradition.
What changes were made, by whom, and why?
A second major theme that runs through his more recent works is the analysis of why such biblical variations are there. The vast majority of the literally hundreds of thousands of differences are due to the unintentional mistakes of scribes. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/04/AR2006030401369.html "The Book of Bart."] Tucker, Neely. "
The Washington Post", 2006. Profile of Bart Ehrman, focusing on his personal beliefs and how he came to be an agnostic. Accessed: 2008-04-01] These variations have little to no effect on the meaning of the passages or core tenets of Christian dogma.Changes were made, however, that Ehrman believes with near certainty could not have been mistakes, but were in fact purposeful alterations by the early church fathers and theologians to mold the early Christian writings into what they felt they needed to support their agenda and/or interpretation of Christianity.
Two key examples will be given here to illustrate the critical nature of the variations. Two of the most striking additions that could not possibly be attributed to unintentional scribal error occur in the last 12 verses of the
Gospel of Markand in 1 John.
Gospel of Mark, Ehrman claims that the last 12 verses have been added on to the original text many years later. Unlike some other scribal errors that had little bearing on the major tenets of Christian dogma, this addition to the text has had vast ramifications. In Mark, Jesus' reappearance to his disciples is mentioned only in the 12 verses that were added to the original. Ehrman indicates that when one considers that the Gospel of Markis generally regarded to be the earliest of the three synoptic gospels, and most likely one of the primary sources for the Gospels of both Matthew and Luke, it becomes apparent that the addition of these 12 verses could have had a monumental effect.
In a review of "Misquoting Jesus", Daniel B. Wallace,Executive Director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, wrote,"Unfortunately, as careful a scholar as Ehrman is, his treatment of major theological changes in the text of the NT tends to fall under one of two criticisms: Either his textual decisions are wrong, or his interpretation is wrong." Wallace also wrote,"One almost gets the impression that he is encouraging the Chicken Littles in the Christian community to panic at data that they are simply not prepared to wrestle with." [http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/2006/03/misanalyzing-text-criticism-bart.html] [ Wallace, Daniel B, [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3817/is_200606/ai_n17176283/pg_1?tag=artBody;col1 "The Gospel According to Bart: A Review Article of Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman,"] "Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society", June 2006 (also available at [http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=4000 Bible.org] )] Ehrman's conclusions have also been challenged
Craig Blombergand Thomas Howe. [Craig L. Blomberg, [http://www.denverseminary.edu/article/misquoting-jesus-the-story-behind-who-changed-the-bible-and-why/ "Review of Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why,"] Denver Seminary, February 2006] [Thomas Howe, [http://www.isca-apologetics.org/A%20Response%20to%20Bart%20Ehrman.pdf "A Response to Bart Ehrman's Misquoting Jesus,"] "International Society of Christian Apologetics,"]
It has also been claimed that much of Ehrman's contention with the veracity of the biblical manuscripts stems from assumptions he had as an evangelical Christian about what is meant by
biblical inerrancy, as well as what is meant by the claim that the New Testament writings were divinely inspired by God. [http://www.lifeway.com/lwc/article_main_page/0%2C1703%2CA%25253D162018%252526M%25253D200789%2C00.html?] Various Christian denominations have a different view of inerrancy than Ehrman did (sometimes using the term "infallible" instead), as well as a different understanding of what divine inspiration entails, [http://www.reformed.org/documents/index.html?mainframe=http://www.reformed.org/documents/icbi.html] and are thus precluded from having to wrestle with many of the problems Ehrman had been unprepared to deal with.
Ehrman has two children, a daughter, Kelly, and a son, Derek. After divorcing his first wife, he married Sarah Beckwith (Ph.D.,
King's College London), Marcello Lotti Professor of English at Duke University. He lives in Durham, North Carolina.
*cite book | title=God's Problem|God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question – Why We Suffer | publisher=HarperOne, USA | year=2008 | id=ISBN 0-06-117397-5
*cite book | title=The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2006 | id=ISBN 0-19-531460-3
*cite book | title=Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene: The Followers of Jesus in History and Legend | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2006 | id=ISBN 0-19-530013-0
*cite book | title=
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why | publisher=HarperSanFrancisco | year=2005 | id=ISBN 0-06-073817-0
*cite book | last=Metzger | first=Bruce M.| coauthors=Ehrman, Bart | title=The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2005 | id=ISBN 0-19-516667-1
*cite book | title=Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code: A Historian Reveals What We Really Know about Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Constantine | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2004 | id=ISBN 0-19-518140-9
*cite book | title=A Brief Introduction to the New Testament | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2004 | id=ISBN 0-19-516123-8
*cite book | title=Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2003 | id=ISBN 0-19-514183-0
*cite book | title=The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2003 | id=ISBN 0-19-515462-2
*cite book | last=Ehrman | first=Bart | coauthors=Jacobs, Andrew S. | title=Christianity in Late Antiquity, 300-450 C.E.: A Reader | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2003 | id=ISBN 0-19-515461-4
*cite book | title=The Apostolic Fathers: Volume II. Epistle of Barnabas. Papias and Quadratus. Epistle to Diognetus. The Shepherd of Hermas | publisher=Harvard University Press | year=2003 | id=ISBN 0-674-99608-9
*cite book | title=The Apostolic Fathers: Volume I. I Clement. II Clement. Ignatius. Polycarp. Didache | publisher=Harvard University Press | year=2003 | id=ISBN 0-674-99607-0
*cite book | title=The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2003 | id=ISBN 0-19-515464-9
*cite book | title=Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2003 | id=ISBN 0-19-514182-2
*cite book | title=Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=1999 | id=ISBN 0-19-512474-X
*cite book | title=After the New Testament: A Reader in Early Christianity | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=1998 | id=ISBN 0-19-511445-0
*cite book | title=The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=1996 | id=ISBN 0-19-510279-7
*cite book | title=The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis | publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company | year=1995 | id=ISBN 0-80284-824-9
*cite book | title=Didymus the Blind and the Text of the Gospels (The New Testament in the Greek Fathers; No. 1) | publisher=Society of Biblical Literature | year=1987 | id=ISBN 1-55540-084-1
* [http://www.bartdehrman.com Bart Ehrman's Official Website]
* [http://www.bartdehrman.com/biography.htm Bart Ehrman's Biography]
* [http://www.bartehrmanbooks.com Oxford University Press] Small web page provided by publisherAppearances & Interviews:
* [http://www.bartdehrman.com/flv_comedycentral/comedy_central.htm Ehrman on The Daily Show with John Stewart]
* [http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/player.jhtml?ml_video=70912 Ehrman on The Colbert Report with Stephen Colbert]
* [http://blog.oup.com/oupblog/2006/10/a_few_questions.html A Q&A session with Bart]
* [http://www.bartdehrman.com/mp3_20080219_fa_05/20080219_fa_05.htm Ehrman confronts Christianity on Why We Suffer] NPR featuring
Fresh Airfrom WHYY-FMwith Terri Gross
* [http://www.bartdehrman.com/flv_heyns_lecture/heyns_lecture.htm Ehrman speaks at Stanford University] Full 01:39:15 Video
The Teaching CompanyCourses:
* [http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=656 Bart Ehrman - New Testament]
* [http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=643 Bart Ehrman - Historical Jesus]
* [http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=6299 Bart Ehrman - History of the Bible: The Making of the New Testament Canon]
* [http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=6593 Bart Ehrman - Lost Christianities: Christian Scriptures and the Battles over Authentication]
* [http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=6537 Bart Ehrman - After the New Testament: The Writings of the Apostolic Fathers]
* [http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=6577 Bart Ehrman - From Jesus to Constantine: A History of Early Christianity]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Bart D. Ehrman — (2008) Bart D. Ehrman (* 5. Oktober 1955 in Lawrence, Kansas) ist ein US amerikanischer Religionswissenschaftler. Seinen Thesen zufolge wurden die Texte der Bibel im Laufe der Jahrhunderte verändert, unbeabsichtigt und aus verschiedenen Gründen… … Deutsch Wikipedia
Bart Ehrman — Saltar a navegación, búsqueda Bart D. Ehrman es un erudito sobre el Nuevo Testamento y experto en el paleocristianismo. Recibió su Ph.D y Magíster en Divinidad del Seminario Teológico de Princeton donde estudió bajo Bruce Metzger. Actualmente es … Wikipedia Español
Ehrman — ist der Familienname folgender Personen: Bart D. Ehrman (* 1955), US amerikanischer Religionswissenschaftler John Ehrman (1920–2011), britischer Historiker Riccardo Ehrman (* 1929), italienischer Journalist Siehe auch: Ehrmann … Deutsch Wikipedia
Bart — can refer to:Given namesAs a given name Bart is a diminutive of Bartholomew and may refer to: *Bart Berman (born 1938), a Dutch Israeli pianist and composer *Bart D. Ehrman, an American New Testament scholar *Bart Sibrel, an American conspiracy… … Wikipedia
Bart Ehrman — In diesem Artikel oder Abschnitt fehlen folgende wichtige Informationen: Geburtstag, Geburtsort, etc. Du kannst Wikipedia helfen, indem du sie recherchierst und einfügst. Karl Heinz 21:07, 26. Jun. 2008 (CEST) … Deutsch Wikipedia
Historicity of Jesus — This article is about the basis for holding the view that Jesus existed as portrayed in the Bible. For the view that Jesus may be a fictitious figure, see Jesus myth theory. For critical reconstructions of Jesus, see Historical Jesus. For the… … Wikipedia
Misquoting Jesus — Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why … Wikipedia
Gospel of Mark — Books of the New Testament … Wikipedia
Jesus — This article is about Jesus of Nazareth. For other uses, see Jesus (disambiguation). Jesus … Wikipedia
New Testament — This article is about part of the Christian Bible. For the theological concept, see New Covenant. Books of the New Testament … Wikipedia