Involuntary treatment

Involuntary treatment

Involuntary treatment (also referred to by proponents as assisted treatment and by critics as forced drugging) refers to medical treatment undertaken without a person's consent. In almost all circumstances, involuntary treatment refers to psychiatric treatment administered despite an individual's objections. These are typically individuals who have been diagnosed with a mental illness and are deemed by a court to be a danger to themselves or others.

United States

Limitations on forcible treatment

In 1975, the United States Supreme Court ruled in "O'Connor v. Donaldson" that involuntary hospitalization and/or treatment violates an individual's civil rights. The individual must be exhibiting behavior that is a danger to himself or others and a court order must be received for more that a 72 hour hold. The treatment must take place in the least restrictive setting possible. This ruling has severely limited involuntary treatment and hospitalization in the United States. [cite web
year=
month=
url=http://www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/LegalResources/CaseLaws/Case1.htm
title=O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975)
publisher=
accessdate=2007-10-02
] The statutes vary somewhat from state to state. [cite web
year=
month=
url=http://www.psychlaws.org/LegalResources/index.htm#statutes
title=Legal standard/requirements for assisted treatment, by state
publisher=
accessdate=2007-10-02
]

In 1979, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit established in "Rogers v. Okin" that a competent patient committed to a psychiatric hospital has the right to refuse treatment in non-emergency situations. The case of "Rennie v. Klein" established that an involuntarily committed individual has a constitutional right to refuse psychotropic medication without a court order. [cite web
url=http://www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/LegalResources/CaseLaws/Case6.htm
title=Rennie v. Klein, 462 F. Supp. 1131 (D.N.J. 1978)
publisher=treatmentadvocacycenter.org
accessdate=2007-10-09
] "Rogers v. Okin" established the patient's right to make treatment decisions.

Additional U.S. Supreme Court decision have added more restraints to involuntary commitment and treatment. "Foucha v. Louisiana" established the unconstitutionality of the continued commitment of an insanity aquittee who was not suffering from a mental illness. In"Jackson v. Indiana" the court ruled that a person adjudicated incompetent could not be indefinitely committed. In "Perry v. Louisiana" the court struck down the forcible medication of a prisoner for the purposes of rendering him competent to be executed. In "Riggins v. Nevada" the court ruled that a defendant had the right to refuse psychiatric medication while he was on trial, given to mitigate his psychiatric symptoms. "Sell v. United States" severely limited the ability of a psychiatric hospital to forcibly medicate a patient. In "Washington v. Harper" the Supreme Court upheld the involuntary medication of prisoners in a correctional facility inmates only under certain conditions as determined by established policy and procedures. [cite web
url=http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/legal/l1990/Harper.htm
title=Washington' et al, Petitioners v. Walter Harper
publisher=
accessdate=2007-10-10
]

Justifications and criticisms

Justification for involuntary treatment is often attempted by emphasizing the potential for severe consequences that may result from lack of treatment, such as homelessness, victimization, suicide, violence. However, critics argue that psychiatric treatment can also have severe consequences such as misdiagnosis [http://www.psychologytoday.com/htdocs/prod/PTOArticle/PTO-20030624-000001.asp] , psychiatric assault and disabling drug side effects.

Involuntary treatment is generally undertaken at the behest of family members. Supporters of involuntary treatment include mainstream organizations such as the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) and the American Psychiatric Association. Involuntary treatment's biggest supporter in the United States is the Treatment Advocacy Center.

Anti-psychiatry groups, loosely allied with members of the psychiatric survivors movement, vigorously oppose involuntary treatment on civil rights grounds. Also, critics oppose involuntary treatment because of the significant potential for side effects, ranging from mild to severe structural brain damage [ [http://psychrights.org/Research/Digest/NLPs/MonkeysonNeuroleptics.pdf Effect of Chronic Exposure to Antipsychotic Medication on Cell Numbers in the Parietal Cortex of Macaque Monkeys] , by Glenn T Konopaske, Karl-Anton Dorph-Petersen, Joseph N Pierri, Qiang Wu, Allan R Sampson and David A Lewis, Neuropsychopharmacology, 2006, 1-8.] [ [http://psychrights.org/Research/Digest/NLPs/ICP2005BonelliNLapoptosis.pdf The influence of psychotropic drugs on cerebral cell female neurovulnerability to antipsychotics] , by Raphael M. Bonelli, Peter Hofmann, Andreas Aschoff, Gerald Niederwieser, Clemens Heuberger, Gustaf Jirikowski and Hans-Peter Kapfhammer, International Clinical Psychopharmacology 2005, 20:145-149] , and because of its emphasis upon enforcing compliance via chemical restraints over practices aimed at achieving mental health. Critics, such as the New York Civil Liberties Union, have denounced the strong racial and socioeconomic biases in forced treatment orders. [New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, Inc., "Implementatation of Kendra's Law is Severely Biased" (April 7, 2005) [http://nylpi.org/pub/Kendras_Law_04-07-05.pdf http://nylpi.org/pub/Kendras_Law_04-07-05.pdf] (PDF)] [NYCLU Testimony On Extending Kendra's Law [http://www.nyclu.org/aot_program_tstmny_040805.html http://www.nyclu.org/aot_program_tstmny_040805.html] ]

The Church of Scientology is also aggressively opposed to involuntary treatment. In the United States case law ruling have almost eliminated the legal right to involuntarily treat a patient or incarcerated inmate in non-emergency situations, starting in 1975 with "O'Connor v. Donaldson", "Rennie v. Klein" in 1978 and "Rogers v. Okin" in 1979, and continuing with "Washington v. Harper" (1990), to name a few.

Methods

Psychiatric treatment primarily involves psychotropic medications, such as antidepressants, mood stabilizers, tranquillizers and 'anti-psychotic' or neuroleptic medication. These medications are generally considered effective by the medical community in treating severe and persistent mental illness [http://www.nimh.nih.gov/publicat/medicate.cfm#ptdep1] although they have common adverse side effects. Opponents of treatment point to other studies that suggest that long-range outcomes are much worse with treatment. [http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/08/29a.php] Involuntary treatment can also include commitment to a psychiatric ward and electroconvulsive therapy (also known as electroshock).

Mental health law

All but four states in the US allows for some form of involuntary treatment for short periods of time under emergency conditions, although criteria vary. [http://www.psychlaws.org/LegalResources/Index.htm#statutes] Since the late 1990s, a growing number of states have adopted "Assisted Outpatient Commitment (AOC)" laws. [http://www.psychlaws.org/GeneralResources/fact13.htm]

Under 'assisted' outpatient commitment, people committed involuntarily can live outside the psychiatric hospital, sometimes under strict conditions including reporting to mandatory psychiatric appointments, taking psychiatric drugs in the presence of a nursing team, and proving medication blood levels. Forty-two states presently allow for outpatient commitment. [http://www.psychlaws.org/LegalResources/statechart.htm]

Effects of involuntary medication

In some studies, the majority of people retrospectively agreed that involuntary medication had been in their best interest, with little or no consideration given to those who disagreed with their treatment. Anecdotal reports from opponents of involuntary medication, indicating that involuntary treatment has widespread, devastating, and lasting effects, are downplayed by studies cited by supporters, including TAC. [http://www.psychlaws.org/BriefingPapers/BP2.htm] However, other studies cast much doubt on the efficacity of involuntary treatment. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/queryd.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16034930&itool=pubmed_docsum]

ee also

* Anti-psychiatry
* E. Fuller Torrey
* Involuntary commitment – a long and detailed article dealing also with political imprisonment
* Laura's Law
* Medical ethics
* MindFreedom International
* New Freedom Commission on Mental Health
* Social control
* DSM-IV Codes
* Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV "(SCID)"

elected bibliography

* Appel, JM. The Forcible Treatment of Criminal Defendants. "Med & Health, RI." Nov. 2003.

References

External links

* [http://www.mhselfhelp.org/ National Mental Health Consumers' Self-Help Clearinghouse]
* [http://www.psychlaws.org/GeneralResources/article218.htm Psychlaws.org] - 'Keys to Commitment' (a guide for family members), Robert J. Kaplan, JD
* [http://www.psychlaws.org/LegalResources/CaseLaws/Case3.htm Rogers Law] , concerning involuntary treatment/commitment in Massachusetts


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Involuntary commitment — For involuntary treatment in non hospital settings, see involuntary treatment. Involuntary commitment or civil commitment is a legal process through which an individual with symptoms of severe mental illness is court ordered into treatment in a… …   Wikipedia

  • Treatment Advocacy Center — The Treatment Advocacy Center (TAC) is a United States nonprofit organization founded in 1998 by schizophrenia researcher E. Fuller Torrey and was originally part of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). TAC s focus is on promoting laws …   Wikipedia

  • Treatment of bipolar disorder — This article is an expansion of a section entitled Treatment from within the main article: Bipolar disorder The emphasis of the treatment of bipolar disorder is on effective management of the long term course of the illness, which can involve… …   Wikipedia

  • Involuntary celibacy — (or incel) is the state of a person who has not established an intimate relationship or engaged in sexual intercourse for reasons other than voluntary celibacy or sexual abstinence. The term is used especially for adults who, despite general… …   Wikipedia

  • Treatment of schizophrenia — The concept of a cure as such in the treatment of schizophrenia remains controversial, as there is no consensus on the definition of treatment in the case of schizophrenia, although some criteria for the remission of symptoms have recently been… …   Wikipedia

  • Treatment of multiple sclerosis — Several therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) exist, although there is no known cure. Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease that affects the central nervous system (CNS). The most common initial course of the disease… …   Wikipedia

  • Treatment of ulcerative colitis — This article concerns the treatment of ulcerative colitis, a form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Ulcerative colitis is a form of colitis, a disease of the intestine, specifically the large intestine or colon, that includes characteristic… …   Wikipedia

  • involuntary intoxication — Drunkenness characterized by an absence of exercise of independent judgment and volition in taking the intoxicant, as where intoxication results from taking drugs prescribed for medical treatment or from deception respecting the character of the… …   Ballentine's law dictionary

  • 5150 (Involuntary psychiatric hold) — Section 5150 is a section of the California Welfare and Institutions Code (specifically, the Lanterman–Petris–Short Act or LPS ) which allows a qualified officer or clinician to involuntarily confine a person deemed to have a mental disorder that …   Wikipedia

  • Electroconvulsive therapy — Intervention ICD 10 PCS GZB ICD 9 CM 94.27 …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”