American Convention on Human Rights


American Convention on Human Rights

Infobox Treaty
name = American Convention on Human Rights
long_name =


image_width = 200px
caption =
type =
date_drafted =
date_signed = 1969
location_signed = San José, Costa Rica
date_sealed =
date_effective = 18 July 1978
condition_effective = 11 ratifications
date_expiration =
signatories =
parties = 24
depositor =
language =
languages =
website =
wikisource =
The American Convention on Human Rights (also known as the Pact of San José) is an international human rights instrument.It was adopted by the nations of the Americas meeting in San José, Costa Rica, in 1969. It came into force after the eleventh instrument of ratification (that of Grenada) was deposited on 18 July 1978.

The bodies responsible for overseeing compliance with the Convention are the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, both of which are organs of the Organization of American States (OAS).

Content and purpose

According to its preamble, the purpose of the Convention is "to consolidate in this hemisphere, within the framework of democratic institutions, a system of personal liberty and social justice based on respect for the essential rights of man."

Chapter I establishes the general obligation of the states parties to uphold the rights set forth in the Convention to all persons under their jurisdiction, and to adapt their domestic laws to bring them into line with the Convention. The 23 articles of Chapter II give a list of individual civil and political rights due to all persons, including the right to life "in general, from the moment of conception", to humane treatment, to a fair trial, to privacy, to freedom of conscience, freedom of assembly, freedom of movement, etc. The single article in Chapter III deals with economic, social, and cultural rights. The somewhat cursory treatment given to this issue here was expanded some ten years later with the Protocol of San Salvador (see below).

Chapter IV describes those circumstances in which certain rights can be temporarily suspended, such as during states of emergency, and the formalities to be followed for such suspension to be valid. Chapter V, with a nod to the balance between rights and duties enshrined in the earlier American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, points out that individuals have responsibilities as well as rights.

Chapters VI, VII, VIII, and IX contain provisions for the creation and operation of the two bodies responsible for overseeing compliance with the Convention: the Inter-American Commission, based in Washington, D.C., United States, and the Inter-American Court, headquartered in San José, Costa Rica.

Chapter X deals with mechanisms for ratifying the Convention, amending it or placing reservations in it, or denouncing it. Various transitory provisions are set forth in Chapter XI.

Additional Protocols

In the ensuing years, the states parties to the American Convention have supplemented its provisions with two additional protocols.

The first, the Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (more commonly know as the "Protocol of San Salvador"), was opened for signature in the city of San Salvador, El Salvador, on 17 November 1988. It represented an attempt to take the inter-American human rights system to a higher level by enshrining its protection of so-called second-generation rights in the economic, social, and cultural spheres. The protocol's provisions cover such areas as the right to work, the right to health, the right to food, and the right to education. It came into effect on 16 November 1999 and has been ratified by Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, and Uruguay. [ [http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/a-52.html Additional Protocol to the American Convention On Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights ("Protocol of San Salvador")] ]

The second, the Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights to Abolish the Death Penalty, was adopted at Asunción, Paraguay, on 8 June 1990. While Article 4 of the American Convention had already placed severe restrictions on the states' ability to impose the death penalty – only applicable for the most serious crimes; no reinstatement once abolished; not to be used for political offenses or common crimes; not to be used against those aged under 18 or over 70, or against pregnant women – signing this protocol formalizes a state's solemn commitment to refrain from using capital punishment in any peacetime circumstance. To date it has been ratified by Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Venezuela. [ [http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/Sigs/a-53.html Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights to Abolish the Death Penalty] ]

Ratifications

At present, 24 of the 35 OAS's member states are parties to the Convention [ [http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/b-32.html American Convention on Human Rights ("Pact of San José")] ] :

Trinidad and Tobago suspended its ratification on 26 May 1998 (effective 26 May 1999) over the death penalty issue.

The treaty is open to all OAS member states, although to date it has not been ratified by Canada or several of the English-speaking Caribbean nations; the United States signed it in 1977 but has not proceeded with ratification.

Canada did at one point seriously consider ratification, but has decided against it, despite being in principle in favour of such a treaty. The ACHR, having been largely drafted by the predominantly Roman Catholic nations of Latin America, contains anti-abortion provisions, specifically, Article 4.1:cquote|Every person has the right to have his life respected. This right shall be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life. This conflicts with the current legality of abortions in Canada. Although Canada could ratify the convention with a reservation with respect to abortion (as did Mexico [ [http://www.cidh.org/Basicos/English/Basic4.Amer.Conv.Ratif.htm Basic Documents: Ratifications of the Convention] ] ), that would contradict Canada's stated opposition to the making of reservations to human rights treaties. Another solution would be for the other states to remove the anti-abortion provisions, but that is unlikely to occur due to strong Catholic feeling in those countries.

Notes

External links

* [http://www.cidh.org/Basicos/English/Basic3.American%20Convention.htm American Convention on Human Rights (text)]
* [http://www.cidh.org/Basicos/basic5.htm Additional Protocol on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (text)]
* [http://www.cidh.org/Basicos/basic7.htm Protocol to Abolish the Death Penalty (text)]
* [http://www.cidh.org Inter-American Commission on Human Rights]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • European Convention on Human Rights — ECHR redirects here. For the Court which enforces the Convention, see European Court of Human Rights. Not to be confused with European Convention (1999 2000) or Convention on the Future of Europe. European Convention on Human Rights The… …   Wikipedia

  • Inter-American Commission on Human Rights — Abbreviation IACHR Formation 1959 Purpose/focus Human Rights monitoring in the Americas Location Washington, D.C., United States …   Wikipedia

  • Inter-American Court of Human Rights — The Inter American Court of Human Rights is an autonomous judicial institution based in the city of San José, Costa Rica. Together with the Inter American Commission on Human Rights, it makes up the human rights protection system of the… …   Wikipedia

  • Human rights — Rights Theoretical distinctions Natural and legal rights Claim rights and liberty rights Negative and positive rights Individual an …   Wikipedia

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child — Signed 20 November 1989[1] Location New York[1] Effective 2 September 1990[1] Condition 20 ratifications …   Wikipedia

  • Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities —   states parties …   Wikipedia

  • Human rights in the United States — In 1776, Thomas Jefferson proposed a philosophy of human rights inherent to all people in the Declaration of Independence, asserting that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that… …   Wikipedia

  • human rights — fundamental rights, esp. those believed to belong to an individual and in whose exercise a government may not interfere, as the rights to speak, associate, work, etc. [1785 95] * * * Rights that belong to an individual as a consequence of being… …   Universalium

  • Human rights in Peru — Several issues were bring to Peruvian justice courts recently in 2000, to address several human rights violations during the Internal conflict in Peru during the 1980s, these consist one of the largest process of systematic violence all over Peru …   Wikipedia

  • American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man — All men are born free and equal, in dignity and in rights, and, being endowed by nature with reason and conscience, they should conduct themselves as brothers one to another. – Preamble, American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of ManInfobox …   Wikipedia


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.