Epistemic minimalism

Epistemic minimalism

Epistemic minimalism is the epistemological thesis that mere true belief is sufficient for knowledge. That is, the "meaning" of "Smith knows that it rained today" is accurately and completely analyzed by these two conditions:

# Smith believes that it rained today.
# It is true that it rained today.

The thesis is called "minimalist" by way of contrast with the competing accounts, which more or less universally require that true belief is necessary but insufficient for knowledge—that is, that a belief needs to be true in order to count as knowledge, but that truth alone is not enough—that "something else" is needed. Traditionally, that something else was held to be evidential justification; today it is usually held to be either justification "and also" some other condition, or else some other condition "instead of" justification, which will avoid the Gettier problem.

Whatever the analysis, though, the standard view (both pre-Gettier and post-Gettier) pushes for "narrower" analyses of knowledge than mere true belief. Epistemic minimalism turns in exactly the opposite direction, and argues for a much more "inclusive" analysis--one which includes even Gettier cases, lucky guesses, and completely unjustified beliefs, as long as they happen to be true. The thesis is a "minimalism" in the sense that it eschews the additional requirements piled on top of true belief and argues that the intuitive reasons given for the JTB analysis and its descendants are either misleading or misunderstood.

The most famous (or infamous) proponent of epistemic minimalism is Crispin Sartwell (1991). The view has been criticized by many epistemologists, with an influential criticism being delivered by William Lycan (1994).

References

*Sartwell, C. (1991): Knowledge is Merely True Belief in American Philosophical Quarterly 28.
*Sartwell, C. (1992): [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-362X%28199204%2989%A4%3C167%3AWKIMTB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I Why Knowledge is Merely True Belief] in The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 89, No. 4 (Apr., 1992), 167-180.
*Lycan, W. (1994): Sartwell's Minimalist Analysis of Knowing in Philosophical Studies 73.


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • List of philosophy topics (D-H) — DDaDai Zhen Pierre d Ailly Jean Le Rond d Alembert John Damascene Damascius John of Damascus Peter Damian Danish philosophy Dante Alighieri Arthur Danto Arthur C. Danto Arthur Coleman Danto dao Daodejing Daoism Daoist philosophy Charles Darwin… …   Wikipedia

  • List of topics in epistemology — * A Defence of Common Sense * A priori and a posteriori (philosophy) * Adaptive representation * Aenesidemus * Aenesidemus (book) * Agrippa the Sceptic * Alison Wylie * Alvin Goldman * Analytic synthetic distinction * Androcentrism * Android… …   Wikipedia

  • William Lycan — Infobox Philosopher region = Western Philosophy era = 20th century philosophy color = #B0C4DE image caption = name = William G. Lycan birth = September 26, 1945 death = | school tradition = analytic philosophy main interests = philosophy of… …   Wikipedia

  • Postmodern art — is a term used to describe art which is thought to be in contradiction to some aspect of modernism, or to have emerged or developed in its aftermath. In general movements such as Intermedia, Installation art, Conceptual Art and Multimedia,… …   Wikipedia

  • Contextualism — describes a collection of views in philosophy which emphasize the context in which an action, utterance, or expression occurs, and argues that, in some important respect, the action, utterance, or expression can only be understood relative to… …   Wikipedia

  • Deflationary theory of truth — A deflationary theory of truth is one of a family of theories which all have in common the claim that assertions that predicate truth of a statement do not attribute a property called truth to such a statement. Contents 1 Redundancy theory 2… …   Wikipedia

  • Non-monotonic logic — A non monotonic logic is a formal logic whose consequence relation is not monotonic. Most studied formal logics have a monotonic consequence relation, meaning that adding a formula to a theory never produces a reduction of its set of consequences …   Wikipedia

  • literature — /lit euhr euh cheuhr, choor , li treuh /, n. 1. writings in which expression and form, in connection with ideas of permanent and universal interest, are characteristic or essential features, as poetry, novels, history, biography, and essays. 2.… …   Universalium

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”