Nick Bostrom

Nick Bostrom
Nick Bostrom at the 2006 Singularity Summit.

Nick Bostrom (born Niklas Boström on 10 March 1973[1]) is a Swedish philosopher at the University of Oxford known for his work on existential risk and the anthropic principle. He holds a PhD from the London School of Economics (2000). He is currently the director of The Future of Humanity Institute and a fellow of St Cross College at Oxford University.

In addition to his writing for academic and popular press, Bostrom makes frequent media appearances in which he talks about transhumanism-related topics such as cloning, artificial intelligence, superintelligence, mind uploading, cryonics, nanotechnology, and the simulation argument.

Contents

Philosophy

Ethics of human enhancement

Bostrom is favourable towards "human enhancement", or "self-improvement and human perfectibility through the ethical application of science",[2][3] as well as a critic of bio-conservative views.[4]

In 1998, Bostrom co-founded (with David Pearce) the World Transhumanist Association[2] (which has since changed its name to Humanity+). In 2004, he co-founded (with James Hughes) the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. In 2005 he was appointed Director of the newly created Future of Humanity Institute in Oxford. Bostrom is the 2009 recipient of the Eugene R. Gannon Award for the Continued Pursuit of Human Advancement [5][6] and was named in Foreign Policy's 2009 list of top global thinkers "for accepting no limits on human potential." [7]

Existential risk

Bostrom has addressed the philosophical question of humanity's long-term survival.[8] He defines an existential risk as one in which an "adverse outcome would either annihilate Earth-originating intelligent life or permanently and drastically curtail its potential." In the 2008 volume "Global Catastrophic Risks", editors Bostrom and Cirkovic offer a detailed taxonomy of existential risk.

Anthropic principle

Bostrom has argued that the correct understanding of the anthropic principle is by means of his Strong Self-Sampling Assumption: Each observer-moment should reason as if it were randomly selected from the class of all observer-moments in its reference class. In this conception, each observer moment should be analysed as if it were randomly sampled. Analysing an observer's experience into a sequence of "observer-moments" helps avoid certain paradoxes. However the main ambiguity is the selection of the appropriate "reference class". For the Weak Anthropic Principle this might correspond to all real or potential observer-moments in our universe. For the Strong version, it might correspond to all observer-moments in the multiverse. Bostrom's mathematical development shows that choosing either too broad or too narrow a reference class leads to counter-intuitive results; but he is not able to prescribe a perfect choice.

Simulation hypothesis

On the surface, Bostrom's simulation hypothesis is an example of a skeptical hypothesis, a proposal concerning the nature of reality put forward to question beliefs, and as such, there is a long history to the underlying thesis that reality is an illusion. This thesis can be dated back to Plato, arguably underpins the Mind-Body Dualism of Descartes, and is closely related to phenomenalism, a stance briefly adopted by Bertrand Russell. However, Bostrom has argued that this is not the case, and that there are empirical reasons why the 'Simulation Hypothesis' might be valid. He suggests that if it is possible to simulate entire inhabited planets or even entire universes on a computer, and that such simulated people can be fully conscious, then the sheer number of such simulations likely to be produced by any sufficiently advanced civilization (taken together with his Strong Self-Sampling Assumption) makes it extremely likely that we are in fact currently living in such a simulation.

Bostrom contends that at least one of the following statements is overwhelmingly likely to be true:

  1. No civilization will reach a level of technological maturity capable of producing simulated realities.
  2. No civilization reaching aforementioned technological status will produce a significant number of simulated realities, for any of a number of reasons, such as diversion of computational processing power for other tasks, ethical considerations of holding entities captive in simulated realities, etc.
  3. Any entities with our general set of experiences are almost certainly living in a simulation.

The following is the equation which is used to quantify those three statements:[9]

f_\textrm{sim} = \frac{f_\textrm{p}NH} {(f_\textrm{p}NH)+H}

where:

fp is the fraction of all human civilizations that will reach a technological capability to program reality simulators.
N is the average number of ancestor-simulations run by the civilizations mentioned by fp.
H is the average number of individuals who have lived in a civilization before it was able to perform reality simulation.
fsim is the fraction of all humans who live in virtual realities.

Because H will be such a large value, at least one of the three proximations will be true:

fp ≈ 0
N ≈ 0
fsim ≈ 1

Books

See also

References

  1. ^ nickbostrom.com
  2. ^ a b "The ideas interview: Nick Bostrom; John Sutherland meets a transhumanist who wrestles with the ethics of technologically enhanced human beings" John Sutherland, The Guardian, 9 May 2006.
  3. ^ Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2003): pp. 493-506
  4. ^ Nick Bostrom (2005) "In Defence of Posthuman Dignity" Bioethics, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 202-214
  5. ^ http://gannonaward.org/The_Gannon_Award/The_Gannon_Group.html
  6. ^ http://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/archive/2009/eugene_r._gannon_award_for_the_continued_pursuit_of_human_advancement
  7. ^ http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/11/30/the_fp_top_100_global_thinkers?page=0,30
  8. ^ Nick Bostrom (March 2002), "Existential Risks", Journal of Evolution and Technology
  9. ^ BOSTROM, NICK. Are You Living in a Computer Simulation? Web. 19 Jan. 2010. <http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html>.

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Nick Bostrom — im Jahr 2006 in der Stanford University. Nick Bostrom (* 10. März 1973 als Niklas Boström) ist Philosoph an der Oxford University. Neben seiner akademischen Arbeit äußert er sich im englischsprachigen Raum auch regelmäßig in den Medien über… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Nick Bostrom — lors d un sommet en 2006 à l Université Stanford Nick Bostrom (né en 1973) est un philosophe suédois connu pour son approche du principe anthropique. En 1998 il fonde avec David Pearce la World Transhumanist Association (devenue depuis Humanity+) …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Nick Bostrom — en la Universidad de Stanford, 2006. Nick Bostrom (nacido en 1973 con el nombre de Niklas Boström) es un filósofo de la Universidad de Oxford conocido por su trabajo del principio antrópico. Consiguió el PhD de la LSE (2000). Además de sus… …   Wikipedia Español

  • Bostrom — ist der Familienname folgender Personen: Ben Bostrom (* 1974), US amerikanischer Motorradrennfahrer Eric Bostrom (* 1976), US amerikanischer Motorradrennfahrer Nick Bostrom (* 1973 als Niklas Boström), schwedischer Philosoph und Hochschullehrer… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Simulated reality — is the proposition that reality could be simulated perhaps by computer simulation to a degree indistinguishable from true reality. It could contain conscious minds which may or may not be fully aware that they are living inside a simulation. This …   Wikipedia

  • Transhumanismo — La evolución según el transhumanismo. El Transhumanismo es tanto un concepto filosófico como un movimiento intelectual internacional que apoya el empleo de …   Wikipedia Español

  • Risks to civilization, humans and planet Earth — This article is about the near and very far future. For past civilizations, see Societal collapse. Contents 1 Types of risks 2 Future scenarios 2.1 …   Wikipedia

  • Anthropic principle — In astrophysics and cosmology, the anthropic principle is the philosophical argument that observations of the physical Universe must be compatible with the conscious life that observes it. Some proponents of the argument reason that it explains… …   Wikipedia

  • Transhumanism — This article is about the futurist ideology and movement. For the critique of humanism, see posthumanism …   Wikipedia

  • Simulism — [The term in the usage in which it appears here seems to have been coined by [http://www.jansch.nl/tag/simulism/ Ivo Jansch] in September 2006. His [http://www.simulism.org Simulism Wiki] is an exploration of Simulism, which invites contributions …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”