Southern Athabascan grammar

Southern Athabascan (also Apachean, Southern Athabaskan) is a subfamily of Athabaskan languages spoken in the North American Southwest. Refer to Southern Athabascan languages for the main article.

Typological overview

Typologically, Southern Athabaskan languages are mostly fusional, polysynthetic, nominative-accusative head-marking languages. These languages are argued to be non-configurational languages. The canonical word order is SOV, as can be seen in Lipan example below:

: Kónitsąąhį́į́ dziłádałts’aa’híí áí daajiłdiił "The Lipan ate those wild grapes."

: Subject = Kónitsąąhį́į́ "the Lipan": Object = dziłádałts’aa’híí áí "those wild grapes" ("dziłádałts’aa’híí" "wild grapes", "áí" "those"): Verb = daajiłdiił "they ate them"

Southern Athabaskan words are modified primarily by prefixes, which is uncommon for SOV languages (suffixes are expected).

The Southern Athabaskan languages are "verb-heavy" — they have a great ponderance of verbs but relatively few nouns. In addition to verbs and nouns, these languages have other elements such as pronouns, clitics of various functions, demonstratives, numerals, adverbs, and conjunctions, among others. Harry Hoijer grouped most of the above into a word class which he called "particle" based on the type of inflection that occurs on the word class. This categorization provides three main lexical categories (i.e. parts of speech):

# verbs
# nouns/postpositions
# particles

There is nothing that corresponds to what are called "adjectives" in English. Adjectival notions are provided by verbs; however, these adjectival verb stems do form a distinct sub-class of verb stems which co-occur with adjectival prefixes.

Nouns

SA nouns are essentially of the following types (with various subtypes):

# simple nouns
# compound nouns
# nouns derived from verbs/verb phrases (deverbal noun)

The simple nouns can consist of only a noun stem (which are usually only a single syllable long), such as

* Chiricahua: ku̧u̧ "fire", and
* Navajo: sǫ’ "star".

Other nouns may consist of a noun plus one or more prefixes, such as

* Navajo: dibé "sheep" (< "di-" + "-bé"; stem: "-bé")

or of a noun plus an enclitic or suffix, such as

* Chiricahua: dlú̧í "prairie dog" (< "dlú̧-" + "-í"; stem: "dlú̧-").

The added prefixes may be lexical or they may be inflectional prefixes (e.g. personal prefixes indicating possession). SA languages do not have many simple nouns, but these nouns are the most ancient part of the lexicon and thus are essential in making comparisons between Athabascan languages.

Another noun type is a noun compound consisting of more than one noun stem, such as

* Chiricahua: ku̧u̧ba̧a̧ "fireside" (< "ku̧u̧" "fire" + "ba̧a̧" "edge"), and
* Navajo: tsésǫ’ "glass" (< "tsé" "rock" + "sǫ" "star").

Other kinds of noun compounds are the following:

* noun stem + postposition
* noun stem + verb stem
* noun stem + postposition + noun stem

Many other various combinations of elements are possible.

The most common type of noun is the deverbal noun (i.e., a noun derived from a verb). Most of these nouns are formed by adding a nominalizing enclitic, such as Mescalero -ń or -í, Western Apache -í and Navajo -í, to the end of the verb phrase. For example, in Mescalero the verb ’ént’į́į́ "he/she betwitches him/her" may become a noun by adding either the enclitic -ń (for people) or -í (for things):

* ’ént’į́į́ "he or she betwitches him or her"
* ’ént’į́į́ń "witch"
* ’ént’į́į́’í "witchcraft"

Thus, the word ’ént’į́į́ń "witch" literally means "the one who betwitches him or her". Another example is from Navajo:

* ná’oolkiłí "clock" ("lit." "one that is moved slowly in a circle")

Many of these nouns may be quite complex, as in Navajo

* chidí naa’na’í bee’eldǫǫhtsoh bikáá’ dah naaznilígíí "army tank" ("lit." "a car that they sit up on top of that crawls around with a big thing with which an explosion is made")

Other deverbal nouns do not appear with a nominalizing enclitic, as in Navajo

* Hoozdo "Phoenix, Arizona" ("lit." "the place is hot")
* ch’é’étiin "doorway" ("lit." "something has a path horizontally out")

For a comparison with nouns in a Northern Athabascan language, see

Noun inflection

Possession

Prefixes

Most nouns can be inflected to show possession. Simple nouns, compound nouns, and some deverbal nouns are inflected by adding a pronominal prefix to the noun base, as in the following Chiricahua possessed noun paradigm (i.e. noun declension):

:

A Navajo pronominal prefix paradigm may be compared with the Chiricahua above:

:

By observing these Navajo possessive phrases, it is evident here that Southern Athabascan languages are head-marking in that the possessive prefix is added to the possessed noun, which is the "head" of the noun phrase (this is unlike the dependent-marking languages of Europe where possessive affixes are added to the possessor).

tem modification

* absolute vs. possessed vs. compound (combining) forms
* voicing
* vocalic suffixes

Alienable vs. inalienable

* Possession (linguistics)#Alienable and inalienable
* Possession (linguistics)#Inherent and non-inherent (constantly possessed)
* associated semantic changes

Postpositions

Clitics

* proclitics
* enclitics
* postpositional enclitics

Particles

Verbs

The key element in Southern Athabaskan languages is the verb, and it is notoriously complex. Verbs are composed of a "stem" to which inflectional and/or derivational prefixes are added. Every verb must have at least one prefix. The prefixes are affixed to the verb in a specified order.

The Southern Athabaskan verb can be sectioned into different morphological components. The verb "stem" is composed of an abstract "root" and an often fused suffix. The stem together with a "classifier" prefix (and sometimes other "thematic" prefixes) make up the verb "theme". The theme is then combined with derivational prefixes which in turn make up the verb "base". Finally, inflectional prefixes (which Young & Morgan call "paradigmatic prefixes") are affixed to the base&mdash;producing a complete verb. This is represented schematically in the table below:

Although prefixes are generally found in a specific position, some prefixes change order by the process of metathesis. For example, in "Navajo" prefix ’a- (3i object pronoun) usually occurs before di-, as in

: adisbąąs 'I'm starting to drive some kind of wheeled vehicle along' [ < " ’a-" + "di-" + "sh-" + "ł" + "-bąąs"] .

However, when ’a- occurs with the prefixes di- and ni-, the ’a- metathesizes with di-, leading to an order of di- + ’a- + ni-, as in

: di’nisbąąs 'I'm in the act of driving some vehicle (into something) & getting stuck' [ < "di-’a-ni-sh-ł-bąąs" < "’a-" + "di-" + "ni-" + "sh-" + "ł" + "-bąąs"]

instead of the expected adinisbąąs ("’a-di-ni-sh-ł-bąąs") (note also that ’a- is reduced to ’-). Metathesis is conditioned by phonological environment (Young & Morgan 1987:39).

Verb stems and mode & aspect

Verb stems have different forms that alternate according to aspect and tense. The alternation (ablaut) mostly involves vowels (change in vowel, vowel length, or nasality) and tone, but sometimes includes the suffixation of a final consonant. The Chiricahua verb stems below have five different forms that correspond to "mode":

Although there are 26 combinations for this verb, there is a high degree of homophony, in that there are only 7 different stem forms (-’aah, -’ááh, -’aał, -’ááł, -’a’, -á, -’ą́). To complicate matters, different verbs have different patterns of homophony: some verbs have only 1 stem form that occurs in all mode-aspect combinations, others have 5 forms, etc., and not all stems occur in the same mode-aspect combinations. Additionally, the different stem forms of different verbs are formed in different ways.

Classifiers

* d-effect

ubject and object prefixes

Classificatory Verbs

Southern Athabaskan languages have verb stems that classify a particular object by its shape or other physical characteristics in addition to describing the movement or state of the object. These are known in Athabaskan linguistics as "classificatory verb stems". These are usually identified by an acronym label. There are 11 primary classificatory "handling" verbs stems in "Navajo" which are listed below (given in the perfective mode). Other Southern Athabaskan languages have a slightly different set of stems.

To compare with English, "Navajo" has no single verb that corresponds to the English word "give". In order to say the equivalent of "Give me some hay!" the Navajo verb "níłjool" (NCM) must be used, while for "Give me a cigarette!" the verb "nítįįh" (SSO) must be used. The English verb "give" is expressed by 11 different verbs in Navajo, depending on the characteristics of the given object.

In addition to defining the physical properties of the object, primary classificatory verb stems also can distinguish between the manner of movement of the object. The stems can then be grouped into three different categories:

:# handling:# propelling:# free flight

"Handling" includes actions such as carrying, lowering, and taking. "Propelling" includes tossing, dropping, and throwing. "Free flight" includes falling, and flying through space.

Using an example for the SRO category Navajo has

:# "-'ą́" "to handle (a round object)",:# "-ne"' "to throw (a round object)", and:# "-l-ts'id" "(a round object) moves independently".

In addition, Southern Athabaskan languages also have other somewhat similar verb stems that Young & Morgan (1987) call "secondary classificatory verbs".

(Note the term "classifier" is used in Athabaskan linguistics to refer to a prefix that indicates transitivity or acts as a thematic prefix, and as such is somewhat of a misnomer. These transitivity "classifiers" are not involved in the classificatory verb stems' classification of nouns and are not related in any way to the noun "classifiers" found in Chinese or Thai).

"yi-"/"bi-" Alternation (Animacy)

Like most Athabaskan languages, Southern Athabaskan languages show various levels of animacy in its grammar, with certain nouns taking specific verb forms according to their rank in this animacy hierarchy. For instance, "Navajo" nouns can be ranked by animacy on a continuum from most animate (a human or lightning) to least animate (an abstraction) (Young & Morgan 1987: 65-66):

"humans/lightning → infants/big animals → med-size animals → small animals → insects → natural forces → inanimate objects/plants → abstractions"

Generally, the most animate noun in a sentence must occur first while the noun with lesser animacy occurs second. If both nouns are equal in animacy, then either noun can occur in the first position. So, both example sentences (1) and (2) are correct. The "yi-" prefix on the verb indicates that the 1st noun is the subject and "bi-" indicates that the 2nd noun is the subject.

(1)	Ashkii	at'ééd	yiníł'į́.
	boy	girl	"yi"-look
	'The boy is looking at the girl.'

(2)	At'ééd	ashkii	biníł'į́.
	girl	boy	"bi"-look
	'The girl is being looked at by the boy.'

But example sentence (3) sounds wrong to most Navajo speakers because the less animate noun occurs before the more animate noun:

(3)	* Tsídii	at'ééd	yishtąsh.
	bird	girl	"yi"-pecked
	'The bird pecked the girl.'

In order express this idea, the more animate noun must occur first, as in sentence (4):

(4)	At'ééd	tsídii	bishtąsh.
	girl	bird	"bi"-pecked
	'The girl was pecked by the bird.'

Note that although sentence (4) is translated into English with a passive verb, in Navajo it is not passive. Passive verbs are formed by certain "classifier" prefixes (i.e. transitivity prefixes) that occur directly before the verb stem in position 9.

References

:"Refer to Southern Athabaskan languages/Bibliography for references"