- Royaldutchshellplc.com
royaldutchshellplc.com is a
gripe site operated by 91 year old Alfred Donovan and his 61 year old son John Donovan, which is critical ofRoyal Dutch Shell . On11 June 2007 , Ed Crooks of theFinancial Times described it as [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/06/11/financial-times-energy-filter-stirring-words-on-sakhalin/ "an anti-Shell website run by a father and son partnership that has been a long-running thorn in the company’s side."] On 25 January 2008, Carl Mortished, World Business Editor ofThe Times newspaper wrote an article headlined: “"Shell chief fears oil shortage in seven years”" in which he described the site as [http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/wef/article3248484.ece "“an independent website that monitors the company.”"] During the course of a longfeud between the Donovan's and Shell, oil industry observers have speculated that the Donovan's thwarted a ShellTexaco merger and cost Shell billions ofpounds sterling in respect of itsSakhalin-2 project inRussia .Background to legal battles with Shell
The Donovan’s owned a chain of petrol stations in East London and
Essex and created many [http://www.shellnews.net/Media/sales-promotion-magazine-don-marketing-%20advert-%20june-1991.html sales promotion campaigns] . In 1981, the Donovans devised a promotional game scheme forRoyal Dutch Shell called [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/IncentiveMarSalesProMarch1984.pdf “Make Money”] . Because the promotion was successful, many other [http://www.shellnews.net/2007/shell-don-marketing-game-pieces.html Shell promotional campaigns followed,] including a £4.5 millionMastermind TV Series themed [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/DailyMirrorMake27Aug84.pdf game] ; a scratch card game, [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/ShellMakeMerryNov1984.pdf "Shell Make Merry"] , offering £2.5 million inHarrods food prizes; a playing card themed promotion, [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/ShellUKStarTrekGameSummer1985.pdf "Bruce's Lucky Deal"] , endorsed by UK TV celebrityBruce Forsyth and in 1991, a £4.5 million “Every Card Can Win” scratch card [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/PromotionIncentiveStarTrekJuly91.pdf game] with aStar Trek theme.In an article published by Marketing Magazine in September 1986, under the headline [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/MarketingMagCol18Sept1986.pdf "Games people play] ", Shell was identified as "perhaps the biggest user of games". The article went on to say in reference to Shell, "All its recent games have involved Don Marketing". John Donovan was shown in a photograph holding aloft posters for the Shell
Singapore Make Money game.The business relationship which operated on an [http://www.shellnews.net/Media/marketing-magazine-john-donovan-shell-make-money-game.html international basis] , floundered after Shell appointed a new National Promotions manager in 1992 to whom the Donovan’s promotional ideas were disclosed on a confidential basis. In 1994, the Donovan’s issued a
Writ against Shell in respect of a follow-up “Make Money” promotion claimingbreach of confidence andbreach of contract . The Donovan’s accepted a £60,000 settlement but continued to pursue legal claims over a ShellNintendo scratch off game and a film themed collector game called “Now Showing”. The further Writ was [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/MarketingMag20Oct1994.pdf issued in October 1994] . Shell settled both claims in October 1996. During the course of the litigation, the Donovan’s founded the “Shell Corporate Conscience Pressure Group” and what may have been the worlds first "gripe" websites. Shell referred to the Donovan's internet activity in a [http://shellnews.net/2006affidavit/shell-press-release-dated-17-march-1995.htm] press statement issued on17 March 1995 . An article published on 11 June 1998 byThe Daily Telegraph under the headline of [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/03/11/daily-telegraph-donovans-beef-with-shell-on-line-thursday-june-11-1998-2/ "Donovan's beef with Shell on-line"] reported that "Donovan is publicising his gripes on two elaborate and colourful internet websites, [http://www.don-marketing.com/ don-marketing.com] and [http://www.shellshareholders.org/ shell-shareholders.org"] . "On 23 April 1998, Marketing Week magazine published an article under the headline: [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/MarketingWeek4pages23April98.pdf "High Court papers unveil 'secret' Shell writ losses."] Coverage spread over a number of pages detailed three previous claims settled by Shell. In June 1999, a High Court trial commenced in respect of the new claim by John Donovan against Shell, this time relating to a loyalty programme utilising smart card technology for a multi-retailer scheme by Shell. The legal costs were estimated to be over a million pounds. Donovan also threatened to [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/MarketingWeekNotice28May1998.pdf sue any business which joined the SMART scheme] and [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/MarketingWeek21May1998.pdf also threatened related legal action against Shell’s UK petrol stations] . According to a report in
The Sunday Telegraph Shell Legal Director, Richard Wiseman, denied allegations made by Donovan against Shell and said that he was “misguided” and had been wrongly encouraged by Shell’s previous payments. Donovan alleged that Shell had used anundercover agent , Christopher Phillips, in the run up to the trial. According to The Sunday Telegraph report Shell’s lawyers admitted that they hired Mr Phillips, but only to carry out “routine credit inquiries”. [ [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/06/06/ncard06.html Sunday Telegraph report] (6 June 1999).]An article published in the July-August 1999 edition of "Incentive Today" under the headline [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/IncentiveTodayplusShellJulyAug99.pdf "Don and Shell end Smart row"] reported that both parties had issued a joint statement announcing that John Donovan had abandoned his claim against Shell. The article went on to discuss industry speculation that the Donovan litigation had been a barrier to a merger between Shell and
Texaco . Shell had already signed a 'Memorandum of Understanding ' with Texaco but the merger never took place and in October 2000, Texaco instead agreed to a [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/TexacoChevronMergerOct2000.pdf "$100 BILLION MERGER"] withChevron Corporation , one of Shell's rivals.According to an article published in February 2007 by Prospect magazine referring to the same "Smart" settlement, "Shell agreed to settle out of court, paying the Donovans a sum "in the thousands" as part of a "peace treaty" stipulating that neither party speak about the matter in future". The article quotes Donovan as alleging that Shell subsequently broke the "peace treaty". [http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=8209 Rise of the gripe site]
Prospect magazine , February 2007]Alfred Donovan and John Donovan are both retired from commercial activities. Their former company, Don Marketing, ceased trading several years ago. Their websites are all non-commercial; do not seek or accept donations, offer all services without charge, and carry no advertising.
Appeals to Shell shareholders, Shell employees, and the public
Royaldutchshellplc.com was described in an [http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=8209 article] published in February 2007 by
Prospect magazine in the following terms: "The Donovan website has become an open wound for Shell"." It has been used to publish appeals on behalf of a number of parties who wanted to reach Shell shareholders and/or Shell employees, or the public e.g.
* An appeal for support byFriends of the Earth in the Netherlands was posted on the royaldutchshell.com website from 20 December 2006 for a campaign entitled shelladvert.org. [ [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2006/12/20/appeal-by-friends-of-the-earth-netherlands-to-support-shelladvertorg-campaign/ appeal for support] ]Royaldutchshellplc.com is also used to publish information by The National Union of Ogoni Students (NUOS) "an independent, non-profit entity that functions as the students unit of the
Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP)." A letter from NUOS to PresidentOlusegun Obasanjo of the Federal Republic ofNigeria was published on 17 December 2006. It demanded that the license granted Shell Oil to operate inOgoni should be revoked. The following is an extract from the letter "the worlds' most impoverished people inhabiting one of the world's wealthiest span of land. This irony ridiculously fed by succeeding governments of Nigeria and Shell Oil Company is unacceptable." [ [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2006/12/17/lettter-from-national-union-of-ogoni-students-to-president-olusegun-obasanjo-of-nigeria/ Letter from National Union of Ogoni students to President Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria] ] Shell has unsuccessfully attempted to promote a reconciliation process with the Ogoni which would allow Shell to recommence oil production in Ogoniland. [ [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2006/10/22/daily-independent-nigeria-ogoni-shell-dialogue-dead-says-mosop/ Shell dialogue dead says mosop] ]Connection with Shell Sakhalin-II project
Moves by the Russian government in relation to environmental issues concerning the Royal Dutch Shell led
Sakhalin-II project in easternRussia created an international furore, with representations made to PresidentVladimir Putin by Prime MinisterTony Blair and many other heads of government. On 18 October 2006, the Donovan's published an article confirming they had for some time been supplying information to the Russian government relating to Sakhalin II. Information in the form of Shell internal emails and Shell insider comments, posted on Royaldutchshellplc.com, were passed by the Donovan's toOleg Mitvol , the Deputy Head of Rosprirodnadzor, the Russian Environmental Agency. In November 2006, Oleg Mitvol confirmed in an interview [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2006/11/19/argus-eyescom-mitvol-turns-up-the-heat-i-received-these-letters-from-john-donovan-owner-of-the-anti-shell-website-wwwroyaldutchshellplccom/ published] in This Week in Argus FSU Energy that the evidence on which a prosecution against Sakhalin Energy claiming $10 billion in damages was being mounted, was supplied by John Donovan of royaldutchshellplc.com. Mr Mitvol was quoted as saying: "Who will take Sakhalin Energy to court? I will take them. I have documents proving that the Sakhalin Energy management was aware that the company violated technical standards, but carried on trying to meet project deadlines and refused to stop work. I am confident of winning my case in Stockholm. What documents are these? Where are they from? I have email correspondence between executives in Sakhalin Energy management from 2002. I received these letters from John Donovan, owner of the anti-Shell website www.royaldutchshellplc.com." The Russian energy company [http://www.gazprom.com/ Gazprom] controlled by the Russian government subsequently obtained a [http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2060411,00.html majority holding] in the Sakhalin-II project. A further report of the supply of evidence by John Donovan to Mitvol was [http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/2006-256-22.cfm published] on 13 November 2006 byJohnson's Russia List sourced fromInterfax . According to an [http://www.shellnews.net/images/upstreamonline_shellreserves_20march08.html article] published by Upstreamonline.com on 20 March 2008, under the headline "Shell reserves on a steady course"," Shell lost 402 boe - barrels of oil equivalent - as a consequence of "the sale of half its stake in the $20 billion Sakhalin 2 project". " An [http://www.shellnews.net/PDFs/SakhalinBostonGlobearticleAug08.pdf article] published byThe Boston Globe on 23 August 2008 said "Shell Oil was forced to yield control of its operations off Sakhalin Island in exchange for a payment of $7.4 billion from state-dominated Gazprom." It went on to say "Most outside analysts estimate that Shell's share was worth $15 billion to $17 billion." The article was written by Marshall I. Goldman, seniorscholar at the Davis Center for Russian Studies atHarvard , the author of "Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia."Recommended by Fortune magazine for information about Royal Dutch Shell plc
On
2 August 2006 , [http://money.cnn.com/ CNNMoney.com] published a [http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/07/24/8381730/index.htm feature] fromFortune magazine recommending books and websites focused on the world's top five companies, as ranked in the "Fortune Global 500". A company website with a corresponding website critical of the company’s activities was featured for each multinational. ForRoyal Dutch Shell , listed as number 3 in the rankings, Shell's portal website [http://www.shell.com/home/Framework?siteId=home shell.com] was cited along with royaldutchshellplc.comFinancial Times says website has long been a thorn in Shell’s side
On
6 June 2007 , the Financial Times published a front page article under the headline: [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/06/05/financial-times-%e2%80%98pipeliners-all%e2%80%99-shell%e2%80%99s-memo-to-sakhalin/ "Pipeliners All!’ Shell’s memo to Sakhalin]The article was about a leaked motivational memo in the form of an email from David Greer, the Deputy Chief Executive of Sakhalin Energy, the company in which Shell is a shareholder and former owner. The email was circulated to Sakhalin-2 staff. The article stated that "The memo was leaked to the website www.royaldutchshellplc.com, which has long been a thorn in Shell’s side. Shell confirmed the e-mail was genuine but was reluctant to discuss it further". The article quoted extensively from the memo. The entire content of the leaked memo was [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/06/05/financial-times-%e2%80%98pipeliners-all%e2%80%99-shell%e2%80%99s-memo-to-sakhalin-the-e-mail-in-full/ published] by the FT on the same date. The FT also conducted a separate online poll asking the question: [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/06/07/financial-times-ft-poll-on-greer-memo-updated-07-june-2007/ "Is this the worst motivational memo ever?"]
One passage in the motivational memo was so striking that
Time Magazine published it in their “Quotes of the Day” feature on 6 June 2007: [http://205.188.238.109/time/quotes/0,26174,1629779,00.html “… So Lead me, Follow me or Get out of my way; Success is how we bounce when we are on the bottom”.]A keen eyed FT reader noticed that inspirational passages were appropriated from a famous speech given by the legendary U.S. General
George S Patton , on 5 June 1944 on the eve ofD-Day the Sixth of June. On 7 June 2007, a quarter page follow-up article was published in the Financial Times newspaper and on the FT.com website, under the headline: [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/06/06/financial-times-shell-mans-motivation-memo-is-straight-from-the-patton-script-talent-borrows-genius-steals/ "Sakhalin motivational memo borrows heavily from Patton”."]On
9 June 2007 ,The Moscow Times published a front page article under the heading: [http://www.tellshell.net/blog/_archives/2007/6/9/3008757.html Sakhalin Pep Talk From 'Old Blood and Guts'] The article said: "“Greer's memo, which was leaked to an anti-Shell web site, Royaldutchshellplc.com, appears to show the pressure that he and his fellow managers have been under, as it talks of "the risk of becoming a team that doesn't want to fight and lacks confidence in its own ability." The Moscow Times article contained forthright comments by the Russian environmental watchdog,Oleg Mitvol , about the email.On Monday
11 June 2007 , theFinancial Times published a [http://www.tellshell.net/blog/_archives/2007/6/11/3013806.html further article] on the subject this time headlined: "“Motivational memos must make their message clear”." One of the opening paragraphs stated: "“The memo (www.ft.com/shell) is crass, poorly punctuated and most of it wasn't even written by its author, David Greer, deputy chief executive of Royal Dutch Shell's Sakhalin Energy Investment Company. He had lifted the words of General George S. Patton with no attribution, and clumsily adapted them to spur on his team of recalcitrant pipeline engineers”".On Friday
22 June 2007 ,The Moscow Times published a [http://www.tellshell.net/blog/_archives/2007/6/21/3038557.html front page story] with the headline: "Sakhalin Energy's Greer Steps Down"." The article revealed that "A motivational e-mail written by Greer to staff working on the project, originally leaked to an anti-Shell web site, Royaldutchshellplc.com, was the subject of a front-page story in the Financial Times earlier this month." It went on to say "David Greer, the Sakhalin Energy deputy CEO running the giant Sakhalin-2 oil and gas project, has left the company unexpectedly just weeks after a leaked e-mail he wrote revealed the pressure that managers working there were facing"." The article said that Greer had been a 27-year Shell veteran and was leaving to pursue other business interests.A gripe site can have a profound impact on global organisations
An "Accountability in Action" [http://www.oneworldtrust.org/?display=accnewsjul07 newsletter] published in July 2007 by the
One World Trust , an independent research organisation associated with the UKlegislature and theUnited Nations , said: "As The Royal Dutch Shell plc website shows, a gripe site can have a profound impact on global organisations"." The newsletter went on to say: "The site has not only cost Shell billions of dollars in Russia... "even Shell insiders unhappy with the company use it"." The article also said: "Royaldutchshellplc.com is just one of many examples of how the Internet makes it possible for concerned individuals to initiate discussion about global organisations, post and share information about organisational actions and their impact, and provide a common forum for affected stakeholders. At the very least, ‘gripe sites’ such as this have a valuable watchdog function and remind global companies of the power of public opinion – thus forcing them to confront weaknesses in their own accountability"." Email [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/08/01/todays-email-correspondence-with-senior-shell-lawyers-wednesday-1-august-2007/ correspondence in August 2007] between Royal Dutch Shell Plc and the owners of the website provide evidence of the unusual involvement by the website in the day-to-day functioning of the company.hell “rattled” and put on the “back foot” by joint Campbell/Donovan safety campaign
On
1 September 2007 , TheDaily Mail newspaper published an article about a Shell employee safety campaign conducted jointly by royaldutchshellplc.com and the former GroupAuditor of Shell International, Mr Bill Campbell. The article headlined [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/09/01/daily-mail-shell-on-back-foot-as-gripe-site-alleges-safety-concerns/ "Shell on backfoot as 'gripe site' alleges safety concerns"] said: “"ROYAL Dutch Shell is getting rattled by a ‘gripe site ’ that alleges there are safety problems with itsNorth Sea oil platforms." The article revealed "“An internal Shellemail admits the firm has been thrown ‘on the back foot’ because of claims put forward on the Royaldutchshellplc.com website.”" It went on to say "“Campbell has emailed hundreds ofMPs alleging Shell hasn’t yet properly tackledhealth and safety failings.”" The article featured a number of quotes from Shell internal emails revealing a state of uncertainty at Shell about how to deal with the allegations. One stated: "“As it stands we’re on the back foot and our aim should be to develop a strategy (or options) that puts us in a more positive and secure position.”"Reuters describes royaldutchshellplc.com as "unofficial company Web site."
On
4 September 2007 , Reuters published an article by Tom Bergin headlined: [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/09/04/reuters-shell-loses-exec-on-troubled-kazakh-project-source/ "Shell loses exec on troubled Kazakh project-source".] " The article said that a Royal Dutch Shell Plc executive "working onKashagan , a project under pressure from theKazakh government for being over budget and behindschedule , has quit, company sources told an unofficial company Web site." The article went on to say that "John Donovan, who runs a Web site critical of Shell and acts as a conduit forwhistleblowers at the company, said Shell insiders had told him that John Stubbs, a senior project manager on Kashagan, had left the Anglo-Dutch oil major."unday Telegraph article about "Online revolutionaries"
On
9 September 2007 , The Sunday Telegraph published an article by Juliette Garside under the headline: [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/09/09/cnonline109.xml "Online revolutionaries"."] The opening sentence said: "Revolutions used to happen in the streets - these days they take place online. And the targets are more often big businesses than bad governments." The article included a section about Royaldutchshellplc.com and its owners, "Alfred Donovan, now in his 90s, and his son John." The article went on to say: "Their site became a hub for activists and disgruntled former employees. It has been used to mobilise support for environmental campaigns by the likes of WWF, the environmental lobbying group, against drilling in theArctic andRussia , for groups worried about Shell’s social impact inIreland andNigeria , and by the company’s former group auditor Bill Campbell to raise issues about employee safety."Essential reading for anyone who covers Shell
On
12 September 2007 , [http://blog.prospectblogs.com/2007/09/12/shells-colchester-headache/ an article] was published on theProspect Magazine website by a regular contributor, [http://derekbrower.com/about/ Derek Brower] , who is also the senior correspondent ofPetroleum Economist . Under the headline “Shell’sColchester headache”, Brower reminded readers that "“In Prospect’s February issue, I reported on John and Alfred Donovan, two men with a combined age of 150 years in a house in Colchester who have been trying relentlessly to prick holes in one of the world’s biggest companies, Shell. They seem to be succeeding. Their website has become essential reading for anyone who covers Shell and the energy sector more broadly. It gets up to 4.6m hits a month.”" Brewer went on to report that "“the Donovans have found another ruse to annoy Shell: theData Protection Act (DPA)”" and that "“So far, the company has surrendered two large folders, including an article about them by a director, apress release about them that the men claim isdefamatory , and much else.” " The article also said that Shell has not released under the DPA a copy of an email about them from Shell’s senior lawyer to the Chief Executive Officer of Royal Dutch Shell,Jeroen van der Veer and was "“paying the law firmSimmons & Simmons to handle their DPA requests”." It also reported that "“The company tried—and failed—to have their website closed down”" and revealed "“The Donovans say they have received CVs, business proposals, and even aterrorist threat sent to them: all were intended for Shell. (They kindly forwarded them on.)” " The last sentence in the article said: "“Asjournalists and disgruntled employees have realised, if you want to know what’s up at one of the world’s biggest companies—or just want a good moan about the latest oil spill—start with www.royaldutchshellplc.com.”"The Times reports Royal Dutch Shell at war with the Donovan family
On
22 September 2007 ,The Times newspaper [http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article2507722.ece reported] "Since the 1990s, Royal Dutch Shell has been atwar with a family who registered a website, royaldutchshellplc.com. The Donovan family, led by 90-year-oldBurma veteran Alfred, perhaps quixotically want Shell to change its management." The article said that Shell had "failed to shut down the site" which had attracted Shell job applications and even aterrorist threat "all of which are dutifully passed on to the company." The article went on to say "there are signs that Shell is developing a sense of humour. A recent letter from general counsel there suggests that “a truly alternative solution for all those people inadvertently contacting you is for you to choose a website and e-mail address without the word ‘Shell’ in it”."BBC Essex interviews John Donovan
On
11 October 2007 ,BBC Essex presenterEtholle George [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/10/14/bbc-radio-essex-unofficial-transcript-bbc-radio-essex-presenter-etholle-george-interviews-john-donovan/ interviewed] John Donovan concerning the website royaldutchshellplc.com. The interview was introduced as being "the story of a high techDavid and Goliath battle of the modern age." Etholle George asked questions about the websites Live Chat feature saying "I’ve got it up on my screen at the moment… there are currently 32 people who are engaged in conversation on your website… absolutely fascinating…" She later asked who the people were. The overall thrust of the questioning was that John Donovan must be obsessed to devote so much time to the website.Nikkei BP says “The fate of Sakhalin 2 was changed by two British men”
On
12 November 2007 , leadingJapan ese business magazine Nikkei BP published an internet [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/11/13/nikkei-bp-japan-gripe-sites-are-becoming-more-powerful/ article] about the Donovan’s and their website, royaldutchshellplc.com under the headline: "Gripe sites are becoming more powerful". It said "“The fate of Sakhalin 2 was changed by two British men”," described as “"a 90-year-old man and his son”" – a reference to Alfred Donovan and his son John. The author of the article, Ryo Kuroki, a Japanesenovelist , said that he had recently visited them at their home inColchester Essex , a town located in the South East of the UK. The article revealed that “Alfred had fought against the Japanese army in theBurmese front as acommunications officer.”The article went on to say that "“in October 2005 Donovans contacted Russian President
Vladimir Putin through the President’s website (The site has a function to send E-mail to the president). The purpose was to provide the president with insider information on the cost overrun of Sakhalin 2 project”." It also mentioned the approach made toOleg Mitvol , deputy head of Russia’s environmental watchdog Rosprirodnadzor and the later confirmation from Mitvol in his interview with Argus Media that “the Russian side used the information provided by Donovans in negotiations with project sponsors ofSakhalin-II .”Ethiopian “Jimma Times” mentions website in article about Shell lawsuit
On
17 December 2007 , anEthiopian newspaper, theJimma Times, published an internet [http://www.jimmatimes.com/article.cfm?articleID=17518 article] under the headline "“ETHIOPIAN Employees accuse Shell of raiding retirement fund”" reporting that "“Alitigation was brought against Shell by atrade union representing 90% of its Ethiopian employees.”" It went on to reveal that www.royaldutchshellplc.com had published an article about the story and in reference to the website said: "“The organization says its objective is to persuade Shell management to stand by the Shell Statement of General Business Principles pledging among other things,honesty ,integrity andtransparency in all of its dealings.”"Insider leaks news to RoyalDutchShellplc.com of thousands of IT job cuts at Shell
On
21 December 2007 , Reuters published a [http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKL2158046320071221 news story] with the headline: "Shell to cut thousands of IT jobs". The article reported that Shell is going to outsource a substantial part of its information technology operations with the intention of cutting costs "in a measure that may result in thousands of job losses". The article said "One employee told the Shell protest website RoyalDutchShellPlc.com that 3,200 jobs could be lost, but the spokeswoman declined to confirm the numbers." It went on to say that an internal Shell email had been supplied to the website which listed the IT outsourcing companies in final talks with Shell on taking on different aspects of the business.ITPro reported that news of Shell's outsourcing plans "“came to light via an internal company email forwarded to an unofficial site dedicated to providing news and insider information about Shell"." The [http://www.itpro.co.uk/news/154929/shells-it-outsourcing-plans-lambasted.html article] said: "“Shell hasn't yet put out an official announcement about its final IT outsourcing plans, but Michiel Brandjes, the company's secretary has responded to an email he received from the site where the rumours surfaced. "The email is authentic," he said in an email"." Mr Brandjes was also quoted as saying: "It is not a matter of a leak though”." He said information about Shell’s plans had been in the public domain for some time.
According to a related [http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200712240838DOWJONESDJONLINE000120_FORTUNE5.htm article] by Benoit Faucon of
Dow Jones Newswires published on 24 December byCNNMoney.com , the IT job cuts could improve the credibility ofPeter Voser , the Chief Financial Officer of Royal Dutch Shell Plc, to take over as Chief Executive of the company when the current CEO,Jeroen van der Veer , retires in June 2009. A Shell spokesperson was quoted as in the article as saying; "We are in the middle of commercial conversations and expect contracts to be signed early in 2008 - at which point we will share more details." The article went on to say "The talks were first reported on the Web site royaldutchshellplc.com, which is critical of the company. That report said thousands of jobs - among staff or contractors - could be cut as result."The Times describes site as “an independent website that monitors the company”
On 25 January 2008, Carl Mortished, World Business Editor of
The Times newspaper wrote an article headlined: [http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/wef/article3248484.ece “Shell chief fears oil shortage in seven years”] in which he described the site as “"an independent website that monitors the company.”" The article revealed thatJeroen van der Veer , Shell’s chief executive had stated in an e-mail sent to Shell employees and reported on the royaldutchshellplc.com website, that output of conventional oil and gas was close to peaking. In the leaked email, van der Veer stated: “"Shell estimates that after 2015 supplies of easy-to-access oil and gas will no longer keep up with demand.” " This was an important acknowledgement of a pending “Peak Oil” crisis. It was subsequently picked up by many other publications because of its global significance.The Wall Street Journal says website regularly used by Shell whistleblowers
On 18 March 2008,
The Wall Street Journal published an article headlined [http://www.shellnews.net/images/wsj17march08002.jpg“Shell Addresses Output Issue".] The report by Guy Chazan indicated Shell had attempted to dampen concerns over its petroleum reserves but had declined to give an indication of production in the short term, indicating that output will increase after 2010. The article went on to say that Shell CEOJeroen van der Veer had acknowledged the company's share-price performance had lagged behind almost all its main rivals over past three years, an outcome Mr van der Veer said was a "disappointment." The expression of his “disappointment” was contained in a memo sent by Mr. van der Veer to staff. The article said: “A copy was given to royaldutchshellplc.com, a Web site regularly used by Shellwhistleblowers . The memo revealed that Shell came in fourth out of five oil majors in terms of total shareholder return over the last three years, which measures share price growth and dividend payments. It said Shell laggedExxon Mobil Corp,Chevron Corporation , andTotal SA of France, though it was ahead of British majorBP PLC. Although Mr. van der Veer had called the outcome a "disappointment," he noted Shell's business results over the last three years were "strong."royaldutchshellplc.com articles featured on Thomson Reuters website
From April 2008,
Thomson Reuters , "the world's largest international multimedia news agency", has provided links on articles published on their [http://www.reuters.com/ website] to related articles published on royaldutchshellplc.com. Many of the linked [http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSL2622643720080526] articles relate toRoyal Dutch Shell and other oil companies such asExxonMobil ,BP , Chevron andConocoPhillips .Legal action by Shell relating to website
Due to an oversight, the management of the Royal Dutch Shell Group had not registered the dotcom name for the new company which resulted from the unification in 2005, of The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company Plc and the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company Limited. The domain name had already been registered by [http://shell2004.com/week22/shell_wages_legal_fight_over_web2june05.htm Alfred Donovan] , who exploited a loophole which allows an online critic to legally use a dotcom domain name identical to a target company's name or
trademark . To fall within this category, the gripe site must be non-commercial, with no subscriptions and no paid advertising. To avoid being considered acybersquatter the domain name and associated website must be active, with no attempt made to sell the domain name, especially to the company holding rights to the corresponding trademark or company name. Shell [http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2005/d2005-0538.html unsuccessfully] attempted to obtain viaWIPO proceedings, ownership of this address and two other Donovan owned domain names: royaldutchshellgroup.com and shellnews.net. [ [http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article555591.ece Times Online report mentioning the case] ] [ [http://news.com.com/5208-1030-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15271&messageID=129405&start=-1 News.com article] ] [ [http://shellnews.net/2006affidavit/shell-press-release-dated-17-march-1995.htm Press statement issued by Shell] (17 March 1995).] [ [http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/07/24/8381730/index.htm CNN Executive bookmark] ]Eight
Royal Dutch Shell Group companies collectively obtained in June 2004 an Interim Injunction and Restraining Order against a Shellwhistleblower , a Malaysiangeologist and former Shell employee, Dr John Huong, in respect of allegeddefamatory postings attributed to Dr Huong on the Donovan website. The Shell action is directed solely against Dr Huong. Further proceedings against Dr Huong were issued by the sameplaintiff companies in 2006 in respect of publications on the Donovan website in 2005 and 2006. The further proceedings include a "Notice to Show Cause" relating to a "contempt of court " action potentially punishable by imprisonment. Numerous [http://www.shellnews.net/2006affidavit/shellnewsnetaedaffidavitmay2006.htm proceedings] have been issued by Shell in connection with the on-going litigation. On6 August 2007 , Mr Michiel Brandjes, Company Secretary and General Counsel Corporate of Royal Dutch Shell Plc kindly [http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2007/08/06/in-high-praise-of-mr-michiel-brandjes-company-secretary-and-general-counsel-corporate-royal-dutch-shell-plc/ notified] 90 year old Alfred Donovan that the Shell plaintiff companies had "on compassionate grounds" waived the right to cross examine him in relation to an affidavit he had supplied in the Dr Huong case.References
External links
* http://www.royaldutchshellplc.com
* http://shellnews.net
* http://shell2004.com/
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.