Turner Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission

Turner Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission

SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Turner Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission
ArgueDate=January 12
ArgueYear=1994
DecideDate=June 27
DecideYear=1994
FullName=Turner Broadcasting System, Incorporated, et al., Appellants v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.
USVol=512
USPage=622
Citation=114 S. Ct. 2445; 129 L. Ed. 2d 497; 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4831; 62 U.S.L.W. 4647; 75 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 609; 22 Media L. Rep. 1865; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4831; 94 Daily Journal DAR 8894; 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 375
Prior=On appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Subsequent=
Holding=
SCOTUS=1993-1994
Majority=Kennedy
JoinMajority="unanimous" (part I); Rehnquist, Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg (parts II-A, II-B); Rehqnuist, Blackmun, Stevens, Souter (parts II-C, II-D, III-A)
Concurrence=Kennedy (parts III-B)
JoinConcurrence=Rehnquist, Blackmun, Souter
Concurrence2=Blackmun
Concurrence3=Stevens
Concurrence/Dissent=O'Connor
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=Scalia, Ginsburg; Thomas (parts I, III)
Concurrence/Dissent2=Ginsburg
LawsApplied=

"Turner Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission", 512 U.S. 622 (1994), is the second of two United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the must carry rules imposed on cable television companies. Turner Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission (I) was the first. "Turner I" established that cable television companies were indeed 1.) First Amendment speakers but didn't decide whether the federal regulation of their speech trenched upon their speech rights. Under the Miami Herald v. Tornillo case, it was unconstitutional to force a newspaper to run a story the editors would not have included absent a government statute because it was compelled speech which could not pass the strict scrutiny of a compelling state interest being achieved with the least restrictive means necessary to achieve the state interest. However, under the rule of Red Lion the High Court held that a federal agency could regulate broadcast stations (TV and Radio) with far greater discretion. In order for federal agency regulation of broadcast media to pass constitutional muster, it need only serve an important state interest and need not narrowly tailor its regulation to the least restrictive means. [http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/mediatests.htm See levels of First Amendment Protection for different media] CONCURRENCE (Stevens)- Congress’ policy judgment is entitled to substantial deference - Statute did not regulate the content of speech and therefore does not require the court to examine it with heightened scrutiny

ee also

*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 512


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission — Supreme Court of the United States Argued March 24, 2009 …   Wikipedia

  • American Broadcasting Company — Pour les articles homonymes, voir ABC. Type Réseau de télévision Réseau de …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Mutual Broadcasting System — Type Cooperative radio network (1934–52); corporate controlled radio network (1952–99) …   Wikipedia

  • Westinghouse Broadcasting — was formed in the 1920s as Westinghouse Radio Stations, Inc. It was renamed Westinghouse Broadcasting in 1954, and adopted the Group W moniker in 1963. It was a self contained entity within the Westinghouse corporate structure, and while the… …   Wikipedia

  • Hubbard Broadcasting Corporation — is an American television and radio broadcasting corporation based in St. Paul, Minnesota that was started by Stanley E. Hubbard. The corporation has broadcast outlets scattered across Minnesota, Wisconsin, New York, and New Mexico, though the… …   Wikipedia

  • New Democratic Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election — This is a list of nominated candidates for the New Democratic Party in the 40th Canadian federal election, which resulted in a Conservative minority government.[1] Contents 1 Newfoundland and Labrador 7 seats 2 Prince Edward Island 4 seats …   Wikipedia

  • New Democratic Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election — The New Democratic Party fielded a full slate of 308 candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election. It won 29 seats in the election to remain the fourth largest party in the House of Commons. Many of the New Democratic Party s candidates have… …   Wikipedia

  • Media and Publishing — ▪ 2007 Introduction The Frankfurt Book Fair enjoyed a record number of exhibitors, and the distribution of free newspapers surged. TV broadcasters experimented with ways of engaging their audience via the Internet; mobile TV grew; magazine… …   Universalium

  • Television and Radio — ▪ 1995 Introduction       Dominant trends in television and radio in 1994 included continuing globalization of services and programming and increased competition between cable and telephone companies. The industry s battle cry was expand or exit …   Universalium

  • Time Warner — Infobox Company company name =Time Warner Inc. company logo = company type =Public (NYSE|TWX) company slogan = foundation =Merger between Time Inc. and Warner Communications (1990); subsequently purchased by AOL (2001) location =Chicago (main)… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”