- Ex parte Endo
SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Ex parte Endo
ArgueDate=October 12
ArgueYear=1944
DecideDate=December 18
DecideYear=1944
FullName=Ex parte Mitsuye Endo
USVol=323
USPage=283
Citation=
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=The government cannot detain a citizen that the government itself concedes is loyal to the United States.
SCOTUS=1943-1945
Majority=Douglas
JoinMajority=unanimous court
Concurrence=Murphy
JoinConcurrence=
Concurrence2=Roberts
JoinConcurrence2=
Concurrence/Dissent=
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
Dissent=
JoinDissent=
Dissent2=
JoinDissent2=
LawsApplied="Ex parte Endo", or "Ex parte Mitsuye Endo", 323 U.S. 283 (
1944 ), [ussc|323|283|Full text of the decision courtesy of Findlaw.com] was aUnited States Supreme Court decision, handed down onDecember 18 1944 , the same day as their decision in "Korematsu v. United States ". In their decision, the Supreme Court ruled that, regardless of whether the United States Government had the right to exclude people of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast duringWorld War II , they could not continue to detain a citizen that the government itself conceded was loyal to theUnited States . This decision helped lead to the re-opening of the West Coast for resettlement by Japanese-American citizens following their internment in camps across the United States duringWorld War II .Mitsuye Endo, the plaintiff in the case, was evacuated from
Sacramento, California , in 1942, pursuant toExecutive Order 9066 and was removed to theTule Lake War Relocation Center located inModoc County, California . In July, 1942, she filed a petition for awrit of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, asking that she be discharged and restored to liberty. That petition was denied by the District Court in July, 1943, and an appeal was perfected to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in August, 1943.The court also found as part of this decision that if Congress is found to have ratified by appropriation any part of an executive agency program, the bill doing so must include a specific item referring to that portion of the program.
The unanimous opinion was written by
William O. Douglas , withFrank Murphy and Owen Roberts concurring.See also
*
Japanese American Internment
*"Yasui v. United States "
*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 323 References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.