Mathematical coincidence


Mathematical coincidence

A mathematical coincidence can be said to occur when two expressions show a near-equality that lacks direct theoretical explanation. For example, there's a near-equality around the round number 1000 between powers of two and powers of ten: 2^{10} = 1024 \approx 1000 = 10^3. Some of these coincidences are used in engineering when one expression is taken as an approximation of the other.

Contents

Introduction

A mathematical coincidence often involves an integer, and the surprising (or "coincidental") feature is the fact that a real number arising in some context is considered by some ill-defined standard as a "close" approximation to a small integer or to a multiple or power of ten, or more generally, to a rational number with a small denominator.

Given the countably infinite number of ways of forming mathematical expressions using a finite number of symbols, the number of symbols used and the precision of approximate equality might be the most obvious way to assess mathematical coincidences; but there is no standard, and the strong law of small numbers is the sort of thing one has to appeal to with no formal opposing mathematical guidance.[citation needed] Beyond this, some sense of mathematical aesthetics could be invoked to adjudicate the value of a mathematical coincidence, and there are in fact exceptional cases of true mathematical significance (see Ramanujan's constant below, which made it into print some years ago as a scientific April Fools' joke[1]). All in all, though, they are generally to be considered for their curiosity value or, perhaps, to encourage new mathematical learners at an elementary level.

Some examples

Rational approximants

Sometimes simple rational approximations are exceptionally close to interesting irrational values. These are explainable in terms of large terms in the continued fraction representation of the irrational value, but further insight into why such improbably large terms occur is often not available.

Rational approximants (convergents of continued fractions) to ratios of logs of different numbers are often invoked as well, making coincidences between the powers of those numbers.[2]

Many other coincidences are combinations of numbers that put them into the form that such rational approximants provide close relationships.

Concerning pi

  • The first convergent of π, [3; 7] = 22/7 = 3.1428..., was known to Archimedes,[3] and is correct to about 0.04%. The third convergent of π, [3; 7, 15, 1] = 355/113 = 3.1415929..., found by Zu Chongzhi,[4] is correct to six decimal places;[3] this high accuracy comes about because π has an unusually large next term in its continued fraction representation: π = [3; 7, 15, 1, 292, ...].[5]
  • The Feynman point is a sequence of six 9s that begins at the 762nd decimal place of the decimal representation of pi. For a randomly chosen normal number, the probability of any chosen number sequence of six digits (including 6 of a number, 658020, or the like) occurring this early in the decimal representation is only 0.08%. Pi is conjectured, but not known, to be a normal number.

Concerning base 2

  • The coincidence 2^{10} = 1024 \approx 1000 = 10^3, correct to 2.4%, relates to the rational approximation \textstyle\frac{\log10}{\log2} \approx 3.3219 \approx \frac{10}{3}, or  2 \approx 10^{3/10} to within 0.3%. This relationship is used in engineering, for example to approximate a factor of two in power as 3 dB (actual is 3.0103 dB – see 3dB-point), or to relate a kilobyte to a kibibyte; see binary prefix.[6][7]
  • This coincidence can also be expressed 5^3 = 125 \approx 128 = 2^7 , and is invoked for instance in shutter speed settings on cameras, as approximations to powers of two in the sequence of speeds 125, 250, 500, etc.[2]

Concerning musical intervals

  • The coincidence \sqrt[9]{0.6}\sqrt[28]{4.9} = 0.99999999754\ldots \approx 1 leads to the very tiny interval of 293 − 285377 − 18 (about a millicent wide), which is the first 7-limit interval tempered out in 103169-TET.[citation needed]

Numerical expressions

Concerning powers of pi

  • \pi^2\approx10; correct to about 1.3%.[8] This can be understood in terms of the formula for the zeta function ζ(2) = π2 / 6.[9] This coincidence was used in the design of slide rules, where the "folded" scales are folded on π rather than \sqrt{10}, because it is a more useful number and has the effect of folding the scales in about the same place.[citation needed]
  • \pi^2\approx 227/23, correct to 0.0004%.[8]
  • \pi\approx\left(9^2+\frac{19^2}{22}\right)^{1/4}, or \pi^4\approx 2143/22;[10] accurate to 8 decimal places (due to Ramanujan: Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, XLV, 1914, pp350–372). Ramanujan states that this "curious approximation" to π was "obtained empirically" and has no connection with the theory developed in the remainder of the paper.

Some plausible relations hold to a high degree of accuracy, but are nevertheless coincidental. One example is:


\int_{0}^{\infty}\cos(2x)\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}\cos\left(\frac{x}{n}\right)dx \approx \frac{\pi}{8}

The two sides of this expression only differ after the 42nd decimal place.[11]

Containing both pi and e

  • \pi^4+\pi^5\approx e^6, within 0.000 005%[10]
  • e^\pi - \pi\approx 19.99909998 is very close to 20 (Conway, Sloane, Plouffe, 1988); this is equivalent to (\pi+20)^i=-0.999 999 999 2\ldots -i\cdot 0.000 039\ldots \approx -1[10]

Containing pi or e and numbers 163 and 22

Other numerical curiosities

Decimal coincidences

  • 2^5 \cdot 9^2 = 2592. This makes 2592 a nice Friedman number.[19]
  • \,1! + 4! + 5! = 145. The only such factorions (in base 10) are 1, 2, 145, 40585.[20]
  • \frac {16} {64} = \frac {1\!\!\!\not6} {\not6  4} = \frac {1} {4},    \frac {26} {65} = \frac {2\!\!\!\not6} {\not6  5} = \frac {2} {5},    \frac {19} {95} = \frac {1\!\!\!\not9} {\not9  5} = \frac {1} {5},    \frac{49}{98}=\frac{4\!\!\!\not9}{\not98}=\frac{4}{8} (anomalous cancellation[21])
  • \,(4 + 9 + 1 + 3)^3 = 4{,}913 and \,(1 + 9 + 6 + 8 + 3)^3=19{,}683.[22]
  • \,2^7 - 1 = 127. This can also be written \,127 = -1 + 2^7, making 127 the smallest nice Friedman number.[19]
  • \,1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3 = 153 ; \,3^3 + 7^3 + 0^3 = 370 ; \,3^3 + 7^3 +1^3 = 371 ; \,4^3 + 0^3 +7^3 = 407 — all narcissistic numbers[23]
  • \,(3 + 4)^3 = 343 [24]
  • \,588^2+2353^2 = 5882353 and also \, 1/17 = 0.0588235294117647\ldots when rounded to 8 digits is 0.05882353. Mentioned by Gilbert Labelle in ~1980.[citation needed] 5882353 also happens to be prime.
  • \,2646798 = 2^1+6^2+4^3+6^4+7^5+9^6+8^7. The largest such number is 12157692622039623539.[25]
  • 73 is the 21st prime and 37 is the 12th prime. Both are reverse numbers. It is the only known combination.

Numerical coincidences in numbers from the physical world

Speed of light

The speed of light is exactly 299,792,458 m/s, very close to 300,000 km/s. This is a pure coincidence.[26]

Earth's diameter

The diameter of the Earth is almost exactly half a billion inches. The polar diameter of Earth is 500531678 inches and the equatorial diameter is 502215511 inches.[26]

Gravitational acceleration

While not constant but varying depending on latitude, the acceleration caused by Earth's gravity on the surface lies between 9.78 and 9.82 m/s2, which is quite close to 10. This means that as a result of Newton's second law, the weight of a kilogram of mass on Earth's surface corresponds roughly to 10 Newtons of force exerted on an object.[citation needed]

Rydberg constant

The Rydberg constant, when multiplied by the speed of light and expressed as a frequency, is close to \frac{\pi^2}{3}\times 10^{15} \text{Hz}:[26]

3.289841960364(17) \times 10^{15} \text{Hz}[27]

3.28986813369645287294483... = \frac{\pi^2}{3}

See also

References

  1. ^ Reprinted as Gardner, Martin (2001), "Six Sensational Discoveries", The Colossal Book of Mathematics, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, pp. 674–694, ISBN 0-393-02023-1. 
  2. ^ a b c Manfred Robert Schroeder (2008). Number theory in science and communication (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 26–28. ISBN 9783540852971. http://books.google.com/?id=2KV2rfP0yWEC&pg=PA27&dq=coincidence+circle-of-fifths+1024+7-octaves+%22one+part+in+a+thousand%22. 
  3. ^ a b Petr Beckmann (1971). A History of Pi. Macmillan. pp. 101, 170. ISBN 9780312381851. http://books.google.com/?id=TB6jzz3ZDTEC&pg=PA101&dq=pi+113+355++digits. 
  4. ^ Yoshio Mikami (1913). Development of Mathematics in China and Japan. B. G. Teubner. p. 135. http://books.google.com/?id=4e9LAAAAMAAJ&q=intitle:Development+intitle:%22China+and+Japan%22+355&dq=intitle:Development+intitle:%22China+and+Japan%22+355. 
  5. ^ Eric W. Weisstein (2003). CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics. CRC Press. p. 2232. ISBN 9781584883470. http://books.google.com/?id=_8TyhSqHUiEC&pg=PA2232&dq=pi+113+355++292+convergent. 
  6. ^ Ottmar Beucher (2008). Matlab und Simulink. Pearson Education. p. 195. ISBN 9783827373403. http://books.google.com/?id=VgLCb7B3OtYC&pg=PA195&dq=3.0103+1024+1000. 
  7. ^ K. Ayob (2008). Digital Filters in Hardware: A Practical Guide for Firmware Engineers. Trafford Publishing. p. 278. ISBN 9781425142469. http://books.google.com/?id=6nmnbIxpY3MC&pg=PA278&dq=3.0103-db. 
  8. ^ a b Frank Rubin, The Contest Center - Pi.
  9. ^ Why is π2 so close to 10?, Noam Elkies
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Weisstein, Eric W., "Almost Integer" from MathWorld.
  11. ^ http://crd.lbl.gov/~dhbailey/dhbpapers/math-future.pdf
  12. ^ Ramanujan, S. (1913/14). "Modular Equations and Approximations to pi". Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math. 45: 350–372. 
  13. ^ Harvey Heinz, Narcissistic Numbers.
  14. ^ a b Weisstein, Eric W., "Beast Number" from MathWorld.
  15. ^ Ask Dr. Math, "Solving the Equation x^y = y^x".
  16. ^ Prime Curios!: 33333331 at The Prime Pages.
  17. ^ David Broadhurst, "Prime Curios!: 10660...49391 (61899-digits)".
  18. ^ Richard Arratia, Larry Goldstein, and Louis Gordon (1990). "Poisson approximation and the Chen-Stein method". Statistical Science 5 (4): 403–434. http://www.stat.wisc.edu/courses/st992-newton/smmb/files/align/arratia.pdf. 
  19. ^ a b Erich Friedman, Problem of the Month (August 2000).
  20. ^ (sequence A014080 in OEIS)
  21. ^ Weisstein, Eric W., "Anomalous Cancellation" from MathWorld.
  22. ^ (sequence A061209 in OEIS)
  23. ^ (sequence A005188 in OEIS)
  24. ^ Prime Curios!: 343.
  25. ^ (sequence A032799 in OEIS)
  26. ^ a b c Michon, Gérard P.. "Numerical Coincidences in Man-Made Numbers". Mathematical Miracles. http://www.numericana.com/answer/miracles.htm. Retrieved 29 April 2011. 
  27. ^ "Rydberg constant times c in Hz". Fundamental physical constants. NIST. http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?rydchz. Retrieved 25 July 2011. 

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Coincidence — For more on simultaneous events, see Concurrency (disambiguation). It is no great wonder if in long process of time, while fortune takes her course hither and thither, numerous coincidences should spontaneously occur. Plutarch. Plutarch s Lives:… …   Wikipedia

  • Coïncidence mathématique — En mathématiques, une coïncidence mathématique est une expression de quasi égalité entre deux quantités, sans qu’il y ait une explication théorique directe. Sommaire 1 Introduction 2 Quelques exemples 2.1 Formules avec π 2.2 …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Coincidence point — In mathematics, a coincidence point (or simply coincidence) of two mappings is a point in their domain having the same image point under both mappings. Formally, given two mappings we say that a point x in X is a coincidence point of f and g if… …   Wikipedia

  • Mathematical joke — A mathematical joke is a form of humor which relies on aspects of mathematics or a stereotype of mathematicians to derive humor. The humor may come from a pun, or from a double meaning of a mathematical term. It may also come from a lay person s… …   Wikipedia

  • Coincidence of wants — Economics …   Wikipedia

  • List of mathematics articles (M) — NOTOC M M estimator M group M matrix M separation M set M. C. Escher s legacy M. Riesz extension theorem M/M/1 model Maass wave form Mac Lane s planarity criterion Macaulay brackets Macbeath surface MacCormack method Macdonald polynomial Machin… …   Wikipedia

  • Almost integer — Ed Pegg, Jr. noted that the length d equals that is very close to 7 (7.0000000857 ca.)[1] In recreational mathematics an …   Wikipedia

  • Generalized continued fraction — In analysis, a generalized continued fraction is a generalization of regular continued fractions in canonical form in which the partial numerators and the partial denominators can assume arbitrary real or complex values.A generalized continued… …   Wikipedia

  • Experimental mathematics — For the mathematical journal of the same name, see Experimental Mathematics (journal) Experimental mathematics is an approach to mathematics in which numerical computation is used to investigate mathematical objects and identify properties and… …   Wikipedia

  • Strong Law of Small Numbers — In his humorous 1988 paper The Strong Law of Small Numbers, the mathematician Richard K. Guy makes the statement that There aren t enough small numbers to meet the many demands made of them. In other words, any given small number appears in far… …   Wikipedia


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.