2003 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas

2003 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas

Concurrence
width=25px
Concurrence/dissent
white-space: nowrap |Total =
27
-
colspan=2 | Bench opinions = 27
colspan=2 | Opinions relating to orders = 0
colspan=2 | In-chambers opinions = 0
-
white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top | Unanimous decisions: 5
colspan=2 valign=top | Most joined by: Scalia (14)
colspan=2 valign=top | Least joined by: Souter, Breyer (5)
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Campaign finance reform
width=20% valign=top | Scalia (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Scalia; Rehnquist (in part)
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Kennedy
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Rehnquist, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Scalia filed a dissent.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Scalia
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas filed one of two dissents from Rehnquist's 7-2 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Breyer
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Scalia
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas dissented from Ginsburg's 7-2 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Bankruptcy; Eleventh Amendment
width=20% valign=top | Scalia
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas dissented from Rehnquist's 7-2 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Bankruptcy
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Americans with Disabilities Act; state sovereign immunity
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas filed one of three dissents from Stevens' 5-4 decision.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Standing; Establishment Clause
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas was the sole dissenter from Ginsburg's 8-1 opinion.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Unanimous
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Ginsburg and Breyer filed dissents.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas filed one of three dissents from O'Connor's 6-3 opinion.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Scalia
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Stevens and Souter filed dissents.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top | Due process, habeas corpus
width=20% valign=top |
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Thomas dissented from the plurality's ruling that citizens of the U.S. designated as enemy combatants by the Executive Branch had the right to challenge their detention. Thomas, the only member of the Court to fully adopt the government's position, argued that the Court should defer to the broad war-making powers of the President, particularly in light of the important security interests at stake in the War on Terror.
-
align=right valign=top
valign=top |
width=20% valign=top | Rehnquist, Scalia
-
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | Souter and Breyer filed dissents.


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”