Venus of Tan-Tan

, might be the earliest representations of the human form.

Made from quartzite, it was painted with red ochre indicating a possible symbolic importance. It may be one of the earliest representations of pigmentation application found. It was discovered in 1999, during an archaeological survey by Lutz Fiedler, state archaeologist of Hesse, Germany, in a river terrace deposit on the north bank of the Draa River a few kilometers south of the Moroccan town of Tan-Tan.

It is often categorised as one of the Venus figurines, although there is some controversy amongst archaeologists as to its nature and origin. To its discoverer and others, e.g., Robert Bednarik [See for instance:
Robert G. Bednarik. 2003. A figurine from the African Acheulian. Current Anthropology 44(3): 405-13.
[http://www.scirus.com/srsapp/sciruslink?src=web&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmc2.vicnet.net.au%2Fhome%2Fcognit%2Fshared_files%2FBednarik_2003.pdf Robert G. Bednarik. 2003. The earliest evidence of paleoart. Rock Art Research 20 (2): 89-135.]
[http://witcombe.sbc.edu/ARTHprehistoric.html Resources for the study of art history. Part 1 Prehistoric Art ] ] , the object probably had a general human-like shape that was accentuated by carving it with a stone-wedge; some artificial smudge stains are interpreted as remnants of pigments used by humans to further accentuate its human-like form. For others, for instance Professor Stanley Ambrose of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign [See [http://howcomyoucom.com/selfnews/viewnews.cgi?newsid1053716489,17812,.shtml details about controversy here] ] , it is a total fortuitous event that natural weathering and erosion have produced this human-like object.

Notes

ee also

* Pre-historic art
* Venus of Berekhat Ram

External links

*http://donsmaps.com/tantanvenus.html