- Formal semantics
Formal semantics of programming languages."
Formal semantics is the study of the
semantics, or interpretations, of formal languages. A formal language can be defined apart from any interpretation of it. This is done by designating a setof symbols (also called an alphabet) and a set of formation rules(also called a "formal grammar") which determine which strings of symbols are well-formed formulas. When transformation rules(also called "rules of inference") are added, and certain sentences are accepted as axioms (together called a deductive systemor a "deductive apparatus") a logical systemis formed. An interpretation is an assignment of meanings to these symbols and truth-values to its sentences. [The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, "Formal semantics"]
The truth conditions of various sentences we may encounter in
arguments will depend upon their meaning, and so conscientious logicians cannot completely avoid the need to provide some treatment of the meaning of these sentences. The semantics of logic refers to the approaches that logicians have introduced to understand and determine that part of meaning in which they are interested; the logician traditionally is not interested in the sentence as uttered but in the proposition, an idealised sentence suitable for logical manipulation.
Until the advent of modern logic,
Aristotle's " Organon", especially " De Interpretatione", provided the basis for understanding the significance of logic. The introduction of quantification, needed to solve the problem of multiple generality, rendered impossible the kind of subject-predicate analysis that governed Aristotle's account, although there is a renewed interest in term logic, attempting to find calculi in the spirit of Aristotle's syllogistic but with the generality of modern logics based on the quantifier.
The main modern approaches to semantics for formal languages are the following:
Model-theoretic semanticsis the archetype of Alfred Tarski's semantic theory of truth, based on his T-schema, and is one of the founding concepts of model theory. This is the most widespread approach, and is based on the idea that the meaning of the various parts of the propositions are given by the possible ways we can give a recursively specified group of interpretation functions from them to some predefined mathematical domains: an interpretation of first-order predicate logicis given by a mapping from terms to a universe of individuals, and a mapping from propositions to the truth values "true" and "false". Model-theoretic semantics provides the foundations for an approach to the theory of meaning known as Truth-conditional semantics, which was pioneered by Donald Davidson. Kripke semanticsintroduces innovations, but is broadly in the Tarskian mold.
Proof-theoretic semanticsassociates the meaning of propositions with the roles that they can play in inferences. Gerhard Gentzen, Dag Prawitzand Michael Dummettare generally seen as the founders of this approach; it is heavily influenced by Ludwig Wittgenstein's later philosophy, especially his aphorism "meaning is use".
Truth-value semantics(also commonly referred to as "substitutional quantification") was advocated by Ruth Barcan Marcusfor modal logics in the early 1960s and later championed by Dunn, Belnap, and Leblanc for standard first-order logic. James Garson has given some results in the areas of adequacy for intensional logics outfitted with such a semantics. The truth conditions for quantified formulas are given purely in terms of truth with no appeal to domains whatsoever (and hence its name "truth-value semantics").
* Game-theoretical semantics has made a resurgence lately mainly due to
Jaakko Hintikkafor logics of (finite) partially ordered quantification which were originally investigated by Leon Henkin, who studied "Henkin quantifiers".
Probabilistic semanticsoriginated from H. Field and has been shown equivalent to and a natural generalization of truth-value semantics. Like truth-value semantics, it is also non-referential in nature.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
formal semantics — noun The study of the semantics, or interpretations, of formal languages … Wiktionary
formal semantics — noun the branch of semantics that studies the logical aspects of meaning • Hypernyms: ↑semantics … Useful english dictionary
Formal semantics of programming languages — In theoretical computer science, formal semantics is the field concerned with the rigorous mathematical study of the meaning of programming languages and models of computation. The formal semantics of a language is given by a mathematical model… … Wikipedia
Semantics — is the study of meaning in communication. The word derives from Greek σημαντικός ( semantikos ), significant , [cite web|url=http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3D%2393797|title=Semantikos, Henry… … Wikipedia
Formal epistemology — is a subdiscipline of epistemology that utilizes formal methods from logic, probability theory and computability theory to elucidate traditional epistemic problems. TopicsSome of the topics that come under the heading of formal epistemology… … Wikipedia
Formal interpretation — A formal interpretation [http://books.google.com/books?id=weKqT3ka5g0C pg=PA74 lpg=PA74 dq=%22Formal+interpretation%22+%22formal+language%22 source=web ots=pLN ms7Wi2 sig=P JqwdzOqLcX4nMpP64qmacnkDU hl=en#PPA74,M1 Cann Ronnie, Formal Semantics:… … Wikipedia
Formal proof — See also: mathematical proof, proof theory, and axiomatic system A formal proof or derivation is a finite sequence of sentences (called well formed formulas in the case of a formal language) each of which is an axiom or follows from the… … Wikipedia
Formal grammar — In formal semantics, computer science and linguistics, a formal grammar (also called formation rules) is a precise description of a formal language ndash; that is, of a set of strings over some alphabet. In other words, a grammar describes which… … Wikipedia
Formal verification — In the context of hardware and software systems, formal verification is the act of proving or disproving the correctness of intended algorithms underlying a system with respect to a certain formal specification or property, using formal methods… … Wikipedia
Formal system — In formal logic, a formal system (also called a logical system,Audi, Robert (Editor). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy . Second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1999. ISBN 978 0521631365 (hardcover) and ISBN 978 0521637220 (paperback).] … Wikipedia