Conflict escalation

Conflict escalation

Conflict escalation describes the escalation of a conflict to a more destructive, confrontational, painful, or otherwise "less comfortable" level; in particular, it is concerned with how persons or forces can be controlled or subdued in conflict. In systems theory, this kind of behaviour is modeled as positive feedback.

Conflict escalation has a tactical role in military conflict, and is often formalized with explicit rules of engagement. Highly successful military tactics exploit a particular form of conflict esclation; for example, controlling an opponents reaction time allows the tactician to pursue or trap his opponent. Napoleon, Heinz Guderian, and Sun Tzu advocated this approach; however, the latter elaborated it in a more abstract form, and additionally maintained that military strategy was about minimizing escalation, and diplomacy about eliminating it.

Contents

Continuum of Force

The United States Marine Corps' "Continuum of Force" (found in MCRP 3-02B) documents the stages of Conflict escalation in combat for a typical subject. They are:

  • Level 1: Compliant (Cooperative).

The subject responds to and obeys verbal commands. He refrains from close combat.

  • Level 2: Resistant (Passive).

The subject resists verbal commands but complies to commands immediately upon contact controls. He refrains from close combat.

  • Level 3: Resistant (Active).

Initially, the subject physically resists commands, but he can be made to comply by compliance techniques; these include come-along holds, soft-handed stunning blows, and techniques inducing pain by joint manipulation and pressure points.

  • Level 4: Assaultive (Bodily Harm).

The unarmed subject physically attacks his opponent. He can be controlled by certain defensive tactics, including blocks, strikes, kicks, enhanced pain compliance procedures, impact weapon blocks and blows.

  • Level 5: Assaultive (Lethal Force).

The subject has a weapon and will likely kill or injure someone unless controlled. This is only possible by lethal force, which possibly requires firearms or weapons.

Preventing conflict escalation

A major focus of peace and conflict theory is concerned with curbing conflict escalation or creating a mindset to avoid such conflict in future, and instead engaging in peacemaking. Much nonviolent conflict resolution, however, involves conflict escalation in the form of protests, strikes, or other direct actions.

Mohandas Gandhi, a major theorist of nonviolence, used satyagraha to demonstrate that:

  • Peacefully controlling a group of people with a common cause was possible.
  • One could accomplish objectives through solidarity without capitulating to violent attack.
  • His method ensured mutual support.
  • It was possible to desist from retributive justice.
  • It was not ultimately desirable to inflict punishment, even when grievously wronged.

With this method of escalation, Gandhi avoided technological escalation and demonstrated to those in power that:

  • The group was held together by its own discipline, and not by any kind of authority using violence.
  • Authority could surrender without being subjected to violence.
  • Authority could depart safely.
  • Authority could devolve without obstacles, for the dissent was well enough organized to constitute an effective political party

Systems view

Gandhi himself did not elaborate all these observations; Carol Moore, a later theorist, examined and described Gandhi's methods from the perspective of systems theory. Jay Forrester and Donella Meadows observed that people in crisis would often push the twelve leverage points towards escalation in the first stage, and then reduce escalation when the resistance had weakened and it was impossible to maintain the status quo.[citation needed]

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Escalation — is the phenomenon of something getting more intense step by step, for example a quarrel, or, notably, a war between states possessing weapons of mass destruction. Compare to escalator, a device that lifts something to a higher level. While the… …   Wikipedia

  • Conflict early warning — The field of conflict early warning seeks to forecast the outbreak of armed conflict, or, at minimum, to detect the early escalation of violence, with the objective of preventing the outbreak or the further escalation of violence in order to save …   Wikipedia

  • escalation — noun ADJECTIVE ▪ dramatic, major, serious ▪ rapid ▪ gradual ▪ further ▪ military …   Collocations dictionary

  • Conflict theory — Sociology …   Wikipedia

  • Escalation hypothesis — The Escalation Hypothesis is a theory put forward by Geerat J. Vermeij. It states that organisms are in constant conflict with one another and therefore devote lots of resources to thwarting the adaptations evolution brings to all competing… …   Wikipedia

  • escalation — noun a) an increase or rise, especially one to counteract a perceived discrepancy b) a deliberate or premeditated increase in the violence or geographic scope of a …   Wiktionary

  • escalation — A deliberate or unpremeditated increase in scope or violence of a conflict …   Military dictionary

  • Technological escalation — describes the fact that whenever two parties are in competition, each side tends to employ continuing technological improvements to defeat the other. Technology is defined here as a creative invention, be it an object or a method of using an… …   Wikipedia

  • De-escalation — This is a commonlly used term in Social Work practice. It is used as an anger management tool to remove tension between two participants in a conflictual relationship or intervention. A cooling off period is experienced and then the potential for …   Wikipedia

  • Chadian–Libyan conflict — Chadian Libyan conflict Chadian soldiers in a Toyota pickup modified into a technical …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”