Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB

Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB

SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB
ArgueDate=November 6-7
ArgueYear=1950
ReargueDate=
ReargueYear=
DecideDate=February 26
DecideYear=1951
FullName=Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Citation=340 U.S. 474 (1951)
USVol=340
USPage=474
Prior="Universal Camera Corp.", 79 N.L.R.B. 379, 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) (1948); "Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB", 179 F.2d 749 (2nd Cir. 1950) (enforcing order)
Subsequent=
Holding=a court will defer to a federal agency's findings of fact if supported by "substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole."
Oral Argument=
SCOTUS=1949-1953
Majority=Frankfurter
JoinMajority=Vinson, Reed, Jackson, Burton, Clark, Minton
Concurrence/Dissent=Black, Douglas
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
LawsApplied=Administrative Procedures Act; Taft-Hartley Act

"Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB", 340 U.S. 474 (1951), the United States Supreme Court held that a court will defer to a federal agency's findings of fact if supported by "substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole."

Background

Court's Decision

Critical response

ee also

* List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 340


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”