# Oberth effect

﻿
Oberth effect

In astronautics, the Oberth effect is where the use of a rocket engine when travelling at high speed generates much more useful energy than one at low speed. Oberth effect occurs because the propellant has more usable energy (due to its kinetic energy on top of its chemical potential energy) and it turns out that the vehicle is able to employ this kinetic energy to generate more mechanical power. It is named after Hermann Oberth, the Hungarian-born, German physicist and a founder of modern rocketry, who apparently first described the effect.[1]

Oberth effect is used in a powered flyby or Oberth maneuver where the application of an impulse, typically from the use of a rocket engine, close to a gravitational body (where the gravity potential is low, and the speed is high) can give much more change in kinetic energy and final speed (i.e. higher specific energy) than the same impulse applied further from the body for the same initial orbit. For the Oberth effect to be most effective, the vehicle must be able to generate as much impulse as possible at the lowest possible altitude; thus the Oberth effect is often far less useful for low-thrust reaction engines such as ion drives, which have a low propellant flow rate.

Oberth effect also can be used to understand the behaviour of multi-stage rockets; the upper stage can generate much more usable kinetic energy than might be expected from simply considering the chemical energy of the propellants it carries.

Historically, a lack of understanding of this effect led early investigators to conclude that interplanetary travel would require completely impractical amounts of propellant, as without it, enormous amounts of energy are needed.[1]

## Description

Rocket engines produce the same force regardless of their velocity. A rocket acting on a fixed object or particularly heavy item, as in a static firing, does little or no useful work at all; the rocket's stored energy is entirely expended on accelerating its propellant to hypersonic speed. But when the rocket moves, the thrust of the rocket during any time interval acts through the distance the rocket and payload move during that time. Force acting through a distance is the definition of mechanical energy or work. So the farther the rocket and payload move during the burn, (i.e. the faster they move), the greater the kinetic energy imparted to the rocket and its payload.

This can be easily shown. The definition of mechanical work:

$\Delta E = F \cdot s \;$

Where:

E is the energy (specifically the kinetic energy), F is the force- the thrust of the rocket which is considered constant, and s is the distance

Differentiating with respect to time:

$\frac {{dE}} {{dt}} = F \cdot \frac {{ds}} {{dt}}$

Or:

$\frac {{dE}} {{dt}} = F \cdot v$

where v is the velocity.

dividing by the instantaneous mass m to express this in terms of specific energy (S)

$\frac {{dS}} {{dt}} = \frac F m \cdot v = a \cdot v$

where a is the acceleration vector.

Thus it can be readily seen that the rate of gain of specific energy of every part of the rocket is proportional to speed, and given this the equation can be integrated to calculate the overall increase in specific energy of the rocket.

However, integrating this is often unnecessary, if the burn is short. For example as a vehicle falls towards periapsis in any orbit (closed or escape orbits) the velocity relative to the central body increases. Briefly burning the engine (an 'impulsive burn') prograde at periapsis increases the velocity by the same increment as at any other time (Δv). However, since the vehicle's kinetic energy is related to the square of its velocity, this increase in velocity has a disproportionate effect on the vehicle's kinetic energy; leaving it with higher energy than if the burn were achieved at any other time.[2]

It may seem that the rocket is getting energy for free, which would violate conservation of energy. However, any gain to the rocket's energy is balanced by an equal decrease in the energy the exhaust is left with. When expended lower in the gravitational field, even if the exhaust is left with more kinetic energy, it is left with less total energy. The effect would be even stronger if the exhaust speed could be made equal to the speed of the rocket, then the exhaust would be left without kinetic energy, so the total energy of the exhaust would be as low as its potential energy. Contrast this to the situation of static firing: as the speed of the engine is zero its specific energy does not increase at all, with all chemical energy of the fuel being converted to the exhaust's kinetic energy.

At very high speed the mechanical power imparted to the rocket can even exceed the total power liberated in the combustion of the propellants, and this may also seem to violate conservation of energy. But the propellants in a fast moving rocket carry energy not only chemically but also in their own kinetic energy, which at speeds above a few km/s actually exceed the chemical component. When these propellants are burned, some of this kinetic energy is transferred to the rocket along with the chemical energy released by burning. This can make up for what seems like an extremely low efficiency early in the rocket's flight when it is moving only slowly. Most of the work done by a rocket early in flight is "invested" in the kinetic energy of the propellant not yet burned, part of which they will release later when they are burned.

## Parabolic example

If the ship travels at velocity v at the start of a burn that changes the velocity by Δv, then the change in specific orbital energy (SOE) is

$v \, \Delta v + \frac{(\Delta v)^2}{2}.$

Once the space craft is far from the planet again, the SOE is entirely kinetic, since gravitational potential energy tends to zero. Therefore, the larger the v at the time of the burn, the greater the final kinetic energy, and the higher the final velocity.

The effect becomes more pronounced the closer to the central body, or more generally, the deeper in the gravitational field potential the burn occurs, since the velocity is higher there.

So if a spacecraft is on a parabolic flyby of Jupiter with a periapsis velocity of 50 km/s, and it performs a 5 km/s burn, it turns out that the final velocity change at great distance is 22.9 km/s; giving a multiplication of the burn by 4.6 times.

## Detailed proof

If an impulsive burn of Δv is performed at periapsis in a parabolic orbit then the velocity at periapsis before the burn is equal to the escape velocity (Vesc), and the specific kinetic energy after the burn is:

$\tfrac{1}{2} V^2$

where V = Vesc + Δv

$= \tfrac{1}{2} (V_\text{esc} + \Delta v )^2$
$= \tfrac{1}{2} V_\text{esc} ^ 2 + \Delta v V_\text{esc} + \tfrac{1}{2} \Delta v^2$

When the vehicle leaves the gravity field, the loss of specific kinetic energy is:

$\tfrac{1}{2} V_\text{esc}^2$

so it retains the energy:

$\Delta v V_\text{esc} + \tfrac{1}{2} \Delta v^2$

which is larger than the energy from a burn outside the gravitational field ($\tfrac{1}{2} \Delta v^2$) by:

$\Delta v V_\text{esc} \;$

It can then be easily shown that the impulse is multiplied by a factor of:

$\sqrt{1 +\frac{2 V_\text{esc}}{\Delta v}}$

Plugging in 50 km/s escape velocity and 5 km/s burn we get a multiplier of 4.6.

Similar effects happen in closed and hyperbolic orbits.

## References

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

### Look at other dictionaries:

• Oberth — may refer to: Hermann Oberth (1894–1989), Austro Hungarian born German physicist and engineer Hermann Oberth Gesellschaft Oberth class starship (Star Trek) Oberth (crater) Hermann Oberth Space Travel Museum Oberth effect (astrodynamics) See also… …   Wikipedia

• Hermann Oberth — Infobox Scientist name = Hermann Oberth box width = image width =150px caption =Oberth (in front) with fellow ABMA employees. Left to right: Dr. Ernst Stuhlinger, Major General Holger Toftoy, Oberth, Dr. Wernher von Braun, and Dr. Robert Lusser… …   Wikipedia

• Efecto Oberth — Saltar a navegación, búsqueda El efecto Oberth o sobrevuelo propulsado(powered flyby) es una característica de la astronáutica donde se usa un motor de cohete cerca de un cuerpo gravitatorio que, para una misma órbita inicial, puede dar un cambio …   Wikipedia Español

• Delta-v budget — (or velocity change budget) is an astrogation term used in astrodynamics and aerospace industry for total delta v (or total velocity change) requirements for the various propulsive tasks and orbital maneuvers over phases of a space mission.… …   Wikipedia

• Orbital mechanics — A satellite orbiting the earth has a tangential velocity and an inward acceleration. Orbital mechanics or astrodynamics is the application of ballistics and celestial mechanics to the practical problems concerning the motion of rockets and other… …   Wikipedia

• Delta-v — For other uses, see Delta v (disambiguation). In astrodynamics a Δv or delta v (literally change in velocity ) is a scalar which takes units of speed. It is a measure of the amount of effort that is needed to change from one trajectory to another …   Wikipedia

• Orbital maneuver — In spaceflight, an orbital maneuver is the use of propulsion systems to change the orbit of a spacecraft. For spacecraft far from Earth for example those in orbits around the Sun an orbital maneuver is called a deep space maneuver (DSM).[not… …   Wikipedia

• Эффект Оберта — Эффект Оберта  в космонавтике  эффект, проявляющийся в том, что ракетный двигатель, движущийся с высокой скоростью, создает больше полезной энергии, чем такой же двигатель, движущийся медленно. Эффект Оберта вызывается тем, что при… …   Википедия

• Bi-elliptic transfer — In astronautics and aerospace engineering, the bi elliptic transfer is an orbital maneuver that moves a spacecraft from one orbit to another and may, in certain situations, require less delta v than a Hohmann transfer.The bi elliptic transfer… …   Wikipedia