Parade of horribles

Parade of horribles

A parade of horribles is both a literal parade and a rhetorical device.

As a literal parade

"Parade of horribles" originally referred to a literal parade of people wearing comic and grotesque costumes, rather like the Philadelphia Mummers Parade. It was a traditional feature of Fourth-of-July parades in parts of the U. S. in the nineteenth century, and "Horribles Parades" continue to be part of the Independence Day celebration in several New England communities. ["Horribles parades a weird tradition." "The Boston Globe", July 4, 1999] A 1926 newspaper article about July Fourth celebrations in the White Mountains of New Hampshire notes:Old-time celebrations are to be held tomorrow at Littleton, Lancaster, Colebrook, and Conway, with all the usual features of street parades of horribles and grotesques, brass bands, decorated automobiles and vehicles, exhibitions by fire departments, basket picnics in convenient groves... ["Mountain Season Early. Camp and Stream Bring Many Visitors to New Hampshire Despite Coolness." "The New York Times", July 4, 1926, p. X8]

As a rhetorical device

A parade of horribles is also a rhetorical device whereby the speaker argues against taking a certain course of action by listing a number of extremely undesirable events which will ostensibly result from the action. Its power lies in the emotional impact of the unpleasant predictions; however, a parade of horribles is a logical fallacy to the extent that:
*The "horribles" are not likely to occur as a result of the action, an appeal to probability,
*The argument relies solely on the emotional impact of the "horribles", an appeal to emotion, or
*The "horribles" are not actually bad.

A parade of horribles is a type of hyperbole because it exaggerates the negative results of the action. It is similar to a slippery slope argument, but not identical. Whereas a slippery slope argument argues that, "If we do this, then the next thing we do will be this," a parade of horribles argues that, "If we do this, then ultimately all these horrible things will happen."

Example

:"If homosexuals are allowed to marry each other, then all people in heterosexual marriages will get a divorce."

e also

* Misleading vividness

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • parade of horribles — noun a) A parade featuring a progression of people wearing comic and grotesque costumes. b) A rhetorical device employing a series of progressively more terrible results following from an act …   Wiktionary

  • Parade — This article is about a procession. For other uses, see Parade (disambiguation). A United States Marine Corps band on parade. A parade (also called march or marchpast) is a procession of people, usually organized along a street, often in costume …   Wikipedia

  • Bristol Fourth of July Parade — Crowded street scene prior to the Bristol Fourth of July Parade. The town s unique red, white, and blue center line is also visible. Bristol Fourth of July Parade (or Bristol Fourth of July Celebration), founded in 1785, is a nationally known… …   Wikipedia

  • antiques and horribles — noun plural : fantastic impersonations forming part of a parade …   Useful english dictionary

  • horrible — 1. noun /ˈhɔɹɪbl,ˈhɑɹɪbl/ a) A thing that causes horror; a terrifying thing, particularly a prospective bad consequence asserted as likely to result from an act. Heres a carcase. I know not all that may be coming, but be it what it will, Ill go… …   Wiktionary

  • Dred Scott v. Sandford — Scott v. Sandford Supreme Court of the United States Argued February 11–14, 1856 Reargued December 15 …   Wikipedia

  • Eye for an eye — The phrase an eye for an eye , (, ). Assuming the fulfillment of certain technical criteria (such as the sentencing of the accused whose punishment was not yet executed), wherever it is possible to punish the conspirators with the exact same… …   Wikipedia

  • Misleading vividness — is a term that can be applied to anecdotal evidence[1] describing an occurrence, even if it is an exceptional occurrence, with sufficient detail to permit hasty generalizations about the occurrence (e.g., to convince someone that the occurrence… …   Wikipedia

  • Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation ArgueDate=February 28 ArgueYear=2007 DecideDate=June 25 DecideYear=2007 FullName=Hein, Jay, et al. (Dir., White House Office of Faith Based and Community Initiatives) v. Freedom from… …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon v. Ice — Supreme Court of the United States Argued October 14, 2008 Decided January 14, 2009 …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”