Swift v. Tyson

Swift v. Tyson

SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Swift v. Tyson
ArgueDate=
ArgueYear=
DecideDate=January 25
DecideYear=1842
FullName=John Swift v. George W. Tyson
USVol=41
USPage=1
Citation=10 L. Ed. 865; 1842 U.S. LEXIS 345
Prior=On a certificate of division from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York
Subsequent=
Holding=Federal courts were to create and apply a federal common law in diversity cases.
SCOTUS=1842-1843
Majority=Story
JoinMajority="unanimous"
Concurrence=
JoinConcurrence=
Concurrence2=
JoinConcurrence2=
Concurrence/Dissent=Catron
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
Dissent=
JoinDissent=
Dissent2=
JoinDissent2=
LawsApplied=
Overruled="Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins", ussc|304|64|1938

"Swift v. Tyson", 41 U.S. 1 (1842)ref|citation, was a case in which the United States Supreme Court determined that United States federal courts hearing cases brought under their diversity jurisdiction must apply the "statutory" law of the states when the state's legislature had spoken on the issue but did not have to apply the state's common law. The Supreme Court's decision essentially said that federal courts, when deciding matters not specifically addressed by the state's legislature, had the authority to develop a federal common law.

This case has been criticized by some as an example of forum shopping because the facts of the case involved the quintessence of the need for a uniform nation wide rule, the handling of negotiable instruments—and the fact that most of the states have subscribed to the Uniform Commercial Code's Article 5 shows us that it did. The problem was that the "rule in "Swift" was extended by later judges to cover all of common law and not just that of commercial paper, bank notes, bankers acceptances and other forms of "near money."

This decision resulted in forum shopping, wherein plaintiffs would file their cases in federal as opposed to state courts in order to have a different law applied. This was seen to result in manipulation of the federal court system and was eventually overturned in "Erie Railroad v. Tompkins", 304 U.S. 64 (1938).

ee also

* List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 41

External links

* caselaw source
case="Swift v. Tyson", 41 U.S. 1 (1842)
enfacto=http://www.enfacto.com/case/U.S./41/1/
findlaw=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=41&page=1

* [http://www.agh-attorneys.com/4_swift_v_tyson.htm Modernized reading of the case]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Tyson — can refer to:People* Cathy Tyson, (1965 ), a British actress * Cicely Tyson, (1933 ), an American actress * Clay Tyson, Ian Tyson (1933 ), and Sylvia Tyson (1940 ), related Canadian musicians * Donald Tyson, (1954 ), a Canadian author of occult… …   Wikipedia

  • Swift & Company — Swift Company Unternehmensform Unternehmenssitz Greeley, Colorado Branche Nahrungsmittel, Agrar Website …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Tyson Foods — Inc. Rechtsform Corporation ISIN US9024941034 Gründung …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Swift & Company — Swift Company, the wholly owned operating subsidiary of privately held Fortune 500 listed S C Holdco 3, Inc. [http://www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.udWg.htm S C Holdco 3 Inc · 8 K · For 6/20/07] , SECInfo, Filed On 6/25/07, SEC File 333 100717 06,… …   Wikipedia

  • Swift & Company — Rechtsform Gründung 1855 Auflösung 12. Juli 2007 Auflösungsgrund Fusion mit JBS zu JBS Swift Group Sitz Greeley (Colorado) …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • JBS Swift Group — Rechtsform S.A. ISIN BRJBSSACNOR8 Gründung 1953 Sitz São Paulo, Brasilien …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • John W. Tyson — (189 1967) was the founder of the company that became corporate food giant Tyson Foods.In the early 1930 s, John Tyson knew he could make money by selling chickens outside Arkansas borders, so he began hauling birds to markets as far away as… …   Wikipedia

  • Erie doctrine — The Erie Doctrine provides that a federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction over a state law claim must apply state substantive common law in resolving the dispute. The Erie doctrine is a fundamental legal doctrine of civil procedure in the …   Wikipedia

  • Federal common law — is a term of United States law used to describe common law that is developed by the federal courts, instead of by the courts of the various states. The United States is the only country to combine the creation of common law doctrines with a… …   Wikipedia

  • Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins ArgueDate=January 31 ArgueYear=1938 DecideDate=April 25 DecideYear=1938 FullName=Erie Railroad Company v. Harry J. Tompkins USVol=304 USPage=64 Citation=58 S. Ct. 817; 82 L. Ed. 1188; 1938 U.S.… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”