Ingvar the Far-Travelled

Ingvar the Far-Travelled (Old Norse: "Yngvarr víðförli") was the leader of an unsuccessful Viking attack against Persia, in 1036–1042.

There were several Caspian expeditions of the Rus in the course of the 10th century. The "Yngvars saga víðförla" describes what was the last Viking campaign in the Caspian in 1041, adding much legend to the historical facts. This expedition was launched from Sweden by Ingvar the Far-Travelled, who went down the Volga River into the land of the Saracens (Serkland). While there, they apparently took part in the Georgian-Byzantine Battle of Sasireti.

There are no less than twenty-six Ingvar Runestones, twenty-four of them being in the Lake Mälaren region of Uppland in Sweden, referring to Swedish warriors who went out with Ingvar on his expedition to the Saracen lands, an expedition whose purpose was probably to reopen old trade routes, now that the Volga Bulgars and the Khazars no longer proved obstacles. A stone to Ingvar’s brother indicates that he went east for gold but that he died in Saracen land.Logan, Donald F. (1992). "The Vikings in History" 2nd ed., p. 202. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-08396-6]

ources

Beside the Ingvar Runestones, there are no extant Swedish sources that mention Ingvar, but there is "Yngvars saga víðförla" and three Icelandic annals that mention his death under the year 1041: "Annales regii", the "Lögmanns annáll" and the "Flateyarbók annals".Pritsak 1981:424] These three annals are probably based on Sturla Þórðarson's compilation.

Life

Origin

There are three theories on Ingvar's origin. According to one theory, prominently held by Otto von Friesen and Elena Mel'nikova, Ingvar's saga has transmitted his origin correctly, and so he was the son of the Varangian Eymundr, who in turn was the son of a Swedish chieftain named Áki and the daughter of the Swedish king Eric the Victorious.Pritsak 1981:425]

A second theory suggests that Ingvar was the son of a Swedish prince named Eymundr and who would have been the son of Eric the Victorious and the brother of Olof Skötkonung. The existence of this prince Eymundr has been suggested by Lauritz Weibull (1911) and J. Svennung (1966). The theory is based on a reevaluation of the age of the Ingvar runestones, proposed by Elias Wessén and Sune Lindquist and which suggests that the Ingvar Runestones were carved earlier in the 11th century.

According to a third theory, proposed by F. Braun, and which is based on the runestones and Ingvar, Ingvar the Far-Travelled.

Ingvar's origin was, however, debated as early as the saga writers, or to put it in the words of Oddr Snorrason::We do know that there are some saga tellers who say that Yngvarr was the son of [King] Önundr Óláfsson [d. 1060] , because they think that it would be more honorable for him to be a king's son. And [they say that] Önundr would gladly give up all his realm if he had been allowed to bargain for Yngvarr's life, because all the chiefs in Sweden would gladly have had him [Yngvarr] as king over them.Pritsak 1981:426ff]

Expedition

It is possible that it was King Anund Jakob or his brother and successor Emund the Old who mustered the Swedish leidang.

The participants were evenly distributed along the husbys, and 24 of the 26 Ingvar Runestones were from Sweden (in the contemporary sense, i.e. Svealand) and 2 from the Geatish district of Östergötland. The folkland of Attundaland did not take part and this was probably done on purpose in order to keep a defensive army in Sweden, while the main force was away.

Anund Jacob was the brother of Ingegerd Olofsdotter who was married to Yaroslav I of Novgorod and who conquered Kiev in 1019 from his brother Sviatopolk. This was done with the help of Varangians, and according to Ingvar's saga, they were led by Ingvar's father Eymund.

Later Yaroslav had trouble with the Pechenegs, a nomad tribe. The expedition stayed for a few years in Kiev fighting against the Pechenegs, then (in 1042) they continued to the Black Sea and the Christian country, called Särkland (Georgia).

Aftermath

According to the legendary saga about Ingvar, only one ship returned. The 26 remaining rune stones testify to this as no one mentions a surviving participant. The most common phrases are similar to the one on the Gripsholm Runestone:

Adam of Bremen considered the disaster to be a punishment for the king's rejection of bishop Adalvard of Bremen and his electing his own bishop, Osmundus.

References

* Mats G. Larsson (1990). "Ett ödesdigert vikingatåg] . Ingvar den vittfarnes resa 1036–1041"'
*Pritsak, Omeljan. (1981). "The origin of Rus'". Cambridge, Mass.: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute. ISBN 0-674-64465-4
* Peter Tunstall (2005). " [http://www.oe.eclipse.co.uk/nom/Yngvar.htm The Saga of Yngvar the Traveller] ".