Killing Time (Paul Feyerabend book)

Infobox Book
name = Killing Time
title_orig =
translator =


image_caption =
author = Paul Feyerabend
illustrator =
cover_artist =
country =
language = English
series =
subject =
genre = Autobiography
publisher = University of Chicago Press
pub_date = 1994
english_pub_date = July 5 1995
media_type = Print (Hardcover)
pages = 203
isbn = ISBN 0226245314
oclc = 185633935
preceded_by = Three Dialogues on Knowledge
followed_by = Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being

"Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend" is an autobiography by philosopher Paul Feyerabend. The book details, amongst other things, Feyerabend's youth in Nazi-controlled Vienna, his military service, notorious academic career, and vigorous sex life.

Feyerabend barely managed to finish writing the book, lying in a hospital bed in with an inoperable brain tumor and the left side of his body paralyzed, and he died shortly before it was released.cite book | last = Preston | first = John | title = The Worst Enemy of Science? | publisher = Oxford University Press | location = Oxford Oxfordshire | year = 2000 | isbn = 0195128745 ] Zussman, Robert, " [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0094-3061%28199603%2925%3A2%3C143%3AAO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R Autobiographical Occasions] ", "Contemporary Sociology", Vol. 25, No. 2. (Mar., 1996), pp. 143-148.] "Killing Time" was first published in Italian in 1994, with an English translation following the year afterward.

Summary

Feyerabend discloses that he did not keep any careful records of his life and destroyed much of the documentation autobiographers usually preserve, including a family album discarded "to make room for what I then thought were more important books", and correspondences ("even from Nobel Prize winners"). The book relies on Feyerabends's own memory as well as the various stray sources that he did manage to keep. His personal and intellectual experiences and his romantic and artistic adventures comprise roughly half the book. He recounts how he survived the depressions and suicide of his mother, his bare survival of World War II as an officer in the Wehrmacht, [van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. "Attachment, Emergent Morality, and Aggression: Toward a Developmental Socioemotional Model of Antisocial Behaviour". "International Journal of Behavioral Development" 1997; 21; 703. doi|10.1080/016502597384631] and his forgone apprenticeship as a tenor to Bertolt Brecht. His stormy relationships with philosophical luminaries such as mentor Karl Popper, friend and colleague Imre Lakatos and department chair of philosophy at University of California, Berkeley John Searle are described in lurid anecdotes. The book contains ruminations on the themes of evil, compassion and anti-Semitism.

Reception

The book was well received overall, earning largely favorable reviews in the "British Journal for the Philosophy of Science", "Nature" (by Peter Lipton), "The New Republic" (by Richard Rorty) and "New Scientist". [cite web
url=http://www.complete-review.com/reviews/feyerpk/killtime.htm
title=Killing Time - Paul Feyerabend
publisher=Complete-review.com
accessdate=2008-02-23] Friend and student of Feyerabend Sheldon J. Reaven hailed the autobiography as "delightful" and "revealing",cite book | last = Reaven | first = Sheldon J. | title = The Worst Enemy of Science? | publisher = Oxford University Press | location = Oxford Oxfordshire | chapter = Time Well Spent |year = 2000 | isbn = 0195128745 ] while a reviewer in "Contemporary Sociology" found the book "by turns charming and infuriating". Prolific reviewer Danny Yee called it "an engaging autobiography of an intriguing individual who lead an eventful life", and claimed that the book could be appreciated by readers uninterested in philosophy of science or who had never heard of Feyerabend. [cite web
url=http://dannyreviews.com/h/Killing_Time.html
title=Killing Time (Paul Feyerabend) - book review
publisher=Danny Yee's Book Reviews
accessdate=2008-02-23
last=Yee
first=Danny
authorlink=Danny Yee
date=1995-08-11] "Kirkus Reviews" described it as "a fascinating memoir with an ending that will change many people's opinion about the Peck's bad boy of philosophy". ["The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science", 47 (1996), 669.] The "New York Times Book Review" gave the article an "A-" grade, with reviewer Nancy Maull commenting that "There is much to admire and much to frustrate admiration in the account. But in his instructive, stubborn and unbending refusal to be dazzled by theory, [Feyerabend] still has no rival." [Maull, Nancy, "The New York Times Book Review" (1995-05-28).]

Citations