Unaccusative verb

Unaccusative verb

In linguistics, an unaccusative verb is an intransitive verb whose (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent; that is, it does not actively initiate, or is not actively responsible for, the action of the verb. Unaccusative verbs thus contrast with unergative verbs. An unaccusative verb's subject is semantically similar to the direct object of a transitive verb, or to the subject of a verb in the passive voice. English unaccusative verbs include "arrive", "die", and "fall", but not "run" or "resign", which are unergative.

The term "unaccusative" is applied primarily to nominative-accusative languages, where the accusative case, which marks the direct object of a transitive verb, typically marks the non-volitional role. Unaccusative verbs are so called because their non-volitional arguments do not take the accusative case.

Deriving unaccusativity

The derivation of the core properties of unaccusative constructions from a set of principles is one of the topmost issues of the agenda of modern syntax since the seminal work by Perlmutter 1978 (cf. Burzio 1986 and Hale-Keyser 2003 for landmark proposals). More specifically, the first approach arrived at an important consequence constituting an analogy between English passive voice constructions and unaccusative constructions whereas in the second approach a more radical theory was proposed based on the analysis of expletive "there" stemming from the sentences with the copula suggested in Moro 1997.

Tests for unaccusativity

As mentioned above, the unaccusative/unergative split in intransitive verbs can be characterized semantically. Unaccusative verbs tend to express a telic and dynamic change of state or location, while unergative verbs tend to express an agentive activity (not involving directed movement). While these properties define the "core" classes of unaccusatives and unergatives, there are intermediate classes of verbs whose status is less clear (for example, verbs of existence, appearance, or continuation, verbs denoting uncontrolled processes, or motion verbs).

A number of syntactic criteria for unaccusativity have also been identified. The most well-known test is auxiliary selection in languages that use two different temporal auxiliaries ("have" and "be") for analytic past/perfect verb forms (e.g. German, Dutch, French, Italian). In these languages, unaccusative verbs combine with "be", while unergative verbs combine with "have".

:French::unaccusative: "Je suis tombé." lit. "I am fallen." (= "I have fallen."):unergative: "J'ai travaillé." "I have worked."

:Italian::unaccusative: "Lui è arrivato." lit. "He is arrived." (= "He has arrived."):unergative: "Lui ha telefonato." "He has phoned."

From one language to another, however, synonymous verbs do not always select the same auxiliary, and even within one language, a single verb may combine with either auxiliary (either depending on the meaning/context, or with no observable semantic motivation, sometimes depending on regional variation of the language ). The auxiliary selection criterion therefore also identifies core classes of unaccusative and unergatives (which show the least variation within and across languages) and more peripheral classes (where variation and context effects are observed).

Other tests that have been studied involve passivization (see Impersonal passive voice), "ne"/"en" cliticization in Italian and French, and impersonal, participial, and resultative constructions in a wide range of languages. In Japanese, the grammaticality of sentences that appear to violate syntactic rules may signal the presence of an unaccusative verb. Such sentences contain a trace located in the direct object position that helps to satisfy the mutual c-command condition between numeral quantifiers and the noun phrases they modify (Tsujimura, 2007).

Unaccusativity in English

Modern English only uses one perfect auxiliary ("have"), although archaic examples like "He is fallen/come" reflect the use of "be" with unaccusative verbs in earlier stages of the language.

The identification of unaccusative verbs in English is based on other criteria. For example, many unaccusatives alternate with a corresponding transitive construction where the unaccusative subject appears in direct object position:

*The ice melted. ≈ The sun melted the ice.
*The window broke. ≈ The golf ball broke the window.

Unaccusative past participles can be used as nominal modifiers with active meaning, while unergative past participles cannot:

*unaccusative: the melted snow, the departed guests, the fallen soldiers
*unergative: *the shouted victim, *the slept child, *the hesitated leader

Finally, unaccusative subjects can generally be modified by a resultative adjunct. This is a property shared by direct objects and passive subjects, but not shared by the subjects of unergative and transitive verbs.

*unaccusative subject: The vase broke into pieces.
*direct object: John broke the vase into pieces.
*passive subject: The vase was broken into pieces.
*unergative subject: *John dined full/to death/two pounds heavier.
*subject of transitive verb: *John ate the brownies full/to death/two pounds heavier.

References

* [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=unaccusative+verb Lexicon of Linguistics] (Utrecht institute of Linguistics)
*cite book |last=Burzio |first=Luigi |title=Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach |year=1986 |publisher=Reidel |location=Dordrecht
*Everaert, M. - van Riemsdijk, H - Goedemans, R. (eds) 2006 The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volumes I-V, Blackwell, London: see "copular sentences" and "existential sentences and expletive there" in Volume II
*Hale, K. - Keyser, J. (2002) "Prolegomena to a theory of argument structure", Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, 39, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
*cite book |last=Levin |first=Beth |coauthors=Malka Rappaport-Hovav |title=Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Semantics Interface |year=1994 |publisher=MIT Press |location=Cambridge, MA
*Moro, A. 1997 "The raising of predicates. Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure", Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
*cite conference |last=Perlmutter |first=David M. |title=Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis |booktitle=Proc. of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society |pages=157–189 |publisher=UC Berkeley |date=1978
*cite journal |last=Sorace |first=Antonella |year=2000 |title=Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs |journal=Language |volume=76 |pages=859–890 |doi=10.2307/417202
*cite book |last=Tsujimura |first=Natsuko |title=An introduction to Japanese linguistics (second edition) |year=2007 |publisher=Blackwell |location=Malden, MA

ee also

*Accusative verb
*Ambitransitive verb
*Anticausative verb
*Copula
*Deponent verb
*Ergative verb
*Impersonal passive voice
*Reflexive verb
*Unergative verb


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • unaccusative — 1. adjective /ˌʌnəˈkjuːzətɪv/ Intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent. Ant: unergative, transitive …   Wiktionary

  • Verb — This article is about the part of speech. For the physical activity program, see VERB (program). For English usage of verbs, see English verbs. Verbs redirects here. For the Christian gospel rapper, see Verbs (rapper). Examples I washed the car… …   Wikipedia

  • Unergative verb — An unergative verb is an intransitive verb distinguished semantically by having an agent subject. For example, in English, run , talk and resign are unergative verbs (while fall and die are unaccusative).The motivation behind the label unergative …   Wikipedia

  • Deponent verb — In linguistics, a deponent verb is a verb that is active in meaning but takes its form from a different voice, most commonly the middle or passive. A deponent verb doesn t have active forms; it can be said to have deposited them (into oblivion).… …   Wikipedia

  • Anticausative verb — An anticausative verb is an intransitive verb that shows an event affecting its subject, while giving no semantic or syntactic indication of the cause of the event. The single argument of the anticausative verb (its subject) is a patient, that is …   Wikipedia

  • Ergative verb — In linguistics, an ergative verb is a verb that can be either transitive or intransitive, and whose subject when intransitive corresponds to its direct object when transitive.In EnglishIn English, most verbs can be used intransitively, but… …   Wikipedia

  • Ambitransitive verb — An ambitransitive verb is a verb that can be used both as intransitive or as transitive without requiring a morphological change. That is, the same verb form may or may not require a direct object. English has a large number of ambitransitive… …   Wikipedia

  • Accusative verb — An accusative verb is a verb that can be used transitively or intransitively, with the subject of the transitive verb becoming the argument of the intransitive verb. Some examples in English are murder , see , love .ee also*Unaccusative verb… …   Wikipedia

  • Auxiliary verb — In linguistics, an auxiliary verb is a verb that gives further semantic or syntactic information about a main or full verb. In English, the extra meaning provided by an auxiliary verb alters the basic meaning of the main verb to make it have one… …   Wikipedia

  • Compound verb — In linguistics, a compound verb or complex predicate is a multi word compound that acts as a single verb. One component of the compound is a light verb or vector, which carries any inflections, indicating tense, mood, or aspect, but provides only …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”