Judicial tyranny

Judicial tyranny

The term Judicial tyranny is also political epithet often used to describe the actions of unelected judges whose rulings unlawfully validate or invalidate the policy decisions made by elected officials, unlawfully sustain or overrule enacted statutes or court precedents, or violate a constitution. Some political rhetoric imprecisely uses the phrase synonymously with judicial activism, but the terms have had different meaning. In debates today, howeever, their meanings are often conflated, especially in conservative circles. The phrase is generally traced back to a comment in a letter by Thomas Jefferson, referring to the "despotism" of Federalist federal judges (in particular, John Marshall) who continued to hold office as their political party was fading away.

Judicial tyranny, as used today in conservative circles, represents a form of judicial interpretation which results in case law which does not follow precedent or which exceeds the scope of established law, and can be contrasted with judicial restraint. The extent to which the decisions of judges are sometimes characterised as "tyrannical" has led to ongoing controversy over the appropriate role and function of the judiciary, notably in the United States, Australia and Canada.

Conservative opponents of judicial tyranny contend that the judiciary must not create new law when resolving disputes or interpreting the law. They argue that the law-making role is strictly the preserve of the legislature, and that when judges venture into this role, they make rulings on the basis of personal convictions or some other inappropriate ground.

Many liberal activists do not agree that judicial tyranny, as the term is used by conservatives, exists today, but may regard other practices of judges as judicial tyranny. Those of a more liberal bent argue that the role of the judiciary under the doctrine of the separation of powers will sometimes necessarily result in decisions which go beyond established law, and that this serves as a useful and desirable safeguard against majoritarianism. They also question the opprobrium associated with the term, seeing it as an example of loaded language which contains the unstated and uncritical assumption that the judiciary must never create new law when interpreting it.

Libertarian critics who use the term generally focus on decisions that sustain what they consider usurped powers of government, and applaud decisions that sustain rights of individuals against the actions of officials. Their usage is similar to that of constitutionalist or originalist critics who find judges deviating from compliance with a state or federal constitution as originally understood, based on historical evidence.


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Judicial activism — is a pejorative term for the misuse of judicial power and is a neologism for the older classical term board judicial review . The most common connotation is subjective, in which the speaker condemns judicial decisions that, in the view of the… …   Wikipedia

  • Tyranny (disambiguation) — A tyranny is a despotically ruled state or society.Tyranny may also refer to: * Tyrant, a despotic ruler or person * Personal Rule, Charles I s disregard of parliament also known as the Eleven Years Tyranny * Tyranny of the majority, a theory of… …   Wikipedia

  • Judicial functions of the House of Lords — This article is part of the series: Courts of England and Wales Law of England and Wales …   Wikipedia

  • Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 — The Hughes Court, 1932–1937. Front row: Justices Brandeis and Van Devanter, Chief Justice Hughes, and Justices McReynolds and Sutherland. Back row: Justices Roberts, Butler, Stone, and Cardozo …   Wikipedia

  • tyranny — noun ADJECTIVE ▪ petty ▪ brutal ▪ judicial (esp. AmE), political, religious VERB + TYRANNY ▪ be free of …   Collocations dictionary

  • judicial — adj. Judicial is used with these nouns: ↑appointment, ↑approval, ↑authority, ↑branch, ↑capacity, ↑commission, ↑confirmation, ↑decree, ↑discretion, ↑district, ↑election, ↑ …   Collocations dictionary

  • Roy Moore — Infobox Judge|name= Roy Stewart Moore office=Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court termstart= January 15, 2001 imagesize= 150px termend= November 13, 2003 predecessor=Perry O. Hooper, Sr. successor=Drayton Nabers, Jr. office2 = Circuit Judge …   Wikipedia

  • Supreme Court of the United States — Infobox High Court|court name = Supreme Court of the United States imagesize = 150px caption = established = 1789 country = United States location = Washington, D.C. coordinates= coord|38|53|26.55|N|77|00|15.64|W|display=inline,title type =… …   Wikipedia

  • List of politics topics — NOTOC TopicTOC Politics This is a list of political topics, including political science terms, political philosophies, political issues, etc. Politics is the process by which groups of people make decisions. Although the term is generally applied …   Wikipedia

  • Universal jurisdiction — or universality principle is a controversial principle in international law whereby states claim criminal jurisdiction over persons whose alleged crimes were committed outside the boundaries of the prosecuting state, regardless of nationality,… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”