Carmichael v. National Power plc

Carmichael v. National Power plc

"Carmichael v. National Power plc" [1999] 1 WLR 2042; [1999] I.C.R. 1226 is a British labour law case on the contract of employment for the purpose of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Facts

Tour guides had complained that they got no written statement of the employment contracts under s.1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. They worked at Blyth Power Stations in Northumberland, for the Central Electricity Generating Board. Their hiring contracts said ‘I am pleased to note that you are agreeable to be employed by the C.E.G.B. at Blyth ‘A’ and ‘B’ power stations on a casual as required basis as a station guide.’

Judgment

The House of Lords decided that they were not employees for the purpose of s.1, because there was not sufficient 'mutuality of obligation' when the guides were not actually guiding. Lord Irvine of Lairg said that there would not have been an ‘irreducible minimum of mutuality of obligation necessary to create a contract of service’ (following "Nethermere") between the times actually working (while working the situation would be different). Their claim failed on the basis that on many occasions they would be called up but say they could not work. [ [1999] 1 WLR 2042, 2047]

Lord Hoffmann stated, at 1233, "…the terms of the contract are a question of fact. And of course the question of whether the parties intended a document or documents to be the exclusive record of the terms of their agreement is also a question of fact." [ [1999] I.C.R. 1226, 1233] "The evidence of a party as to what terms he understood to have been agree is some evidence tending to show that those terms, in an objective sense, were agreed. Of course the tribunal may reject such evidence and conclude that the party misunderstood the effect of what was being said and done. But when both parties are agreed about what they understood their mutual obligations (or lack of them) to be, it is a strong thing to exclude their evidence from consideration." [ [1999] I.C.R. 1226, 1235]

ee also

*British labour law

Notes

External links

*Text of the full judgment, [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd991118/car.htm 18 November 1999]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Muscat v Cable & Wireless Plc — Cable Wireless plc v Muscat Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [2006] EWCA Civ 220, [2006] ICR 975 …   Wikipedia

  • O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [1983] ICR 728 Keywords Employment cont …   Wikipedia

  • O'Kelly v. Trusthouse Forte plc — [1983] ICR 728 is a notorious UK labour law case, which held that a requirement for a contract is mutuality of obligation between the parties.FactsSome waiters were hired through an employment agency to do dinner functions. They were called up… …   Wikipedia

  • Nethermere (St. Neots) Ltd. v. Gardiner — And Another [1984] ICR 612 is a British labour law case in the Court of Appeal in the field of home work and vulnerable workers. Many labour and employment rights, such as unfair dismissal [s.94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996] , in Britain… …   Wikipedia

  • Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [1984] ICR 612 Case history Prior action(s) …   Wikipedia

  • Employment contract in English law — An employment contract in English law is a specific kind of contract whereby one person performs work under the direction of another. The two main features of a contract is that work is exchanged for a wage, and that one party stands in a… …   Wikipedia

  • United Kingdom agency worker law — refers to the law which regulates people s work through employment agencies in the United Kingdom. Though statistics are disputed, there are currently between half a million and one and a half million agency workers in the UK, and probably over… …   Wikipedia

  • Muschett v H M Prison Service — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [2010] EWCA Civ 25 Case opinions Rimer LJ Keywords …   Wikipedia

  • Market Investigations Ltd v Minister for Social Security — Court Court of Appeal Citation(s) [1969] 2 QB 173 Keywords Contract of employment Market Investigations Ltd v Minister for Social Security [1969] 2 QB 173 is a UK labour law case concerning the scope of protection for people to employment rights …   Wikipedia

  • Employment Rights Act 1996 — Infobox UK Legislation short title=Employment Rights Act 1996 parliament=Parliament of the United Kingdom long title=... statute book chapter=1996 c. 18 introduced by= territorial extent=England and Wales; Scotland; Northern Ireland royal assent …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”