Joseph Schumpeter

Infobox_Scientist
name = Joseph Schumpeter


caption = Joseph Schumpeter
birth_date = birth date|1883|2|8|mf=y
birth_place = Triesch, Moravia, Austria-Hungary
death_date = death date and age|1950|1|8|1883|2|8|mf=y
death_place = Taconic, Connecticut, U.S.
nationality =
field = Economics
work_institution = Harvard University 1932-50 University of Bonn 1925-32 Biedermann Bank 1921-24 University of Graz 1912-14 University of Czernowitz 1909-11
alma_mater = University of Vienna
doctoral_advisor = Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk
doctoral_students = James Tobin John Burr Williams Mentored: Abram Bergson Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen Robert Heilbroner
known_for = Business cycles Economic development Entrepreneurship Evolutionary economics
prizes =

Joseph Alois Schumpeter (February 8, 1883 – January 8, 1950) [ [http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Schumpeter.html Joseph Alois Schumpeter: Biography] ] was an economist and political scientist born in Moravia in present-day Czech Republic.

Life

Born in Triesch, Moravia (then part of Austria-Hungary, now Třešť in the Czech Republic), Schumpeter was a brilliant student praised by his teachers. He began his career studying law at the University of Vienna under the Austrian capital theorist Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, taking his PhD in 1906. In 1909, after some study trips, he became a professor of economics and government at the University of Czernowitz. In 1911 he joined the University of Graz, where he remained until World War I. In 1919-1920, he served as the Austrian Minister of Finance, with some success, and in 1920-1924, as President of the private Biederman Bank. That bank, as great part of that regional economy, collapsed in 1924 leaving Schumpeter bankrupt.

From 1925-1932, he held a chair at the University of Bonn, Germany. With the rise of Nazism in central Europe, he moved to Harvard where he had lectured in 1927-1928 and 1930. He would teach there from 1932 until his death in 1950. During his Harvard years he was not generally considered a good classroom teacher, but he acquired a school of loyal followers. His prestige among colleagues was likewise not very high because his views seemed outdated and not in synch with the then-fashionable Keynesianism. This period of his life was characterized by hard work but little recognition of his core ideas.

Although Schumpeter encouraged some young mathematical economists and was even the president of the Econometric Society (1940-41), Schumpeter was not a mathematician but rather an economist and tried instead to integrate sociological understanding into his economic theories. From current thought it has been argued that Schumpeter's ideas on business cycles and economic development could not be captured in the mathematics of his day - they need the language of non-linear dynamical systems to be partially formalized.

Most important work

The history of economic analysis

Schumpeter's vast erudition is apparent in his posthumous "History of Economic Analysis", although some of his judgments seem quite idiosyncratic and sometimes cavalier. For instance, Schumpeter thought that the greatest 18th century economist was Turgot, not Adam Smith, as many consider, and he considered Léon Walras to be the "greatest of all economists", besides whom other economists' theories were "like inadequate attempts to catch some particular aspects of Walrasian truth." [http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/essays/margrev/phases.htm#aftermath] . Schumpeter criticized John Maynard Keynes and David Ricardo for the "Ricardian vice." According to Schumpeter, Ricardo and Keynes reasoned in terms of abstract models, where they would freeze all but a few variables. Then they could argue that one caused the other in a simple monotonic fashion. This led to the belief that one could easily deduce policy conclusions directly from a highly abstract theoretical model.

Business cycles

Schumpeter's relationships with the ideas of other economists were quite complex in his most important contributions toeconomic analysis - the theory of business cycles and development. Following neither Walras nor Keynes, Schumpeter starts in "The Theory of Economic Development [Schumpeter, J.A. "The theory of economic development : an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle / translated from the German by Redvers Opie" (1961) New York: OUP] " with a treatise of circular flow which, excluding any innovations and innovative activities, leads to a stationary state. The stationary state is, according to Schumpeter, described by Walrasian equilibrium. The hero of his story, though, is, in fine Austrian fashion, the entrepreneur.

The entrepreneur disturbs this equilibrium and is the prime cause of economic development, which proceeds in cyclic fashion along several time scales. In fashioning this theory connecting innovations, cycles, and development, Schumpeter kept alive the Russian Nikolai Kondratiev's ideas on 50-year cycles, Kondratiev waves.

Schumpeter suggested a model in which the four main cycles, Kondratiev (54 years), Kuznets (18 years), Juglar (9 years) and Kitchin (about 4 years) can be added together to form a composite waveform. (Actually there was considerable professional rivalry between Schumpeter and Kuznets. The wave form suggested here did not include the Kuznets Cycle simply because Schumpeter did not recognize it as a valid cycle. See "Business Cycle" for confirmation.) A Kondratiev wave could consist of three lower degree Kuznets waves. Each Kuznets wave could, itself, be made up of two Juglar waves. Similarly two (or three) Kitchin waves could form a higher degree Juglar wave. If each of these were in phase, more importantly if the downward arc of each was simultaneous so that the nadir of each was coincident it would explain disastrous slumps and consequent depressions. (as far as the segmentation of the Kondratyev Wave, Schumpeter never proposed such a fixed model. He saw these cycles varying in time - although in a tight time frame by coincidence - and for each to serve a specific purpose)

chumpeter and Keynesianism

In Schumpeter's theory, Walrasian equilibrium is not adequate to capture the key mechanisms of economic development. Schumpeter also thought that the institution enabling the entrepreneur to purchase the resources needed to realize his or her vision was a well-developed capitalist financial system, including a whole range of institutions for granting credit. One could divide economists among (1) those who emphasized "real" analysis and regarded money as merely a "veil" and (2) those who thought monetary institutions are important and money could be a separate driving force. Both Schumpeter and Keynes were among the latter. Nevertheless, Schumpeter, who was a classical liberal, rejected Keynesianism.

chumpeter and capitalism's demise

Schumpeter's most popular book in English is probably "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy". This book opens with a treatment of Karl Marx. On the surface level, this piece seems to support socialism. Schumpeter's reasoning was that an overt defense of capitalism would prompt the book only to be read by those who already supported capitalism. Therefore, he believed that he must masquerade as a supporter of socialism to entice the young socialist to read his work. In the end, he hoped to awaken self-recognition in the reader to the flaws of socialism. [Muller, Jerry Z. The Mind and the Market. Anchor Books, New York. 2003.] While he is sympathetic to Marx's theory that capitalism will collapse and will be replaced by socialism, Schumpeter concludes that this will not come about in the way Marx predicted. To describe it he borrowed the phrase "creative destruction," and made it famous by using it to describe a process in which the old ways of doing things are endogenously destroyed and replaced by new ways.

Schumpeter's theory is that the success of capitalism will lead to a form of corporatism and a fostering of values hostile to capitalism, especially among intellectuals. The intellectual and social climate needed to allow entrepreneurship to thrive will not exist in advanced capitalism; it will be replaced by socialism in some form. There will not be a revolution, but merely a trend in parliaments to elect social democratic parties of one stripe or another. He argued that capitalism's collapse from within will come about as democratic majorities vote for the creation of a welfare state and place restrictions upon entrepreneurship that will burden and destroy the capitalist structure. Schumpeter emphasizes throughout this book that he is analyzing trends, not engaging in political advocacy. In his vision, the intellectual class will play an important role in capitalism's demise. The term "intellectuals" denotes a class of persons in a position to develop critiques of societal matters for which they are not directly responsible and able to stand up for the interests of strata to which they themselves do not belong. One of the great advantages of capitalism, he argues, is that as compared with pre-capitalist periods, when education was a privilege of the few, more and more people acquire (higher) education. The availabiliy of fulfulling work is however limited and this, coupled with the experience of unemployment, produces discontent. The intellectual class is then able to organise protest and develop critical ideas.

In Schumpeter's view, socialism will ensure that the production of goods and services is directed towards meeting the authentic needs of people and will overcome some innate tendencies of capitalism such as conjecture fluctuation, unemployment and waning acceptance of the system. [It is interesting to note, that Schumpeter's theories of the transition of capitalism into socialism has – according to some analysts – been ‘nearly right’ in some cases: "Where Schumpeter was Nearly Right - The Swedish Model and Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" by Magnus Henrekson, Ulf Jakobsson. Available at http://swopec.hhs.se/iuiwop/papers/iuiwop0533.pdf]

chumpeter and democratic theory

In the same book, Schumpeter expounded a theory of democracy which sought to challenge what he called the 'classical doctrine'. He disputed the idea that democracy was a process by which the electorate identified the common good, and politicians carried this out for them. He argued this was unrealistic, and that people's ignorance and superficiality meant that in fact they were largely manipulated by politicians, who set the agenda. This made a 'rule by the people' concept both unlikely and undesirable. Instead he advocated a minimalist model, much influenced by Max Weber, whereby democracy is the mechanism for competition between leaders, much like a market structure. Although periodical votes from the general public legitimize governments and keep them accountable, the policy program is very much seen as their own and not that of the people, and the participatory role for individuals is severely limited."

Schumpeter and entrepreneurship

The concept of entrepreneurship cannot be fully understood without his contributions, being probably the first scholar to develop its theories.He gave two theories, sometimes called Mark I and Mark II. In the first one, the early one, Schumpeter argued that the innovation and technological change of a nation comes from the entrepreneurs, or wild spirits. He coined the word "Unternehmergeist", German for "entrepreneur-spirit". He believed that these individuals are the ones who make things work in the economy of the country. In Mark II, developed later as professor at Harvard, he asserted that the actors that drive innovation and the economy are big companies which have the resources and capital to invest in research and development. Both arguments might be complementary today.

The English literature uses the term entrepreneurship, from the French "enterprise". When studying entrepreneurship and Schumpeter, it is helpful to keep in mind he used the German term (Unternehmergeist), acknowledging this "fiery souls" or "spirits".

His legacy

For some time after his death, Schumpeter's views were most influential among various heterodox economists, especially European, who were interested in industrial organization, evolutionary theory, and economic development, and who tended to be on the other end of the political spectrum from Schumpeter and were also often influenced by Keynes, Karl Marx, and Thorstein Veblen. Robert Heilbroner was one of Schumpeter's most renowned pupils, who wrote extensively about him in "The Worldly Philosophers". Other outstanding students of Schumpeter's include the economist Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and former chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan ["I've watched the process [creative destruction] at work through my entire career," p. 48, Greenspan, Alan "The Age of Turbulance : Adventures in a New World" (2007) New York: Penguin Press] . Robert Solow, Nobel Prize in Economics, was his student at Harvard, and he expanded on Schumpeter's theory [http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2007/05/robert_solow_on.html] .

Today, Schumpeter has a following outside of standard textbook economics, in areas such as in economic policy, management studies, industrial policy, and the study of innovation. Schumpeter was probably the first scholar to develop theories about entrepreneurship. For instance, the European Union's innovation program, and its main development plan, the Lisbon Strategy, are influenced by Schumpeter.

Major Works

*"Über die mathematische Methode der theoretischen Ökonomie", 1906, "ZfVSV".
*"Das Rentenprinzip in der Verteilungslehre", 1907, "Schmollers Jahrbuch"
*"Wesen und Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie" (transl. "The Nature and Essence of Theoretical Economics"), 1908.
*"On the Concept of Social Value", 1909, "QJE"
*"Wie studiert man Sozialwissenschaft", 1910 (transl. by J.Z. Muller, "How to Study Social Science", "Society", 2003)
*"Marie Esprit Leon Walras", 1910, "ZfVSV".
*"Über das Wesen der Wirtschaftskrisen", 1910, "ZfVSV"
*"Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung" (transl. "The Theory of Economic Development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle") , 1911.
*"Economic Doctrine and Method: An historical sketch", 1914.
*"Das wissenschaftliche Lebenswerk Eugen von Böhm-Bawerks", 1914, "ZfVSV".
*"Vergangenkeit und Zukunft der Sozialwissenschaft", 1915.
*"The Crisis of the Tax State", 1918.
*"The Sociology of Imperialism", 1919, "Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik"
*"Max Weber's Work", 1920, "Der österreichische Volkswirt"
*"Carl Menger", 1921, "ZfVS".
*"The Explanation of the Business Cycle", 1927, "Economica"
*"Social Classes in an Ethnically Homogeneous Environment", 1927, "Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik".
*"The Instability of Capitalism", 1928, "EJ"
*"Das deutsche Finanzproblem", 1928.
*"Mitchell's Business Cycles", 1930, "QJE"
*"The Present World Depression: A tentative diagnosis", 1931, "AER".
*"The Common Sense of Econometrics", 1933, "Econometrica"
*"Depressions: Can we learn from past experience?", 1934, in "Economics of the Recovery Program"
*"The Nature and Necessity of a Price System", 1934, "Economic Reconstruction".
*"Review of Robinson's "Economics of Imperfect Competition", 1934, "JPE"
*"The Analysis of Economic Change", 1935, "REStat".
*"Professor Taussig on Wages and Capital", 1936, "Explorations in Economics".
*"Review of Keynes's "General Theory", 1936, "JASA"
*"Business Cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the Capitalist process", 1939.
*"The Influence of Protective Tariffs on the Industrial Development of the United States", 1940, "Proceedings of AAPS"
*"Alfred Marshall's "Principles": A semi-centennial appraisal", 1941, "AER".
*"Frank William Taussig", 1941, "QJE".
*"Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy", 1942.
*"Capitalism in the Postwar World", 1943, "Postwar Economic Problems".
*"John Maynard Keynes", 1946, "AER".
*"The Future of Private Enterprise in the Face of Modern Socialistic Tendencies", 1946, "Comment sauvegarder l'entreprise privée"
*"Rudimentary Mathematics for Economists and Statisticians", with W.L.Crum, 1946.
*"Capitalism", 1946, "Encyclopaedia Britannica".
*"The Decade of the Twenties", 1946, "AER"
*"The Creative Response in Economic History", 1947, "JEH"
*"Theoretical Problems of Economic Growth", 1947, "JEH"
*"Irving Fisher's Econometrics", 1948, "Econometrica".
*"There is Still Time to Stop Inflation", 1948, "Nation's Business".
*"Science and Ideology", 1949, "AER".
*"Vilfredo Pareto", 1949, "QJE".
*"Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History", 1949, "Change and the Entrepreneur"
*"The "Communist Manifesto" in Sociology and Economics", 1949, "JPE"
*"English Economists and the State-Managed Economy", 1949, "JPE"
*"The Historical Approach to the Analysis of Business Cycles", 1949, "NBER Conference on Business Cycle Research".
*"Wesley Clair Mitchell", 1950, "QJE".
*"March into Socialism", 1950, "AER".
*"Ten Great Economists: From Marx to Keynes", 1951.
*"Imperialism and Social Classes", 1951 (reprints of 1919, 1927)
*"Essays on Economic Topics", 1951.
*"Review of the Troops", 1951, "QJE".
*"History of Economic Analysis", (published posthumously, ed. Elisabeth Boody Schumpeter), 1954.
*"American Institutions and Economic Progress", 1983, "Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatswissenschaft"
*"The Meaning of Rationality in the Social Sciences", 1984, "Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatswissenschaft"
*"Money and Currency", 1991, "Social Research".
*"Economics and Sociology of Capitalism", 1991.

ee also

*List of Austrians
*List of Austrian scientists
*Social innovation
*Creative destruction
*Innovation
*Austrian School of economics (Schumpeter was not part of this movement)

Notes

References

* Cheung, Edward [http://www.longwavepress.com/baby_boomers_generation_x_1.htm "Baby Boomers, Generation X and Social Cycles"] "The latest findings on Schumpeter's Creative Destruction."
* Harris, S. E. (ed.), 1951. "Schumpeter: Social Scientist". Harvard University Press.
* Robbins, L. C., 1955, "Schumpeter's History of Economic Analysis," "Quarterly Journal of Economics 69": 1-22.
* Muller, Jerry Z., 2002. "The Mind and the Market: Capitalism in Western Thought". Anchor Books.
* Groenewegen, Peter, 2003. "Classics and Moderns in Economics: Essays on Nineteenth And Twentieth Century Economic Thought: Vol. 2". Routledge. Chpt. 22, pp 203+.
* McCraw, Thomas K., 2007. "Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction". Belknap Press.
* Carayannis, E. G. and Ziemnowicz, C., 2007. "Rediscovering Schumpeter". Palgrave Mcmillan. ISBN 978-1403942418.
* Harry Dahms 1995. "From Creative Action to the Social Rationalization of the Economy: Joseph A. Schumpeter's Social Theory." "Sociological Theory" 13 (1): 1-13.
*Richard Swedberg, "Schumpeter: A Biography." Princeton: Princeton Uni Press, 1991.
* Michaelides, P. and Milios, J. (2005), Did Hilferding Influence Schumpeter?, History of Economics Review, Vol. 41, Winter, pp. 98-125.
* Michaelides, P. and Milios, J. (2004), Hilferding’s Influence on Schumpeter: A First Discussion, European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference, Crete, Greece, 28-31 October (CD-ROM).
* Michaelides, P., Milios, J. and Vouldis, A. (2007), Schumpeter and Lederer on Economic Growth, Technology and Credit, European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference, Porto, 2007, 1-3 November (CD-ROM)...

External links

* Retrieved on December 4 2007.
* Retrieved on December 4 2007.
* Retrieved on December 4 2007.
* Retrieved on December 4 2007.
* Retrieved on December 4 2007.
*