Additional Protocol to the Convention on cybercrime

Additional Protocol to the Convention on cybercrime

Additional Protocol to the Convention on cybercrime is an additional to the Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention, addressing materials and "acts of racist or xenophobic nature committed through computer networks," was proposed by some member States. This additional protocol was the subject of negotiations in late 2001 and early 2002. Final text of this protocol was adopted by the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers on 7 November 2002 [http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/COEFAQs.htm#topicE Frequently asked questions and answers Council of Europe Convention on cybercrime] by the United States Department of Justice] under the title "Additional Protocol to the Convention on cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems", ("Protocol"). [ [http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=189&CM=8&DF=17/02/2006&CL=ENG Protocol to the Convention on cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems] on the Council of Europe web site] The Protocol opened on 28 January 2003 and entry into force is 1 March 2006. By 17 February 2006 6 States had ratified the Protocol and a further 24 had signed the Protocol but had not yet followed with ratifications. [http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=189&CM=8&DF=17/02/2006&CL=ENG APCoc Treaty open for signature by the States which have signed the Treaty ETS 185.] on the Council of Europe web site]

The Protocol requires participating States to criminalize the dissemination of racist and xenophobic material through computer systems, as well as of racist and xenophobic-motivated threats and insults. [ [http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/COEFAQs.htm#topicE Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers] by the United States Department of Justice. Last update 10 November 2003] Article 6, Section 1 of the Protocol specifically covers the denial of the Holocaust and other genocides recognized as such by other international courts set up since 1945 by relevant international legal instruments. Section 2 of Article 6 allows a Party to the Protocol at their discretion only to prosecute if the offense is committed with the intent to incite hatred, discrimination or violence; or to make use of a reservation, by allowing a Party not to apply – in whole or in part – Article 6. [ [http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Reports/Html/189.htm Explanatory Report on the additional protocol to the convention on cybercrime] ]

The Council of Europe "Explanatory Report" of the Protocol states "European Court of Human Rights has made it clear that the denial or revision of “clearly established historical facts – such as the Holocaust – [...] would be removed from the protection of Article 10 by Article 17” of the ECHR (see in this context the Lehideux and Isorni judgment of 23 September 1998)". [ [http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Reports/Html/189.htm Explanatory Report on the additional protocol to the convention on cybercrime] ]

Neither of the English speaking states in Europe — Ireland and the United Kingdom — have signed the convention. On 8 July 2005 Canada became the only non European state to sign the convention. The United States government does not believe that the final version of the Protocol is consistent with the United States' constitutional guarantees and has informed the Council of Europe that the United States will not become a Party to the protocol.

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Convention on Cybercrime — The Convention on Cybercrime, also known as the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime or just the Budapest Convention, is the first international treaty seeking to address Computer crime and Internet crimes by harmonizing national laws, improving… …   Wikipedia

  • Denial of the Holodomor — Holodomor topics Historical background Famines in Russia and USSR · Soviet famine of 1932–1933 Soviet government Institutions: All Union Communist Party (Bolshevik) · Communist Party (Bolshevik) of Ukraine · …   Wikipedia

  • Historical revisionism (negationism) — For the critical re examination of historical facts, see Historical revisionism. Historical revisionism is either the legitimate scholastic re examination of existing knowledge about a historical event, or the illegitimate distortion of the… …   Wikipedia

  • Computer crime in Canada — Computer crime, or cybercrime, is an evolving international phenomenon. People and businesses in Canada and other countries may be affected by computer crimes that may, or may not originate within the borders of their country. What is computer… …   Wikipedia

  • Lehideux and Isorni v. France — (case no. 55/1997/839/1045, application no. 24662/94, Publication 1998 VII, no. 92, was a case heard by the European Court of Human Rights on whether a person had the right under the free speech granted under Article 10 of the European Convention …   Wikipedia

  • David Duke — This article is about the white nationalist. For the Scottish football player, see David Duke (footballer). David Duke …   Wikipedia

  • Armenian Genocide denial — Armenian Genocide Background Armenians in the Ottoman Empire …   Wikipedia

  • Nanking Massacre denial — Nanking Massacrev · d · e Battl …   Wikipedia

  • Ernst Zündel — Born April 24, 1939 (1939 04 24) (age 72) Bad Wildbad, Germany …   Wikipedia

  • Did Six Million Really Die? — Antisemitism Part of Jewish history …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”