Bright-line rule

Bright-line rule

A bright-line rule, or bright-line test, is a term generally used in law which describes a clearly defined rule or standard, composed of objective factors, which leaves little or no room for varying interpretation. The purpose of a bright-line rule is to produce predictable and consistent results in its application.

Bright-line rules are usually standards established by courts in legal precedent or by legislatures in statutory provisions. Bright-line rules are often contrasted with "squishy" balancing tests, where a result is dependent on weighing several factors, which could lead to inconsistent application of law or reduce objectivity.

Debate in the US

In the United States, there is much scholarly legal debate between those favoring bright-line rules and those favoring balancing tests. While some legal scholars, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, have expressed a strong preference for bright-line rules, critics often argue that bright-line rules are over-simplistic and can lead to harsh and unjust results. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer noted that there are circumstances in which the application of bright-line rules would be inappropriate, stating that "no single set of legal rules can ever capture the ever changing complexity of human life." ["Georgia v. Randolph", 547 U.S. 103, 125, 126 S. Ct. 1515, 1529, 164 L. Ed. 2d 208, 229 (2006) (Breyer, J., concurring).] Over the course of the last three decades, many bright-line rules previously established in U.S. jurisprudence have been replaced with balancing tests.Fact|date=February 2007

Examples of bright-line rules

*Statutory rape laws - In all U.S. states, sexual intercourse with a minor is a crime. [ [http://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/olrdata/jud/rpt/2003-R-0376.htm Statutory Rape Laws by State ] ] In most states, the age of the victim and the age of the accused are the only relevant factors determinative of guilt or innocence. Because it is a bright-line rule, there is no balancing test to examine factors such as mistake of the accused, the misrepresentation of age by the minor, or the minor's consent to sexual intercourse.

Notable cases containing bright-line rules

*Miranda v. Arizona
*Goldberg v. Kelly
*Storer Doctrine
*Bridgeport Music Inc. v. Dimension Films
*SEC v. Chenery Corp., ussc|332|194|1947
*National Petroleum Refiners Assn. v. FTC, 482 F.2d 672 (D.C. Cir. 1983), "cert. denied", 415 U.S. 951 (1974)
*Heckler v. Campbell, ussc|461|458|1983
*Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, ussc|488|204|1988
*Sameena, Inc. v. U.S. Air Force, 147 F.3d 1148 9th Cir. (1998)
*Evans v the UK

References

External links

* [http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002367.html Language Log] Discussion of the phrase, with examples and history


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • bright line rule — A judicial rule that helps resolve ambiguous issues by setting a basic standard that clarifies the ambiguity and establishes a simple response. The bright line rule exists to bring clarity to a law or regulation that could be read in two (or… …   Law dictionary

  • bright-line rule — noun a) A clear cut, easy to make decision b) A clearly defined rule or standard, comprised of objective factors, which leaves little or no room for varying interpretation. See Also: bright line …   Wiktionary

  • bright line — noun A clear distinction in the context of a legal or moral judgment. In these situations, there is no bright line between aggressive play and outright cheating. See Also: bright line rule …   Wiktionary

  • bright line — n: a clear distinction that resolves a question or matter in dispute bright–line adj Merriam Webster’s Dictionary of Law. Merriam Webster. 1996. bright line …   Law dictionary

  • bright-line — [[t]ˈbraɪtˌlaɪn[/t]] adj. law representing a clear, unambiguous rule or standard. There is no bright line test as to how courts should determine which rights should be recognized[/ex] • Etymology: [1940 45] …   From formal English to slang

  • Donghae Bukbu Line — Chosŏn gŭl 동해북부선 Hancha 東海北部線 McCune–Reischauer …   Wikipedia

  • Citation signal — Introductory signals are used in legal citations to present authorities and show how the authorities relate to propositions in textual statements. A legal writer uses an introductory signal to tell readers how her citation to legal authority… …   Wikipedia

  • United States v. Correll — Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants = United States v. Correll ArgueDate = November 14 ArgueYear = 1967 DecideDate = December 11 DecideYear = 1967 FullName = United States v. Correll USVol = 389 USPage = 299 Citation = Prior = Subsequent = Holding = In …   Wikipedia

  • List of cases argued by Floyd Abrams — most influential and famous cases. As an advocate of the First Amendment, Abrams career has put him in a class of prominent legal scholars who have shaped American understanding of fundamental rights found in the United States Constitution. That… …   Wikipedia

  • Balancing test — A balancing test is any judicial test in which the jurists weigh the importance of multiple factors in a legal case. Proponents of such tests argue that they allow a deeper consideration of complex issues than a bright line rule can allow. But… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”