Academic Bill of Rights

Academic Bill of Rights

The Academic Bill of Rights (ABOR) is a document created and distributed by Students for Academic Freedom, a public advocacy group spun off from the Center for the Study of Popular Culture, a think tank founded by former progressive, now conservative activist and writer David Horowitz. The document was created as a foundational part of SAF's mission, to "end the political abuse of the university and to restore integrity to the academic mission as a disinterested pursuit of knowledge."

The Bill focuses on eight broad-based principles that call for an academic environment where decisions are made irrespective of one's personal political or religious beliefs. The Bill (and its drafting organization) have come under sharp attack, however, for using broad-based egalitarian principles and a self-identified "bipartisan" framework to promote what many identify as a highly specific ideological agenda.

The Bill's Eight Principles

#All faculty shall be hired, fired, promoted and granted tenure on the basis of their competence and appropriate knowledge in the field of their expertise and, in the humanities, the social sciences, and the arts, with a view toward fostering a plurality of methodologies and perspectives. No faculty shall be hired or fired or denied promotion or tenure on the basis of his or her political or religious beliefs.
#No faculty member will be excluded from tenure, search and hiring committees on the basis of their political or religious beliefs.
#Students will be graded solely on the basis of their reasoned answers and appropriate knowledge of the subjects and disciplines they study, not on the basis of their political or religious beliefs.
#Curricula and reading lists in the humanities and social sciences should reflect the uncertainty and unsettled character of all human knowledge in these areas by providing students with dissenting sources and viewpoints where appropriate. While teachers are and should be free to pursue their own findings and perspectives in presenting their views, they should consider and make their students aware of other viewpoints. Academic disciplines should welcome a diversity of approaches to unsettled questions.
#Exposing students to the spectrum of significant scholarly viewpoints on the subjects examined in their courses is a major responsibility of faculty. Faculty will not use their courses for the purpose of political, ideological, religious or anti-religious indoctrination.
#Selection of speakers, allocation of funds for speakers programs and other student activities will observe the principles of academic freedom and promote intellectual pluralism.
#An environment conducive to the civil exchange of ideas being an essential component of a free university, the obstruction of invited campus speakers, destruction of campus literature or other effort to obstruct this exchange will not be tolerated.
#Knowledge advances when individual scholars are left free to reach their own conclusions about which methods, facts, and theories have been validated by research. Academic institutions and professional societies formed to advance knowledge within an area of research, maintain the integrity of the research process, and organize the professional lives of related researchers serve as indispensable venues within which scholars circulate research findings and debate their interpretation. To perform these functions adequately, academic institutions and professional societies should maintain a posture of organizational neutrality with respect to the substantive disagreements that divide researchers on questions within, or outside, their fields of inquiry. [ [http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/abor.html Academic Bill of Rights - Basic Texts - Documents - Students For Academic Freedom ] ]

Criticism

Pointing to the ideological agenda of the Bill's drafters and supporters, a number of organizations have come out in strong opposition to the Bill, expressing pointed critique of both its aims and its content. The critics come from both the political left and right.

One of the first organizations to come out in opposition to the bill was the American Association of University Professors (AAUP). While agreeing with the underlying principles of freedom, equality, and pluralism in the university community, the association said that the bill "infringes academic freedom in the very act of purporting to protect it." Along with the Santorum Amendment the Academic Bill of Rights is viewed by some individual academics as a threat to academic freedom. [ [http://www.bemidjistate.edu/dsiems/ID/teach.html Intelligent Design: Teach the Controversy?] Dann P. Siems, Assistant Professor Biology & Integrative Studies, Bemidji State University] Others have suggested that it may allow students to claim discrimination when tested on evolution. [ [http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/comments/bachmann_and_horowitz_and_the_academic_bill_of_rights/ Pharyngula::Bachmann and Horowitz and the "Academic Bill of Rights" ] ]

Moderate, libertarian, and conservative critics of the ABOR have asserted that it would open the door to a right wing version of the campus speech code. An article by David T. Beito, Ralph E. Luker and Robert K.C. Johnson in the "Perspectives" magazine of the American Historical Association warned that the ABOR "could snuff out all controversial discussion in the classroom. A campus governed by the ABOR would present professors with an impossible dilemma: either play it safe or risk administrative censure by saying something that might offend an overly sensitive student."

The bill has also been opposed by the American Library Association, whose members approved a resolution stating that the Bill "would impose extra-academic standards on academic institutions, directly interfering in course content, the classroom, the research process, and hiring and tenure decisions."

The Academic Bill of Rights has also received opposition from a number of other educational and public interest groups, including the American Federation of Teachers, the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC), the National Association of Scholars (NAS), and others. A number of left-leaning groups, including Refuse and Resist, the AFL-CIO, SourceWatch, and more, have also expressed concern and criticism of the Bill, particularly warning against the regulatory oversight that the bill would place upon academic institutions, if passed.

References

*David T. Beito, K.C. Johnson, and Ralph E. Luker [http://www.historians.org/Perspectives/issues/2006/0603/0603vie2.cfm "The AHA's Double Standard on Academic Freedom"] Perspectives, March 2006 (with Ralph E. Luker, and Robert K. C. Johnson).

* Dann P. Siems [http://www.bemidjistate.edu/dsiems/ID/teach.html Intelligent Design: Teaching the Controversty]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Academic freedom — is the belief that the freedom of inquiry by students and faculty members is essential to the mission of the academy. They argue that academic communities are repeatedly targeted for repression due to their ability to shape and control the flow… …   Wikipedia

  • Bill Morrow (California politician) — William Phillip Morrow (born April 19, 1954) is a U.S. Republican politician from the state of California, who used to be in the California State Senate representing the 38th district which includes northern San Diego County and the cities of San …   Wikipedia

  • Academic Freedom bills — are a series of anti evolution bills introduced in State legislatures in the United States between 2004 and 2008. They purport that teachers, students, and college professors face intimidation and retaliation when discussing scientific criticisms …   Wikipedia

  • House Bill H-837 — House Bill H 837, AKA The Academic Freedom Bill of Rights, is a proposed bill that, if passed, would allow students to establish lawsuits against their professors and the university if they grow intolerant of their beliefs. This bill has been… …   Wikipedia

  • Human rights — Rights Theoretical distinctions Natural and legal rights Claim rights and liberty rights Negative and positive rights Individual an …   Wikipedia

  • Bill Clinton — William Clinton redirects here. For other uses, see William Clinton (disambiguation). Bill Clinton …   Wikipedia

  • Bill Ayers — Infobox academic name = William C. Ayers box width = image size = 150px image width = caption = birth date = birth date and age|1944|12|26 birth place = Glen Ellyn, Illinois death date = death place = residence = Chicago, Illinois citizenship =… …   Wikipedia

  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation — Infobox Non profit Non profit name = Bill Melinda Gates Foundation Non profit founded date = 2000 founder = Bill Melinda Gates location = Seattle, Washington origins = key people = Bill Gates, co founder and co chair Melinda French Gates, co… …   Wikipedia

  • Bill Bradley — Infobox Senator | name=Bill Bradley jr/sr= United States Senator state=New Jersey party=Democratic religion=Presbyterian term start=January 3, 1979 term end=January 3, 1997 preceded=Clifford P. Case succeeded=Robert Torricelli date of birth=birth …   Wikipedia

  • African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968) — American Civil Rights Movement redirects here. For the earlier period, see African American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954). Prominent figures of the African American Civil Rights Movement. Clockwise from top left: W. E. B. Du Bois, Malcolm X,… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”